FMEP Legislative Round-Up: March 8, 2024

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New episodes of FMEP’s Occupied Thoughts podcast:

 

1. Bills & Resolutions

NO CEASEFIRE! NO PALESTINIAN STATE! NO AID FOR PALESTINIANS!

Targeting Free Speech/Protest

  • S. 3894 (text): Introduced 3/7/24 by Cotton (R-AR), “A bill to prohibit the granting or renewing of security clearances to a person who has expressed support for a foreign terrorist organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or any affiliate of such Corps, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and for other purposes,” aka, the “‘No Clearances for Terrorist Sympathizers Act of 2024.”  Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Also see Cotton press release – excerpt: “Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) today introduced two bills in response to the U.S. airman who self-immolated outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. on February 25. ‘The mission of our service members is to defend America, and anyone who supports Hamas or any other terrorist group should not receive a security clearance. Likewise, no active-duty members of the military should be allowed to participate in demonstrations that aim to undermine the security of America and our allies,’ said Senator Cotton.
  • S. 3890 (text): Introduced 3/7/24 by Cotton (R-AR), A bill to prohibit certain off-post demonstrations,” aka, the “Prohibiting Certain Off Post Protests Act.” Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Also see Cotton press release – excerpt: “Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) today introduced two bills in response to the U.S. airman who self-immolated outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. on February 25. ‘The mission of our service members is to defend America, and anyone who supports Hamas or any other terrorist group should not receive a security clearance. Likewise, no active-duty members of the military should be allowed to participate in demonstrations that aim to undermine the security of America and our allies,’ said Senator Cotton.
  • S. 3887 (text): Introduced 3/6/24 by Cotton (R-IN), the “Stop Pro-Terrorist Riots Now Act.” Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.  Per Cotton’s press release, this legislation “would increase the punishments for rioting and provide mandatory sentences for anyone committing violence as part of a riot. Senator Cotton introduced the bill in response to the increasing number of anti-Semitic “protests”—often violent—by pro-Hamas leftists since Hamas’s October 7 terrorist attack on Israel.” As noted in ICNL’s invaluable US Protest Law Tracker, this bill: “Would significantly increase the penalties for federal ‘riot’ and ‘incitement to riot’ offenses if they involve property damage or injury. The bill would create a new, mandatory one-year prison sentence for anyone who commits ‘an act of violence’ or aids someone else in doing so, while participating in, organizing, ‘inciting,’ ‘promoting,’ or ‘encouraging’ a ‘riot.’ The maximum penalty would jump to 10, instead of 5, years in prison. Federal law defines ‘act of violence’ broadly to include using force against property—or just attempting or threatening to use such force. Under the bill, someone who knocked over a trash can, or merely threatened to do so, while cheering on an unruly protest, could face 10 years in prison.”

Defending Free Speech/Protest (kind of, maybe)

  • S. 3883: Introduced 3/6/24 by Casey (D-PA) and 6 bipartisan cosponsors, “A bill to appropriate funds for the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education.” Referred to the Committee on Appropriations. Casey’s press release states: “Amidst a notable increase in reported incidents of antisemitism, anti-Muslim, and anti-Arab actions in schools across the Nation, the bill would give OCR the capacity to meet the moment and ensure students are free from harassment and discrimination.” This is laudable framing. The proof of intent, of course, would be in the implementation – and given some of the cosponsors of this, there is strong reason to suspect that its real purpose is to beef of policing of critics/criticism of Israel on campuses.
  • HR 7540 (text): Introduced 3/5/24 by Greene (R-GA), “To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide protections for nonviolent political protesters, and for other purposes,” aka, the “Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2024.” Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select). NOTE: Greene’s motivation for this bill is the case of Matthew Perna, a convicted January 6th rioter (he pleaded guilty to a list of charges) who committed suicide while awaiting sentencing. For the “January 6th-was-a-righteous-event-and-the-people-involved-were-innocent-patriots-and-law-enforcement-efforts-targeting-them-ar-unjust-and-evil” crowd, Perna has become a symbol and a hero. Her questionable motivations notwithstanding, HR 7540 would legislate significant legal protections for Americans engaged in acts of political protest. Also see Greene’s press release – Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene Introduces the Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2024. NOTE: an earlier version of this bill (HR 9583) was introduced in 2022 by Gohmert (R-AZ) and Green (R-GA) [and went nowhere].

The Bible Says ALL the land belongs to Israel – so the US should too!

  • HR 7552 (text): Introduced 3/5/24 by Tenney (R-NY) and 2 cosponsors, the “RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act,” aka, “To prohibit the use of materials that use the term ‘West Bank’, and for other purposes. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. NOTE: As covered in last week’s Round-Up, Tenney (prematurely) issued a press release 2/29/24 announcing the introduction of this bill. Per her press release, Tenney stated: “The Israeli people have an undeniable and indisputable historical and legal claim over Judea and Samaria, and at this critical moment in history, the United States must reaffirm this…The misguided decision by the Biden administration to revoke the Pompeo Doctrine undermines our greatest ally in the Middle East. The RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act requires all U.S. legal documents to use the rightful term ‘Judea and Samaria’ to refer to this territory instead of the ‘West Bank.’ This bill reaffirms Israel’s rightful claim to its territory. I remain committed to defending the integrity of the Jewish state and fully supporting Israel’s sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.” [Stay tuned for legislation requiring the US documents to refer to other areas of the Middle East by their biblical names…] Also worth noting: HR 7552, in substance, is yet another “Israel-from-the-river-to-the-sea” bill.  As a reminder, on 11/7/24, the House passed H. Res. 845, censuring Rep. Tlaib (D-MI) for daring to utter that phrase (but accompanying the word “Palestine” rather than “Israel.” But don’t hold your breath for a resolution of censure on this one…

Targeting UNRWA (and entire UN system/intl orgs)

  • S. 3874: Introduced 3/5/24 by Rubio (R-FL and Rosen (D-NV), “A bill to impose sanctions with respect to foreign support for terrorist organizations in Gaza and the West Bank, and for other purposes,” aka the “Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad International Terrorism Support Prevention Act.” NOTE: this bill was introduced in 2021 as the “the Palestinian International Terrorism Support Prevention Act” – S. 1904/HR 261(attracting 24 and 57 cosponsors, respectively, and going nowhere); and in its current form in 2023 as S. 1647/HR 340 (the Senate version attracting 11 cosponsors and going nowhere; the House version passing 11/1/23). Referred (for the 3rd time) to the Committee on Foreign Relations. Also see — Rubio press release 3/5/24; also see prior Rubio press releases – 2023, 2021. Also see: Rubio, Rosen push House-passed Hamas sanctions bill in the Senate (Jewish Insider 3/5/24)

Targeting Saudi Arabia


2. Letters

Concern for Palestinians in Gaza/Ceasefire/Etc.

Support for Israel’s War on Gaza

Targeting UNRWA/Intl Orgs

Targeting Iran

 

3. Hearings & Markups

March 7, 2024: The House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing entitled, “Legislation to Protect American Data and National Security from Foreign Adversaries” (video). Chair Rodgers (R-WA)’s opening statement is here. The focus of the hearing was approving two pieces of legislation targeting Chinese control over popular apps like TikTok — HR 7521, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act and HR 7520the Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024. Notably, on 3/6/24 the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) sent a letter to House Energy and Commerce Committee (h/t to Jewish Insider for flagging) urging the Committee to approve HR 7521, arguing that “Our community understands that social media is a major driver of the rise in antisemitism, and that TikTok is the worst offender by far…” The letter closes: “There is no one answer to the rise in antisemitism, but Congress must act when it can – and HR 7521 is a very important step that Congress can take today. A vote for HR 7521 is a vote against antisemitism.” The committee approved HR 7521 unanimously.

March 7, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere held a hearing entitled, “The Agents of Antisemitism in Latin America” (video).  The sole witness was State Department Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Deborah Lipstadt (statement).

March 3, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s held a hearing to consider 5 Biden Administration nominations, including the nomination of Erik John Woodhouse to be Head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination. Check out the hearing (video) for members’ questions to Woodhouse regarding sanctions on Iran and others. Also note that in his opening statement, SFRC Chair Cardin (D-MD) stated: “Senator Risch and I are working on an agenda for a business meeting that we hope we will be able to notice very shortly. We’re working with several bipartisan bills that have been suggested by members of the Senate, including Senator Rubio and Hassan’s bipartisan bill – the SHIP Act, which follows up on the hearing we had in regards to Iran, and enforcing the sanctions against Iran through secondary sanctions. We hope that we’ll be able to bring that bill before our committee.”

March 6, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a hearing entitled, Global Food Security. Witnesses were USAID Assistant to the Administrator for Resilience, Environment, and Food Security Dina Esposito (testimony) and Department of State Special Envoy for Global Food Security Cary Fowler (testimony). Also see: hearing video. Notably, this hearing about “food security” for the most part totally ignored the MAN-MADE FAMINE in the Gaza Strip, imposed by Israel and supported/enabled by the U.S., that is literally killing people today and if not urgently stopped will lead to mass deaths. The exceptions: Sen. Van Hollen (D-MD), who raised concerns about the situation in the Gaza Strip starting at 59:28 in the hearing (see his exchange with the witnesses, below) and Kaine (D-VA), who asked about air drops at 1:12:17, in an exchange that highlighted the degree to which this is an extreme option of last resort.

Excerpt:

Van Hollen: “I do want to focus on the situation in Gaza because according to all reports four out of five of the hungriest people in the world today live in Gaza, and this is clearly a man-made crisis. There was no real food insecurity in Gaza until the last four months. We also have recently passed the grim threshold where people are not just on the verge of starvation but over 15 kids have now died of starvation in Gaza. The UN’s humanitarian coordinator put out an update on February 21st of this year finding that decline in the population’s nutrition status is…happening at a globally unprecedented rate and that children in Gaza are being starved at the fastest rate that the world has ever seen, according to the humanitarian coordinator. I am very pleased to see both the president the vice president and the USAID administrator more recently make a forceful comments about the need for the Netanyahu government to allow more aid into Gaza. Twenty-five senators wrote to the president in early February laying out five specific specific steps that could be taken to do that — none of those steps have been implemented as of now. So Miss Esposito, if you could just make one thing really clear: the issue is not the lack of the US or the World Food Program making food available to go into Gaza – is that right? It’s not a question of not enough being made available that’s ready to go in, it’s a question of it getting in and getting to people in need. 

Esposito: “Thank you Senator. I want to start by saying upfront that my remit is on the development side and all of the programs we had in Gaza have been suspended of course because of the conflict. But I do know that we do have great concern about the imminence of a famine and that our team is really work working on getting um more food in, especially for women and children and that there is opportunity and available food to move in…

Van Hollen: “Dr Fowler you’re an expert on food security and nutrition and I’d like for you just to talk a little bit about the long-term impacts of of malnutrition and going without food for kids. UNICEF’s  Ted Chapon, who’s the deputy executive director for humanitarian action at UNICEF pointed out, and I quote, that…the international community has quote “been warning for weeks that the Gaza Strip is on the brink of a nutrition crisis. If the conflict doesn’t end now children’s nutrition will continue to plummet leading to preventable deaths or health issues which will affect the children of Gaza for the rest of their lives and have potential intergenerational consequences.” Do you agree that that can be a a consequence of kids being deprived of nutrition?
Fowler: “Yes, I do. As you know the UN has estimated that 90% of the population in Gaza continues to face acute food in security and this has an impact first and foremost on children and of course women as well. We know that early interventions for childhood nutrition pay benefits for the entire life of the of the person. On the flip side of that we know that long periods without sufficient food, without the necessary calories, micronutrients, macronutrients – this also can have lifelong consequences. I spoke earlier to this committee about the problem of stunting. So we believe that Israel must facilitate the delivery of assistance through crossings, improve the deconfliction procedures to ensure that that aid can move safely and securely, and that restrictions  that prevent the flow of lifesaving food into Gaza are not acceptable.”

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics/SOTU

Politics/elex

Biden Admin Israel/Gaza Policies

Israel’s War on Gaza

Israel Aid

  • Notus 3/7/24: Why a Fight Over Process Could Derail Ukraine Aid [“Most members say they want to do
  • something that would get aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan as quickly as possible. But they might get in their own way, as three separate proposals are currently being floated in the House, and lawmakers are jockeying over the best path forward.“]

Targeting Academia

Other

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New episodes of FMEP’s Occupied Thoughts podcast:

 

1. Bills & Resolutions

Support for ever-greater Palestinian suffering by barring all US aid

Attacking ICJ for daring to criticize Israel

  • H. Res. 1041: Introduced 2/29/24 by Jackson (R-TX) and 19 cosponsors (all Republicans), “Condemning the order issued by the International Court of Justice on January 26, 2024, imposing provisional measures against Israel. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Using claims of antisemitism (via IHRA definition) to destroy free speech & academia

  • HR 7478Introduced 2/29/24 by Yakym (R-IN) and no cosponsors, “To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of higher education, as a condition of participation in programs under title IV of such Act, to include a prohibition of antisemitic conduct in all documents relating to student or employee conduct,” aka, the “Promote Restoring Order To End Campus Targeting of Jewish Students and Faculty Act,” or “the PROTECT Jewish Students and Faculty Act”.   Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Also see: Yakym Introduces Bill Requiring Colleges to Adopt Definition of Antisemitism to Receive Federal Funds (Townhall 2/29/24) – excerpt: “Under the bill, the Higher Education Act of 1965 would be amended so that U.S. colleges and universities would be required to adopt the official working definition of antisemitism from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) as a condition of receiving Title IV federal funds for financial aid…Yakym told Townhall in a statement. ‘If these institutes of higher education want to continue receiving federal funds, they need to have clearly defined ways to root out antisemitism when it occurs. I’m proud to introduce this legislation to help ensure that Jewish students and faculty are safe on campus and that our colleges and universities are fighting – not fueling – antisemitism.'”

We really really want to give billions of military aid & equipment to Israel to use against Palestinians in Gaza!

  • HR 7493: Introduced 2/29/24 by Gottheimer (D-NJ) and 3 cosponsors (all Democrats, “Making emergency supplemental appropriations to the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to provide assistance to Israel, Ukraine, and the Indo-Pacific region, and for other purposes. Referred to the Committees on Appropriations and on the Budget. NOTE: like the many other emergency supplemental appropriations bills introduced in recent months, this bill includes BILLIONS in aid for Israel. The Round-Up will run down details of this bill only if at some point this bill looks remotely viable (which is highly unlikely).

The Bible Says ALL the land belongs to Israel – so the US should too!

  • HR XXXX (text): On 2/29/24 Tenney (R-NY) issued a press release announcing she had introduced the “RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act,” cosponsored by Randy Weber (R-TX) and D’Esposito (R-NY). NOTE: As of 3/1/24, this bill does not show up in the Congressional Record. Per the press release, Tenney stated: “The Israeli people have an undeniable and indisputable historical and legal claim over Judea and Samaria, and at this critical moment in history, the United States must reaffirm this…The misguided decision by the Biden administration to revoke the Pompeo Doctrine undermines our greatest ally in the Middle East. The RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act requires all U.S. legal documents to use the rightful term ‘Judea and Samaria’ to refer to this territory instead of the ‘West Bank.’ This bill reaffirms Israel’s rightful claim to its territory. I remain committed to defending the integrity of the Jewish state and fully supporting Israel’s sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.” [Stay tuned for legislation requiring the US documents to refer to other areas of the Middle East by their biblical names…]

 

2. Letters

UNRWA

Dear Biden: Do NOT Hold Israel or Israeli Settlers Accountable!!!!

  • 2/29/24: Sens. Rick Scott, Tom Cotton & Colleagues to Biden: Rescind Directives Intended to Undermine Israelis [letter text]. Excerpt: “We write regarding your February 1, 2024 Executive Order 14115 and February 8, 2024 National Security Memorandum 20 undermining Israeli operations against Hamas in Gaza. Both documents undercut our most valuable alliance in the Middle East. We call on you to rescind both documents and to sanction terrorists and their supporters instead of their victims. Your February 1 EO grants the State Department broad authority to arbitrarily punish Israelis in Judea and Samaria, with no defined standards for determining when sanctions are warranted. Under the guise of “peace, security, or stability of the West Bank,” it appears the State Department can punish arbitrarily any Israeli it wants. Yet, the State Department hasn’t acted against the Palestinian Authority, which makes ‘pay to slay’ payments to terrorists for murdering innocent Israeli families. Nor has the State Department taken significant action to counter the surge in Palestinian terrorism in the West Bank, which increased by 350 percent in 2023, including 300 shooting attacks. Your February 8 memorandum similarly—and falsely—implies that Israel is committing mass war crimes in its campaign against Hamas and threatens to cut off aid unless Israel meets arbitrary deadlines for providing “assurances” regarding international humanitarian law. Yet, we already have rules requiring aid recipients to comply with applicable law and in line with American interests. Moreover, Israel has provided ample evidence of the steps it takes to avoid civilian casualties, which Coordinator for Strategic Communications at the National Security Council, John Kirby, acknowledged publicly. ” Also see: press release – Cotton, Colleagues to Biden: Rescind Directives Punishing, Undermining Israelis

Concerns for Palestinians Lives

  • CIRCULATING AS OF 2/29/24: Letter to Biden Administration Regarding Reportedly Imminent Invasion of Rafah [Dear Colleague; Letter text], originated by Castro (D-TX), Raskin (D-MD), and Schakowsky (D-IL), and endorsed by Americans for Peace Now, J Street, Foreign Policy 4 America, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL). This letter is set to close for signatures on March 4, 2024.

Supporting “temporary” ceasefire

Targeting Palestinians & Anyone Associated with Them (including a dead US serviceman)

  • 2/28/24: Cotton to Austin: Why Was Airman Who Self-Immolated Allowed to Serve? [letter text] [“Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) today sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, asking him to provide information of the active-duty U.S. airman who self-immolated outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. on February 25. Senator Cotton asked Secretary Austin to respond to the “serious questions” by March 7 as to why the airman was allowed to serve when he obviously harbored extreme, anti-American views.“]
  • 2/23/24: Ogles (R-TN) letter #1 (with 4 GOP cosigners) to House Appropriations Committee leaders – Deport Palestinians Now!  [letter text].  Ogles: “The administration’s efforts to allow an untold number of Palestinians to stay in this country, when they would otherwise be inadmissible or deportable, is just the latest in Joe Biden’s treasonous efforts to expand the illegal invasion crisis. The vast majority of Palestinians support Hamas’ atrocities committed on October 7; the presence of Hamas sympathizers poses a significant threat to our national security, and it’s past time to send them back.

Other stuff

  • 2/27/24: Rubio Pushes Foreign Allies to Continue Israel Support“A Dutch appeals court has issued a decision that threatens to stop the supply of American-made F-35 jet parts to Israel. The court’s ruling, in favor of anti-Israel foreign activists, demonstrates how such groups threaten the ability of the United States, and other countries, to provide needed military assistance. As a result, this decision could prevent Israel, one of the United States’ closest allies, from defending itself against terrorist groups. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin with regard to the military supply chain problems this court decision has revealed that could prevent America from defending itself and its allies.” [letter text]. Also see: Rubio: ‘Unsettling’ that foreign courts can block US arms shipment to allies amid war (Jewish News Syndicate 2/28/24)

 

3. Hearings & Markups

March 7, 2023: The House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere will hold a hearing entitled, “The Agents of Antisemitism in Latin America.”  The sole scheduled witness is State Department Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Deborah Lipstadt.

February 29, 2024: The House Armed Services held a hearing entitled, “A Review of Defense Secretary Austin’s Unannounced Absence.” The sole witness was Secretary of Defense Austin (statement). Also see: hearing video. This hearing included a significant discussion of the Biden Administration’s policy regarding Israel’s war on Gaza. Austin’s exchange with Khanna (D-CA), which included Austin talking about how many Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023, was quickly transformed into a media/hasbara controversy, with predictable, well-rehearsed accusations that Austin was citing “Hamas” numbers. As a reminder, the numbers of dead provided by the Palestinian Ministry of Health have proven in previous wars to be accurate (and, indeed, are relied on and cited by Israeli officials). Moreover, the current numbers being cited by that Ministry are widely understood as highly conservative, as they do not count the thousands of Palestinians whose bodies remain buried under rubble or whose deaths were not reported to the ministry and whose bodies were simply buried by survivors. But hey, why should facts get in the way of a super fun opportunity for defenders of Israel to yet again delegitimize/attack Palestinians even as they are being killed en masses? And the fact that Austin’s comment also provided a super fun opportunity for Israel and Republicans to suggest that the Biden Administration – which for 5 months has done everything possible to defend and support Israel’s genocide in Gaza – is pro-Hamas just makes this irresistible, amirite? See: Democrat grills Austin on lack of consequences for Israel over Gaza death toll (The Hill); Pentagon head says over 25,000 women, kids killed in Gaza, inflating Hamas claim (Times of Israel); Pentagon ‘clarifies’ Austin cited Hamas statistics in testimony to Congress (Israel Hayom); Pentagon walks back Austin’s Gaza casualty figures (Reuters)

February 29, 2024: The House Committee on Education & the Workforce held a “Bipartisan Member Roundtable” entitled, “Antisemitism at Postsecondary Institutions.” Participants were all students: Shabbos Kestenbaum, Harvard University (statement – this student is part of a lawsuit against Harvard that uses the IHRA definition as its hook); Noah Rubin, University of Pennsylvania (statement); Talia Khan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (statement); Eden Yadegar, Columbia University (statement); Hannah Beth Schlacter, University of California, Berkeley (statement); Joe J. Gindi, Rutgers University (statement); Kevin Feigelis, Stanford University (statement); Yasmeen Ohebsion, Tulane University (statement); and Jacob Khalili, Cooper Union (statement). Also see:

  • video of the roundtable (note the applause from the room after some student statements).
  • Highlights of the Q&A include: Rep. Manning (D-NC) comparing the current moment to 1932 Germany all over again, and pogroms in 1903 Russia; Rep. Owens (R-UT) comparing Jewish students today to Black students during the civil rights era (in effect casting Palestine rights protesters state/police-backed white supremacists and racists); Rep. Torres (D-NY) quoting MLK  — “History will record that the greatest tragedy is not the strident clamor of the bad people, but it’s the appalling silence of the good people” — during an event that is taking place while Israelis committing an actual genocide in Gaza, and on the same day that more than 100 starving Palestinians were killed trying to get food in northern Gaza – shot by Israel, run over by Israeli vehicles, or trampled in the crush of people trying to flee Israeli guns and vehicles (Israel’s actions over the past 5 months – the defense of which are central to what the students and Congress are calling antisemitism – were not mentioned a single time during this nearly 90 minute event); and Rep. Allen (R-GA) citing the Bible, Genesis 12:3 (suggesting that God will bless those who are good to the Jews and curse those who are not).
  • Note that the event included multiple references to Congress holding universities accountable; promises of new legislation; and a call for an on-site 3rd party or federal monitor/watchdog on campuses to enforce Congress’s views on what is antisemitism (raised by Torres).
  • Foxx (R-NC) opening statement [“…This Committee will continue to hold universities accountable. Today, we will hear from nine students about the antisemitism they and their fellow students are experiencing and how their administrations are responding…Even after December’s hearing, university leaders are still not correcting course. Let me be clear: This is not about policing speech or opinions, even if disagreeable or offensive. It is about protecting Jewish students from the harassment, threats, intimidation, and assaults plaguing their campuses—as universities are obligated to under Title VI but have repeatedly failed to do. That failure is unacceptable.”
  • Notably, the through-line for the entire roundtable, including the central point in the statements of every student participant, was the conflation of Jewish identity with support for/identification with Israel (conflation that, when committed by critics of Israel, is rightly recognized as ANTISEMITIC), and by extension the conflation of criticism/activism targeting Israel, and assertions of Palestinian rights/identity/grievances/national aspiration as ipso facto antisemitism.
  • Media: Jewish students recount a series of campus horror stories at congressional roundtable (Jewish Insider 3/1/24); Jewish Students Describe Facing Antisemitism on Campus to Members of Congress (New York Times 3/1/24)

February 28, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will held a hearing entitled, “Tehran’s Shadow Army: Addressing Iran’s Proxy Network in the Middle East.” Witnesses were: The Brookings Institution Vice President and Director, Foreign Policy Suzanne Maloney (statement) and Cerberus Global Investments Vice Chairman Brian Hook (statement). Also see: Risch (R-ID) opening statement; hearing video.

February 27, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism held a hearing entitled, Yemen and Red Sea Security Issues.” Witnesses were State Department Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking (statement) and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Dan Shapiro (statement). NOTE: This whole 2-hour hearing is very much worth watching in full. It includes serious questions from some members of Congress regarding the Biden Admininstration’s policy of bombing Yemen and, relatedly, its policies vis-a-vis Israel’s war on Gaza. Also see:

  • hearing video;
  • Dan Shapiro: Houthi attacks ‘almost entirely unrelated to Israel’ (Jewish News Syndicate 2/29/24).
  • The hearing included a testy exchange between Van Hollen (D-MD) and Hagerty (R-TN) (starting at 01:25:17). Van Hollen, responding to allegations by Hagerty that humanitarian aid from the UN and others is being diverted by Hamas,  noting that David Satterfield, the US Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues, has made absolutely clear that with respect to aid from UN organizations and international NGOS, he has had no reports of diversion of such aid to Hamas, including from Israelis. Hagerty responds (interrupts, with his tone dripping with contempt), that he has had “direct reports from Israelis” that this is exactly what is happening, and suggests that Satterfield hasn’t bothered talking to the Israeli national security advisor.
  • It also included a notable (and somewhat surreal) exchange between Sen. Van Hollen and Ambassador Shapiro (starting around 01:25:25). Van Hollen pointed out that Houthi attacks are connected to Israel’s war on Gaza. Shapiro largely dismissed this argument, leading Van Hollen to point out that Houthi attacks on shipping “went down significantly during the period of the humanitarian pause in November.” Shapiro agreed there was a “decline” during that period (but not a “complete cessation“), noting that there have been various “spikes and valleys” in these attacks, but said he does not know to what we can attribute that. He went on to muse that drops in Houthi attacks may well be the result of U.S. airstrikes on Yemen, “while they re-load and prepare for their next strikes.” Van Hollen responded, accurately, that at the time of the November ceasefire, the US had not yet begun bombing Yemen [meaning that it is disingenuous in the extreme to suggest that a drop in Houthi attacks during that period is somehow the result of the U.S. policy of bombing Yemen]..

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Israel’s War on Gaza

US politics/elex

More $$ for Israel

Biden Policies

 

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New from FMEP:

 

1. Bills & Resolutions

none [Congress in recess]

 

2. Letters

 

3. Hearings & Markups

February 28, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hold a hearing entitled, “Tehran’s Shadow Army: Addressing Iran’s Proxy Network in the Middle East.” Witnesses (so far) will be: The Brookings Institution Vice President and Director, Foreign Policy Suzanne Maloney and Cerberus Global Investments Vice Chairman Brian Hook.

February 27, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism will hold a hearing entitled, Yemen and Red Sea Security Issues.” Witnesses (so far) will be State Department Special Envoy for Yemen Tim Lenderking and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Dan Shapiro.

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics/Elex

Pro-Israel Lobbying in Congress

  • Jewish Community Voice (South New Jersey) 2/21/24: Local activists travel to DC to advocate for Israel aid, security grants, and against antisemitism [“The activists who attended the Fly-In urged their members of congress and senators to advance the Antisemitism Awareness Act, pass military support for Israel, and increase funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP). Rosenthal and Waldman personally met with Congressman Tom Kean of NJ’s 7th District, Congressman Donald Norcross of NJ’s 1st District, NJ Senator Robert Menendez, Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman of NJ’s 12th District, and staff from Senator Cory Booker’s office.“]

US Aid to Israel

Israel War on Gaza on the Hill

Israel-Hezbollah

Other stuff

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Massive Supplemental Aid for Israel Takes Center Stage
4. Hearings & Markups
5. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New from FMEP:

  • New episode of FMEP’s Occupied Thoughts podcast 2/15/24: Promoting Risk & Undermining Rights: Morningstar’s Betrayal of Palestine & ESG (Part 2), ft. FMEP’s Lara Friedman in conversation with international legal expert in business and human rights Tara Van Ho about the latest twist in the ongoing controversy involving the Chicago-based financial services company Morningstar Inc. and its subsidiary Sustainalytics, over how it deals with Israel and the Occupied Palestinian territories.
  • NIAC webinar 2/15/24, The War in Gaza and the Prospect of Regional War, ft. Lara Friedman (FMEP) Daniel Levy (US/MEP), Barbara Slavin (Stimson Center), Jim Zogby (AAI), and Jamal Abdi (NIAC)
  • New episode of FMEP’s Occupied Thoughts podcast 2/13/24- “Humanitarian Catastrophe in Gaza, Palestinian Refugees, and the Campaign Against UNRWA,” ft. FMEP non-resident fellow Peter Beinart in conversation with Chris Gunness, former Spokesman and Director of Strategic Communications at UNRWA. They discuss the enormous humanitarian crisis in Rafah and Gaza more broadly as well as the history and function of UNRWA – the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East – and the campaign against it.
  • New episode of FMEP’s Occupied Thoughts podcast 2/12/24 – Israel’s War on Gaza: Implications & Impacts on Saudi Policies & Politics, ft. FMEP’s Lara Friedman in conversation with Saudi researcher and analyst of Saudi foreign policy Aziz Alghashian about the impact of Israel’s now more than 4-month-long war on Gaza on the political calculations and policies of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

 

1. Bills & Resolutions

(MASSIVE EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL AID FOR ISRAEL, ETC) HR 815: On 2/13/24 the Senate passed the massive Israel (and Ukraine) emergency supplemental aid bill by a vote of 70-29. The bill was then sent to the House, where its fate (as of this writing) remains in question. See section 3, below, for full details.

(MASSIVE EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL AID FOR ISRAEL, ETC) HR 7372: Introduced 2/15/24 by Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and 5 bipartisan cosponsors — Golden (D-ME), Bacon (R-NE), Case (D-HI), Lawler (R-NY) and Perez (D-WA) — the “Defending Borders, Defending Democracies Act,” aka, “Making emergency supplemental appropriations to provide defense support to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to suspend the entry of inadmissible aliens, and for other purposes.”  Also see: press release summarizing what the bill’s sponsors see as the highlights of the bill. Referred to the Committees on Appropriations and the Budget. NOTE: This bill is in effect a rejection of the Senate-passed emergency supplemental (HR 815) currently awaiting House action (or non-action). A key difference – HR 7372 re-inserts border policy language. Also, like the other versions it includes massive funding for Israel with zero conditions/restrictions/accoutability. It includes no funding that could be made available for Palestinians in Gaza (in contrast to the Senate bill, which contains not a single dollar hard earmarked for Palestinains in Gaza, but includes substantial funding that may be used for humanitarian needs, including in Gaza). Indeed, the words “Gaza” and “Palestinians” do not appear anywhere in the bill. Also see: House lawmakers to offer their own Ukraine and border bill – Several members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus argued any legislation should prioritize border security and contain offsets for foreign aid. (Politico 2/14/24); Bipartisan group of House moderates to propose slimmed down foreign aid package (Jewish Insider 2/16/24)

(THE RETURN OF THE ISRAEL ANTI-BOYCOTT ACT) HR 3016: Introduced by Lawler (R-NY) and Gottheimer (D-NJ), 4/28/23, “To amend the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018 to apply the provisions of that Act to international governmental organizations,” aka, the “IGO Anti-Boycott Act.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Passed by the House 2/13/24 by voice vote. Key things to know about HR 3106:

  • While the bill doesn’t mention Israel, HR 3016 is the latest iteration of legislation known previously as the “Israel Anti-Boycott Act”, which was promoted repeatedly in the past, in various forms, by AIPAC. For background see: S. 720/HR 1697 (2017); HR 5595 (2020), HR 6940 (2022).
  • Making this crystal clear, the lead sponsor of the bill told Jewish Insider: “I’m proud to introduce this bipartisan piece of legislation aimed at preventing international governmental organizations from discriminating against our allies…This has been spurred on by bad actors that have sought to embargo Israel using BDS, which is an absurd and antisemitic policy.” Also: “AIPAC spokesperson Marshall Wittmann told JI that the group supports the bill “to combat international attempts to isolate and delegitimize America’s ally, Israel.”
  • HR 3016 seeks to amend/expand current US anti-boycott law. That law is based on the idea of preventing US citizens from being **compelled or coerced** into boycotting Israel as a condition for doing business abroad under the Arab League Boycott of Israel (which included coercive secondary sanctions). HR 3016, like previous versions of the IABA, seeks to extend this law to also cover US citizens who boycott Israel &/or settlements NOT because they are being compelled/coerced, but because it reflects their own values/political views, including support for intl law — with the hook being the EU’s policy urging companies to differentiate between Israel and settlements, and the UN’s database of companies working in settlements. As a reminder, the EU policy nor the UN database are entirely informational/advisory; neither one includes any enforcement or accountability mechanism of any kind.  Under HR 3016, anyone who violates or “abets” what would thus be a ban on VOLUNTARY, VALUES-BASED decisions to boycott Israel or settlements, grounded in Americans’ personal and political views &/or informed by respect for international law— could face massive CRIMINAL/CIVIL PENALTIES. What do I mean by “massive CRIMINAL/CIVIL PENALTIES”? I mean up to $1 MILLION in fines or up to 20 YEARS IN PRISON. Think I’m exaggerating? Read the legislation that it would amend.
  • NOTE: On 2/12/24, the ACLU sent a letter to House members urging them to vote against HR 3016, noting, among other things, “it unconstitutionally targets political boycotts for criminal penalties. Although the ACLU does not take a position on particular boycotts of foreign countries, we stand firmly against any infringement of fundamental First Amendment rights, including the right to boycott. If the bill were to pass and take effect, we would consider challenging it in court.
  • For further background/analysis on this legislation see this collection of resources.
  • Also see: US anti-boycott act raises freedom of expression concerns (The New Arab 2/15/24);

(BIDEN: IT’S TOTALLY COOL IF YOU WANT TO DECLARE WAR ON GAZA!) S. Con. Res. 28: Introduced 2/13/24 by Scott (R-SC) and Wicker (R-MS), “A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress regarding the authority of the President to use appropriate and necessary force to liberate United States citizens being held by Hamas. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. Also see: Senators Scott, Wicker, Cotton: President Biden has Authority to Use Military Force to Secure Release of American Hostages in Gaza

(TARGETING UNRWA) HR 7392: Introduced 2/15/24 by Steube (R-FL) and 5 cosponsors (all Republicans), “To reprogram Federal funds appropriated for UNRWA to construct the southwest border wall and to prohibit future funding for UNRWA. Referred to the Committees on Appropriations and on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Rep. Steube announces legislation to stop funding UNRWA after reports on agency’s ties to Hamas

(TARGETING UNRWA) HR 7206: Introduced 2/1/24 (not previously reported in the Round-Up – yeah, sorry, I missed this one) by Ogles (R-AZ) and 2 cosponsors (both Republicans), the “UNRWA FTO Designation Act” aka “To designate the United Nations Relief and Works Agency as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and for other purposes.” Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.  NOTE: Under US law, Congress does not have the authority to designate FTOs.

(HUMANITARIAN AID FOR GAZA) S. Res. XXX (pdf): On 2/9/24, Sen. Welch (D-VT) issued a press release announcing the introduction of a resolution “Calling for the urgent delivery of sufficient humanitarian aid to address the needs of civilians in Gaza.” Per that press release, the resolution “calls on the Administration, on an urgent basis, and working with allies and partners within the international community, to help facilitate the humanitarian aid needed to prevent starvation and disease in Gaza by: Streamlining the inspection of trucks entering Gaza; Increasing the access points for aid deliveries into Gaza; Ensuring the distribution of adequate fuel to hospitals and humanitarian organizations in Gaza; Ensuring the ability of humanitarian organizations to deliver aid safely and urgently in Gaza; Expanding the number of safe shelters and food distribution locations for displaced people in Gaza; Supporting efforts to restore water supply lines; and Working to secure the additional funding necessary to support the humanitarian response. ” The press release also notes that, “The resolution is supported by CARE, Catholic Relief Services, J Street, Church World Service, Mennonite Central Committee, Project HOPE, Mercy Corps, and ANERA.” NOTE: As of this writing the resolution does not appear in the Congressional Record (does not appear to have actually been introduced).

(NO NORMALIZING ASSAD REGIME!) HR 3202: Introduced 5/11/23 by Wilson (R-SC), “To prohibit any official action to recognize or normalize relations with any Government of Syria that is led by Bashar al-Assad.” Passed by the House 2/14/24 under suspension of the rules by a vote of 389-32 (“no” votes came from 4 Republicans and 28 Democrats. Also see: Tough Anti-Assad Bill Advances on Bipartisan Vote in House (Foundation for Defense of Democracies 2/16/24)

(CONDEMNING RAPE/SEXUAL VIOLENCE BY HAMAS) H. Res. 966: Introduced 1/16/24 by Frankel (D-FL) and having 200 cosponsors (bipartisan), “Condemning rape and sexual violence committed by Hamas in its war against Israel.” Passed by the House 2/14/24 under suspension of the rule by a vote of 418 – 0, with 1 voting “present”. The one “present” vote was Rep. Tlaib (D-MI), who delivered a powerful floor statement articulating her concerns: “…all acts of sexual violence are horrific. We should all be fighting to end it here at home and all around the world. So, while the resolution on the floor today rightfully denounces any sexual violence by Hamas, I am disturbed that it completely ignores and erases any sexual violence and abuse committed by Israeli forces against Palestinians, especially children. War crimes cannot justify more war crimes. We must stand up for everyone’s safety and human rights, no matter their faith, no matter their ethnicity. There are numerous, well-documented reports of sexual violence, including rape, committed by Israeli forces against Palestinians in their custody; children detained and stripped to their underwear in public for the world to see. Mr. Speaker, I call your attention to a Haaretz article titled: ‘Cigarette Burns, Beatings, Attempted Sexual Assault: Settlers and Soldiers Abuse Palestinians…The U.N. and human rights groups have raised alarms for years, but Congress did nothing. They never cared. We all have a responsibility to denounce sexual violence in all forms, regardless of who is responsible. This resolution falls well short of that responsibility…” Full floor comments/grandstanding around this resolution is here.

(TARGETING SOUTH AFRICA) HR 7256: Introduced 2/6/24 by James (R-MI) and Moskowitz (D-FL), “To require a full review of the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa.”  Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Last week I noted that while there was at that time no text available of the bill yet online, and neither James nor Moskowitz had issued a press release, it seemed there is a good chance this legislation was linked to South Africa’s case at the ICJ accusing Israel of engaging in genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Turns out it is exactly that! See James’s press release –  John James Introduces U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act [“I am proud to lead the U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act in the House with my Democrat colleague Jared Moskowitz. South Africa has been building ties to countries and actors that undermine America’s national security and threaten our way of life through its military and political cooperation with China and Russia and its support of U.S.-designated terrorist organization Hamas. Under this current administration, America has been put last, leaving our allies and partners beholden to dictators and despots in Beijing and Moscow for critical needs like energy. To ensure America’s energy security and national security, we must examine our alliances and disentangle from those who remain willing to work with our adversaries.”]. Also see: BREAKING: US congress receives bill to review SA relations following ‘politically motivated’ ICJ case

 

2. Letters

Gaza, Hostages, & Humanitarian Aid

Targeting UNRWA & Its Supporters

US $$ & Weapons to Israel

Targeting Academia/Free Speech [aka, the new McCarthyism in action!]

Speaker Johnson’s Bigoted Buddy

  • 2/15/24: Huffman, Raskin, Pocan Decry Speaker Johnson’s Bigoted, Christian Nationalist Guest Chaplain [letter text] – “At a time of rising antisemitism, Hibbs also disparages Jews as being in a ‘stupor’ and a ‘God-given blindness,” unlike the ‘true Jews’ who worship Jesus because ‘they didn’t get bogged down in Judaism, which…cannot save you.’ He also recently argued that the Israel-Hamas war is another sign of the End Times and that Jewish people must save themselves by turning to Jesus; if they do, he urges Christians to ‘look past the sins of Israel and the sins of the Jew and give them the hope of Jesus.‘”

 

3. Massive Supplemental Aid for Israel Takes Center Stage

On 2/13/24 — after a long, convoluted process that started last week and continued over the weekend — the Senate passed HR 815, after first deleting the full text of the bill and replacing it with S. Amdt. 1388, the bipartisan “Emergency National Security Supplemental legislation.

Amendments proposed to S. Amdt. 1388

As noted above, none of the amendments proposed to S. Amdt. 1388 (except for a couple of technical amendments) were passed. That said, it is still worth taking a look at Israel/Palestine/Middle East-related amendments that were offered, to get a sense of the issues Senators are focusing on (or believe it is beneficial to grandstand on) right now, and to get a preview of legislation/initiatives that are likely to come up in the future, either on their own or in efforts to attach them to other legislation. It is also worth noting that the handful of amendments seeking to block or condition military aid to Israel, while they didn’t pass or even get consideration on the Senate floor, are nonetheless remarkable. The idea that a substantial number of Democrats would cosponsor amendments of this nature is reflective of an undeniable shift in how Israel issues play in the Democratic party and in the Senate.

Targeting UNRWA, THE UN &/or Aid to Gaza or Aid to Palestinians in General (aka, the cruelty is the point)

  • S. Amdt. 1596: Offered by Lee (R-UT), to prohibit any funds in the bill from being “made available for assistance to Gaza.” [as in, barring $$ to UNRWA isn’t enough – gotta bar ALL funds to Gaza as it is undergoing genocide and a humanitarian catastrophe]
  • S. Amdt. 1595: Offered by Scott (R-FL), to add a section prohibiting any US funding from this bill or prior SFOPS bills from being used for any purpose in Gaza until the President certifies that (a) no aid will go to anyone in any way tied to or “influenced”, and (2) that all hostages taken to Gaza by any FTO have been freed. So in effect, US aid to starving, displaced, sick, injured  people would be contingent on (a) thorough security vetting – in a war zone – of every single needy man/woman/child — something that is quite literally impossible; and (b) Hamas et al releasing hostages – something which starving, displaced, sick civilians have no control over at all – in effect legislating US collective punishment against starving, displaced, sick, injured civilians, including children, in Gaza. The amendment would also bar US funding to Gaza through any UN entity “unless the President certifies to the congressional committees referred to in subsection (b) that such entity or office is not encouraging or teaching anti-Israel or anti-Semitic ideas or propaganda.”
  • S. Amdt. 1590: Offered by Scott (R-SC) and Cruz (R-TX) to bar any/all US funding to “any organ, agency, or entity of the United Nations” until (a) UNRWA is abolished, (b) the UN completes “counterterrorism vetting” of “all United Nations employees and contractors operating in the original jurisdiction of the UNRWA” and (c) the Secretary of State certifies to Congress that the UN and anybody receiving UN funding “do not teach, promote, or include in materials, such as textbooks and other instructional materials, any content that promotes antisemitism or encourages violence or intolerance toward other countries or ethnic groups.” Also requires a report to Congress on how UNRWA’s responsibilities have been “absorbed” by other UN programs/organizations; “a plan to ensure all United Nations funds, programs, specialized agencies, and organizations implement and maintain stringent counterterrorism vetting standards”; and “a plan to ensure all United Nations funds, programs, specialized agencies, and organizations implement and maintain stringent oversight of educational material and curriculum that prohibits all content that promotes antisemitism or encourages violence or intolerance toward other countries or ethnic groups.
  • S. Amdt. 1544: Offered by Lee (R-UT) to bar funding for Gaza (in addition to bar on aid to UNRAWA) under other categories of US assistance that might otherwise be used to help populations undergoing humanitarian catastrophes (i.e., International Disaster Assistance, Migration and Refugee Assistance, International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement, and International Development Association)
  • S. Amdt. 1542: Offered by Scott (R-FL) to add a section prohibiting any US funding from this bill or prior SFOPS bills from being used for any purpose in Gaza until the President certifies that (a) no aid will go to anyone in any way tied to or “influenced”, and (2) that all hostages taken to Gaza by any FTO have been freed. So in effect, US aid to starving, displaced, sick, injured  people would be contingent on (a) thorough security vetting – in a war zone – of every single needy man/woman/child — something that is quite literally impossible; and (b) Hamas et al releasing hostages – something which starving, displaced, sick civilians have no control over at all – in effect legislating US collective punishment against starving, displaced, sick, injured civilians, including children, in Gaza. The amendment would also bar US funding to Gaza through any UN entity “unless the President certifies to the congressional committees referred to in subsection (b) that such entity or office is not encouraging or teaching anti-Israel or anti-Semitic ideas or propaganda.”
  • S. Amdt. 1534: Offered by Blackburn (R-TN), to prohibit any assistance for Gaza “until all of the hostages taken on October 7, 2023, by Hamas have been released.” [something which starving, displaced, sick civilians have no control over at all, so in effect legislating US collective punishment against starving, displaced, sick, injured civilians, including children, in Gaza.]
  • S. Amdt. 1533: Offered by Blackburn (R-TN), to bar funding in the act to the UN or any UN agency or affiliate “until Hamas, Hezbollah, and all other Iranian proxies involved in terroristic activities are included on the United Nations Security Council Consolidated List.
  • S. Amdt. 1526: Offered by Tuberville (R-AL), to prohibit funding using any USAID funding in the bill for assistance to Gaza (in addition to the ban on aid to UNRWA).
  • S. Amdt. 1523: Offered by Tuberville (R-AL) to prohibit the use of any funding in the bill for “any organization that operates in Gaza.” [So basically, can’t use a dime for Gaza, cuz gotta work with orgs operating in Gaza to get it there but ALSO would punish orgs operating in Gaza by prohibiting US aid to them for work anywhere in the world – nice, right?]
  • S. Amdt. 1454: Offered by Ricketts (R-NE) and Scott (R-SC) to amend existing law to permanently bar US funding to UNRWA.
  • S. Amdt. 1448: Offered by Lee (R-UT) to expand the bill’s ban on aid to UNRWA to include barring funding “to any other organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations that provides funding or otherwise operates in Gaza, notwithstanding any other provision of law.
  • S. Amdt. 1402: Offered by Budd (R-NC) to bar any/all humanitarian aid for Gaza until all US citizens held by Hamas have been released [something which starving, displaced, sick civilians have no control over at all, so in effect legislating US collective punishment against starving, displaced, sick, injured civilians, including children, in Gaza.]
  • S. Amdt. 1399: Offered by Ernst (R-IA) to bar any/all US funding for both Gaza and the West Bank until all US citizens/permanent residents held hostage in Gaza have been released and remains of all US citizens/permanent residents have been returned to their families [something which starving, displaced, sick civilians have no control over at all, so in effect legislating US collective punishment against starving, displaced, sick, injured civilians, including children, in Gaza.]

Targeting Palestinians Refugees from Gaza (again, the cruelty is the point)

  • S. Amdt. 1522: Offered by Tuberville (R-AL) barring the US of funds in this bill for “the transportation, acceptance, or resettlement of refugees from Gaza to the United States.
  • S. Amdt. 1456: Offered by Rubio (R-FL) to make anyone implicated in the Oct 7, 2023 attacks on Israel ineligible for US immigration benefits (which to be clear is already the case under existing law).

No Recognition of Palestinian State

  • S. Amdt. 1524: Offered by Tuberville (R-AL) to bar the State Department from recognizing Palestine as a State [a purely grandstanding amendment, given that any such recognition would come from the President, not the State Department, and would clearly fall under the Executive’s foreign policy prerogative]
  • S. Amdt. 1521: Offered by Tuberville (R-AL), to require the President to use the US veto to block any effort at the UN Security Council to admit Palestine as a full member state in the UN [another purely grandstanding amendment, given that Congress does not have the authority to legislate such actions by the Executive, with actions to veto (or not) at the UNSC clearly falling under the Executive’s foreign policy prerogative]

Targeting States Supporting Palestinian Terror Orgs

  • S. Amdt. 1457: Offered by Rubio (R-FL) to add, a new piece of major legislation entitled, the “Hamas and Other Palestinian Terrorist Groups International Financing Prevention Act,” to impose mandatory sanctions on individuals or foreign states found to be aiding Palestinian terrorist organizations.

Keeping the Door Open for Potential Aid to UNRWA

  • S. Amdt. 1598: Offered by Van Hollen (D-MD) and 7 Democratic cosponsors, to replace the provision banning all aid to UNRWA with: “Sec. 614. (a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this division and division B of this Act and prior Acts making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs may be made available for a contribution, grant, or other payment to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency in Gaza, notwithstanding any other provision of law. (b) Certification.– (1) In general.–Subject to paragraph (2), the limitation on assistance under subsection (a) shall no longer apply if the President certifies that– (A) the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services has completed an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing by certain United Nations Relief and Works Agency employees; and (B) the United Nations has taken appropriate remedial action. (2) Notification.–Upon making a certification under paragraph (1), the President shall promptly notify the appropriate congressional committees in writing.

Putting Down Some Red (or maybe pink) Lines for US Policy Re Gaza, Incl Day After

  • S. Amdt. 1612: Offered by Merkley (D-OR) & Welch (D-VT) to add: “Sec. 709. Following the October 7, 2023 Hamas terror attacks from Gaza against Israel, it is the policy of the United States that– (1) Israel should be secure from terrorism and other violent attacks emanating from Gaza; (2) there should be no forcible displacement of Palestinians from Gaza; (3) Palestinians displaced during the war in Gaza since October 7, 2023, must be allowed to return to their homes; and (4) Israel should not reoccupy Gaza.
  • S. Amdt. 1395: Offered by Schatz (D-HI) and 48 cosponsors to add, “Sec. __. It is the policy of the United States– (1) to support a negotiated comprehensive solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states with Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace, security, dignity, and mutual recognition; and (2) that such a solution must ensure the state of Israel’s survival as a secure, democratic, and Jewish state, and fulfill the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a state of their own.

Putting Limits/Conditions on Military Aid to Israel

  • S. Amdt. 1462: Offered by Welch (D-VT) and 3 cosponsors, to prohibit using any funds in the bill “to support the procurement of, or for the transfer, inspection, assembly, testing, or shipment of any General Purpose Bombs (including Mk-84, Mk-83, Mk-82, BLU-113 bombs, GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs, and BLU-109 Hard Target Penetrator Bombs) for use in Gaza.” Also see Welch press release – Welch Files Amendment to National Security Supplemental Package Prohibiting Use of Taxpayer Dollars to Advance the Bombing Campaign on Gaza
  • S. Amdt. 1403: Offered by Warren (D-MA) and 4 cosponsors to add a new section entitled, “SEC. 709. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN HARM INCIDENT RESPONSE GUIDANCE.”
  • S. Amdt. 1397: Offered by Merkley (D-OR) and 9 cosponsors to bar the provision of firearms to Israel unless the Secretary of State that the firearms will: be used only by active members of the IDF and police; won’t be transferred to civilians; when used by reservists, will be returned to the IDF or police when those reserves have been deactivated; will be used in accordance with US law and US Conventional Arms Transfer Policy.” Also requires a report to Congress on the transfer of firearms to Israel, including “whether the firearms…were used in documented cases of violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank.” Also adds a new section: “Sec. 709. Following the October 7, 2023 Hamas terror attacks from Gaza against Israel, it is the policy of the United States that– (1) Israel should be secure from terrorism and other violent attacks emanating from Gaza; (2) there should be no forcible displacement of Palestinians from Gaza; (3) Palestinians displaced during the war must be allowed to return to their homes; (4) Israel should not reoccupy Gaza; (5) there should not be any reduction of the area or land of Gaza; and (6) there should not be a blockade on Gaza.”
  • S. Amdt. 1391: Offered by Sanders (I-VT) and Welch (D-VT), to eliminate funding in the bill for offensive weapons for Israel.
  • S. Amdt. 1389: Offered by Van Hollen (D-MD) and 18 cosponsors to add text requiring “(1) Compliance with international humanitarian law and law of armed conflict.–Any defense articles or defense services provided pursuant to this Act shall be used in accordance with international law, including international humanitarian law and the law of armed conflict, and United States law. (2) Compliance with prohibition on assistance to countries that restrict united states humanitarian assistance.

Other Stuff

  • S. Amdt. 1444: Offered by Lee (R-UT) to add, “Sec. __. None of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be made available to facilitate the use of military force against Iran, including any deployments to forward operating bases in Iraq and Syria, absent express authorization from Congress.”
  • S. Amdt. 1441: Offered by Lee (R-UT), to add, “Sec. __. Effective January 1, 2026, the following laws are hereby repealed: (1) The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 116 Stat. 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). (2) The Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).”

 

4. Hearings & Markups

February 15, 2024: POSTPONED — The House Foreign Affairs Committee was scheduled to hold a hearing entitled,The Agents of Antisemitism in Latin America.” The sole announced witness (so far) is Aaron Keyak, State Department Deputy Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.

February 14, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing entitled, “Iran’s Proxy in Yemen: The Houthi Threat to Middle East Stability, Global Shipping, and U.S. Servicemembers.” Witnesses were: Simone Ledeen, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East (statement); Kenneth Pollack, Former CIA Analyst and NSC Director for the Persian Gulf (statement); and Jon Alterman, Center for Strategic and International Studies (statement). Also see: hearing video

February 14, 2024: The House Committee on Financial Services held a hearing entitled, “Oversight of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI)“. Witnesses were  Undersecretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) Brian Nelson (statement) and Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Andrea Gacki (statement). Also see: hearing video; Jewish Insider 2/15/24: House lawmakers press Treasury Department on actions to counter Iran and Hamas

 

5. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics/Elex
Israel/Gaza & Congress

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Massive Supplemental Aid for Israel Takes Center Stage
4. Hearings & Markups
5. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New from FMEP

  • 2/7/24  – New episode of Occupied Thoughts podcast, Separation, Dehumanization, Theft of Time: A Day in the Life of Abed Salama, ft. FMEP Fellow Dr. Yara Asi speaks with Nathan Thrall, author of the recently-released A Day in the Life of Abed Salama: Anatomy of a Jerusalem Tragedyabout the systems of separation and dehumanization in Jerusalem and the West Bank, Israeli state violence, and what has and hasn’t changed in Israel/Palestine over the last four months.

Note: On 2/6/24 the Congressional Research Services released an updated version of its report: Israel and Hamas Conflict In Brief: Overview, U.S. Policy, and Options for Congress

 

1. Bills & Resolutions (Except related to supplemental aid for Israel)

Targeting UNRWA

  • (UNRWA = TERRORISM; NO $$$ FOR UNRWA) HR 7202 (text): [not covered in last week’s round-up – wasn’t posted in the Congressional Record at the time I published] Introduced 2/1/24 by Jackson (R-TX) and 7 Republican cospsonsors, “To direct the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a report on funding provided by the United States to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), and for other purposes.” aka, the “Uncovering UNRWA’s Terrorist Crimes Act.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Jackson press release – Rep. Jackson Introduces Legislation to Uncover UNRWA’s Terrorist Crimes
  • (TARGETING UNRWA) H. Con. Res. 88: Introduced 2/6/24 by Burchett (R-TN), “Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury should investigate the use of cryptocurrencies by Hamas (also known as Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya), and whether any cryptocurrencies were exchanged between Hamas and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.Referred to the Committees on Financial Services and Foreign Affairs.

Targeting Free Speech & Academia

  • (TARGETING FREE SPEECH/PALESTINIAN RIGHTS ACTIVISM ON CAMPUS) HR 7231: Introduced 2/5/24 by Malliotakis (R-NY), “To prohibit Federal support for institutions of higher education that promote antisemitism, and for other purposes,” aka, the “Combatting Antisemitic Messaging & Promoting Unity in School Act (CAMPUS Act). Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Also see: press release – Malliotakis Introduces Legislation to Combat Rising Antisemitism on College Campuses
  • (TARGETING STUDENTS & PALESTINIAN RIGHTS ACTIVISM ON CAMPUS) HR 7232: Introduced 2/5/24 by Malliotakis (R-NY), “To direct the Secretary of State to revoke the visas of students who have engaged in antisemitic activities, and for other purposes,” aka, the “No Visas for Antisemitic Students Act.”  Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Also see: press release – Malliotakis Introduces Legislation to Combat Rising Antisemitism on College Campuses

Other

  • (NO DEFENSE EXPORTS TO TURKIYE) S. J. Res. 60: Introduced 2/5/24 by Paul (R-KY), “A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Turkiye of certain defense articles and services.” Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (All Actions)

Keeping on eye on

  • (TARGETING SOUTH AFRICA) HR 7256: Introduced 2/6/24 by James (R-MI) and Moskowitz (D-FL), “To require a full review of the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa.”  Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. NOTE: there’s no text available as of this writing, and neither James nor Moskowitz have issued a press release, but it seems there is a good chance this legislation is linked to South Africa’s case at the ICJ accusing Israel of engaging in genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
  • (POSSIBLY TARGETING CRITICISM OF ISRAEL) HR 7277: Introduced 2/7/24 by D’Esposito (R-NY) and 3 bipartisan cosponsors, “To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the time of imprisonment for an additional offense involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.”  Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. NOTE: there’s no text available as of this writing, and nobody involved has issued a press release, so it’s not clear what this is about…but in the current climate, definitely worth watching…

 

2. Letters (except related to supplemental aid for Israel)

Targeting UNRWA

Targeting Academia & Civil Society

Targeting…Woke USG Regulations (seriously)

  • [IT’S LIKE THE ONION IS WRITING THESE LETTERS…] 2/7/24: Rubio, Colleagues to Blinken: Wokeness is Undermining U.S. Foreign Assistance [letter text] [Excerpt: “We are further concerned with the proposed waiver requirement for religious organizations to employ individuals of their own faith or to carry out foreign assistance activities in a manner consistent with their sincerely held beliefs. This would place a substantial burden upon faith-based groups and allow State Department a veto on questions of whether Jewish organizations can bar pro-Hamas individuals from employment, or whether Muslim organizations are allowed to only distribute halal food assistance. Accordingly, we request responses to the following questions about the proposed regulations: Will the State Department require a waiver from Jewish organizations that refuse to employ a pro-Hamas, or other extremist group member, who advocates for the destruction of Israel?“]

Other stuff

 

3. Massive Supplemental Aid for Israel Takes Center Stage

This week both the House and Senate took up legislation that would have provided massive supplemental funding for Israel.

Supplemental Emergency Aid for Israel — Action in the House

Background: Back on 11/2/23, the House passed a bill to provide massive emergency funding and military resources to Israel: HR 6126 (covered in detail in the 11/3/24 edition of the Round-Up). That bill passed with 12 Democrat joining 214 Republicans in voting YES, and 2 Republicans joining 194 Democrats in voting NO. It was also dead-on-arrival in the Senate, because (a) it includes funding ONLY for Israel – while the Biden Administration has made clear it wants emergency supplemental legislation to include funding for Ukraine, new border security legislation, and a modicum of humanitarian aid – and (b) it made the funding for Israel conditional on offsets, in the form of cuts in funding to the IRS (notably, this Republican-drafted, -led, -supported legislation, represents the first time in history that the House has passed legislation imposing a concrete condition on aid to Israel – a point pro-Israel advocacy forces have, fascinatingly, chosen to ignore). As a reminder, in late October then new-House speaker Johnson (R-LA), explicitly stated that any emergency supplemental funding would be have to be paid for by cuts in funding to other programs.

This week: On 2/3/24 – and in the context of efforts in the Senate to craft a bipartisan compromise covering supplemental funding and border legislation – Speaker Johnson circulated a letter announcing his plans to introduce/pass a“clean” bill providing emergency supplemental aid for Israel (a “clean” bill is one that includes no extraneous provisions, including conditions). On 2/5/24, that bill was introduced as HR 7217 (press release).  Like its predecessor (HR 6216), HR 7217 provides funding ONLY for Israel. But unlike HR 6216, this bill does not make the Israel funding conditional on cuts in funding to the IRS or anything else (no offsets). Also see: House to vote on clean Israel aid bill this week: Johnson (Jewish Insider 2/3/24);  New Israel supplemental readied in House, without offsets [Package intended to pressure Senate as it prepares broader bill] (Roll Call 2/3/24); House GOP plans new Israel package in blow to Senate talks (Axios 2/3/24)

What’s in HR 7217? HR 7217 would provide massive funding and military resources to Israel, as follows:

  • The bill includes $9.7 billion in direct aid to Israel: $4 billion for Iron Dome and David’s Sling; $1.2 billion for Iron Beam; $3.5 billion in Foreign Military Financing (cash to buy stuff); and $1 billion “to enhance production and development of artillery and critical munitions.” As an extra bonus, the bill allows for the FULL $3.5 billion in FMF to be spent in Israel (as opposed to in the US, as is the standard requirement with FMF – and as a reminder, defenders of the massive annual US aid package to Israel are always quick to argue that the funds are not a hand-out to Israel, but rather are an investment in the U.S. economy – an argument that this bill shut down). The bill also authorizes SecState to waive congressional notification requirements (it’s Israel – who needs oversight?)
  • For 2024, the bill removes all limits on Israel taking defense articles from US stockpiles (which explains why the bill also includes $4.4 billion “to replenish defense articles and defense services provided to Israel” — in effect making clear that this is another $4.4 billion worth of aid for Israel. Also, the fact that Congress seems unconcerned about the national security implications of the US allowing Israel to substantially deplete if not empty US military stockpiles is remarkable, to say the least).
  • In addition, the bill provides $3.3 billion “for current U.S. military operations in the region in response to the October 7th attack“; $150 million for enhanced embassy security and protection for U.S. personnel; and $50 million for emergency evacuations of American citizens.
  • The bill does not include $1 of aid for Palestinians in Gaza, or any acknowledgement that nearly the entire population of Gaza has been displaced, with tens of thousands injured, and the entire population beginning to starve to death and die from lack of medical care.
  • And finally, the bill (of course) includes not a single word about oversight/reporting/conditions/concerns/limits on how Israel uses US weapons, or Israel’s policies/intentions in Gaza or WB, etc.

Where folks stood on HR 7217:

  • House GOP — HR 7217 was immediately attacked by some Republicans. On 2/4/24, the Freedom Caucus (House Republicans issued a statement opposing HR 7217 due to the lack of offsetting cuts to domestic programs — Support Israel without Bankrupting America [“Congress can pay for Israel aid by cutting funding for the United Nations, repealing the IRS expansion, rescinding the Department of Commerce ‘slush fund,’ or ending leftist climate change tax credits.”]) Also see: House Freedom Caucus ‘extremely disappointed’ with Speaker Johnson’s stand-alone Israel aid bill (Washington Examiner 2/4/24).
  • White House — On 2/5/24, the White House issued a Statement of Administration Policy opposing HR 7217 and promising to veto it if it made it to the president’s desk.
  • House Democrats — On 2/6/24, House Democratic leaders published a Joint Leadership Dear Colleague on H.R. 7217, stating (among other things), “We are prepared to support any serious, bipartisan effort in connection with the special relationship between the United States and Israel, our closest ally in the Middle East. Unfortunately, the standalone legislation introduced by House Republicans over the weekend, at the eleventh hour without notice or consultation, is not being offered in good faith. Rather, it is a nakedly obvious and cynical attempt by MAGA extremists to undermine the possibility of a comprehensive, bipartisan funding package that addresses America’s national security challenges in the Middle East, Ukraine, the Indo-Pacific region and throughout the world.” The letter closes: “…the time has come for House Republicans to end the political stunts and come together in support of a comprehensive approach to our national security priorities. For the aforementioned reasons, and those powerfully articulated by President Joe Biden in the Statement of Administration Policy, we will vote NO on H.R. 7217.” Overall, reactions of House Democrats were mixed, with some clearly focused on rationalizing casting a vote in support of Israel aid, despite opposition from Democratic leadership and the White House. Also see: House Democrats in “tough spot” with GOP’s new Israel bill (Axios 2/3/24); House Democrats open to supporting GOP’s stand-alone Israel aid bill (The Forward 2/5/24); Democratic leaders oppose Israel aid bill, imperiling its odds (Roll Call 2/6/24)

HR 7217 FAILS in the House: On 2/6/24 HR 7217 was brought to the House floor under suspension of the rules. By bringing the bill to the floor via this route (skipping the normal process in which a bill is first referred to the committee(s) of jurisdiction, where there would be markups and opportunities for amendments, and only then the bill would be brought to the floor under an agreed-on rule allowing for additional amendments), the bill (a) was not subject to any amendments, and (b) required a 2/3 majority to pass (rather than the simple majority required for bills brought to the floor under normal rules). As a result, the House vote on HR 7217 – 250 in favor and 180 against – meant that the bill FAILED to pass. Forty-six Democrats defied the White House to support HR 7217, and 14 Republicans defied their leadership to oppose it.

Further reading: House GOP fails to pass Israel package as congressional impasse continues (Washington Post), Israel aid bill sinks in House with 166 Democrats, 14 Republicans against (Fox News), House fails to pass standalone Israel aid bill (Politico), House torpedoes stand-alone Israel aid bill (The Hill), House fails to pass Israel aid amid Ukraine standoff with Biden (Defense News), Congress scrambles for backup plan on Ukraine and Israel aid (Axios), Aid package for Israel fails in the House, dealing another setback to GOP leaders (AP), US House rejects Republican-led effort to pass Israel-only aid bill (Reuters), GOP stand-alone Israel aid bill rejected in the House  (Roll Call), Biden and Dem Leaders Reject Stand-Alone Aid Bill for Israel

More Israel Aid Legislation in the House: HR 7217 is clearly not the end of this saga. Two more Israel aid bills were intro’d in the House this week:

  • HR 7271: Introduced 2/7/24 by Biggs (R-AZ), “Making emergency supplemental appropriations to respond to the attacks in Israel for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.” Per Biggs’s press release: “Today, Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) introduced the Fiscally Responsible Israel Supplemental Act, 2024—legislation that would provide $17.6 billion in military and security assistance to Israel and pay for that spending by repealing the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA)’s Department of Commerce and IRS “slush fund” created during debt ceiling negotiations last summer. This assistance includes funding to reinforce Israel’s defense systems, replenish U.S. military operations in the region, and protect U.S. personnel and citizens in Israel. On October 7th, Hamas terrorists infiltrated Israel and massacred more than 1,400 Israelis, while taking hundreds more hostage over the month. Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted against a security supplemental for Israel as the package offered no spending offsets to fund the aid.”]
  • HR 7245: Introduced 2/6/24 by Goldman (D-NY) and 4 Democratic cosponsors, “To provide supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes.” Text is not yet available but best guess is that this is similar or identical to the Senate text currently under consideration (discussed below), which of course means it has zero chance of going anywhere in the House.

 

Supplemental Emergency Aid for Israel — Action in the Senate

On 2/4/24 Senate Democrats unveiled their BIPARTISAN Emergency National Security Supplemental legislation, including both massive funding/equipment for Israel and a cut-off of aid to UNRWA (press release; text; summary). Appropriations Chair Murry (D-WA) stated in her press release: “I never believed we should link policy demands to emergency aid for our allies, but Republicans insisted—so Democrats negotiated in good faith over many weeks and now there is a bipartisan deal on border policy legislation. Ukraine’s fate and so much more hangs in the balance—it’s time for Congress to act.”  Israel and related provisions of the bill are as follows:

  • DOD funding/programs: The bill provides $10.6 billion in Department of Defense funding for Israel, of which $801.400 million is for ammunition; $5.2 billion is for Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Iron Beam; and the balance is included in Israel/Ukraine joint line items
  • SFOPS funding/programs: The bill provides $3.5 billion in Foreign Military Financing (cash) for Israel to buy weapons/military supplies. Normally FMF has to be spent in the US (FMF for Israeli is always defended as not a handout to Israel but an investment in the US economy!), but under this bill, Israel has full authorization to spend $769.3 million in Israel, and has further authorization to spend the rest in Israel, “if agreed by the United States and Israel, following consultation with the Committees on Appropriations.” In addition, the bill authorizes the Secretary of State to skip Congressional notification of arms sales under this FMF (Congressional oversight of massive arms sales to Israel while it is carrying out ethnic cleansing/genocide in Gaza? Totally not necessary!).
  • Emptying US Weapons Stockpiles: Sections 602-606 of the bill would amend U.S. law governing use of US weapons stockpiles (for 2024 only) to massively increase the amounts of U.S. stockpiled weapons (which are stockpiled around the world ostensibly to ensure U.S. readiness in the event of a military crisis) the President can give to Israel. For example, Section 602 increases a cap on the value of weapons available to Israel from stockpiles from $100 million to $7.8 billion. The bill would also waive congressional notification requirements with respect to Israel taking weapons from US stockpiles in 2024.
  • What about the Palestinians? The bill provides a total of $9.2 billion in humanitarian aid, including “to address humanitarian needs in response to the situations in Israel and Ukraine for Ukraine,” but does not earmark a single dollar specifically for Palestinians. Yet, the bill does explicitly bar any funding to UNRWA, including funds approved in prior laws but not yet disbursed (Section 614) and adds multiple new layers of oversight/conditions/monitoring/reporting on any funds that the administration might decide to use for Palestinians (in Section 615) – layers on top of what was already the most overseen/conditioned/monitored/reported on US aid program in the world. In short, this utterly surreal bill embraces the conflation of the entire Palestinian population of the West Bank and Gaza Strip – more than 2 million of whom currently being subjected to ethnic cleansing and genocide by Israel in Gaza – with terrorism, and the linkage of the provision of aid to Palestinians — currently being displaced, wounded, deliberately starved and denied medical care by Israel — with support for terror.
  • Messages of this bill: Like the House bill detailed above, the Senate bill includes not a single condition, no does it require even a single report on how Israel is using US weapons in Gaza. This is of course in line with all past appropriations bills for Israel – no conditions, no restrictions, no special oversight, etc.. But what is different today is that in the context of Israel’s actions in the Gaza Strip (and the West Bank) since October 7, 2023, a significant number of Senate Democrats have come out DEMANDING conditions on aid to Israel (and also urging strong support for humanitarian aid for Palestinians). Their demands were simply ignored by Senate leaders negotiating this bipartisan bill, while those same leaders chose to heed demands of Republican senators to de-fund UNRWA (for more on this last point see this excellent X-thread from the Middle East Democracy Center’s Seth Binder). The bottom line, loud-and-clear messages of this bill: (1) there is zero interest/concern in what Israel does with US weapons, or intends to do with respect to Gaza, the two-state solution, or what Netanyahu or his fellow officials do or say with respect to ethnic cleansing/genocide of Palestinians; (2) to the extent that there is any concern about the humanitarian catastrophe facing Palestinians in Gaza, it is entirely offset by deference to Israeli efforts to undermine UNRWA, to paint every Palestininian in Gaza as a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer, and to stall, obstruct, control, and politicize any efforts to provide aid to Palestinians; and (3) that it is a bipartisan article of fate that it’s always good politics to sh*t on Palestinians – even Palestinians who literally starving to death as the Senate debates this bill, and even when we are talking about the bodies of Palestinians who are dead or dying due to Israeli policies of ethnic cleansing and genocide.

How did this bill get introduced/come to the floor? Under the arcane rules of Congress, appropriations bills (including supplementals) must be initiated by the House (the Senate initiates authorization bills). As a result, rather than introduce the Israel et al supplemental as a new Senate bill, Senate leaders are using an existing House bill as their vehicle (akin to a hermit crab moving into an available shell).  The vehicle chosen by Senate leadership for its Israel et al emergency supplement is HR 815, a bill previously passed by the House and currently pending in the Senate. Repurposing HR 815 started on 2/7/24, when Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Murray (D-WA) proposed S. Amdt. 1388 to HR 815 – an amendment in the nature of a substitute (aka, an ANS) that would delete the full text of HR 815 and replace it with the Israel et al emergency supplemental appropriations legislation. Other senators have subsequently introduced (so far – they can and almost certainly will keep introducing more) 64 amendments to Murray’s amendment, including

  • an amendment from Lee (R-UT) to bar all funding not just to UNRWA but “to any other organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations that provides funding or otherwise operates in Gaza“;
  • an amendment from Van Hollen (D-MD) and 18 cosponsors, to add in a section entitled, “SAFEGUARDS AND ACCOUNTABILITY WITH RESPECT TO TRANSFERRED DEFENSE ARTICLES AND DEFENSE SERVICES”, which among other things would require a report to Congress regarding use of U.S. provided defense articles and services, including an assessment of “the extent to which the use of such defense articles or defense services is consistent with United States practices and mechanisms for minimizing civilian casualties.
  • an amendment from Shatz (D-HI) and 48 cosponsors, adding in a provision reading: “It is the policy of the United States– (1) to support a negotiated comprehensive solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states with Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace, security, dignity, and mutual recognition; and (2) that such a solution must ensure the state of Israel’s survival as a secure, democratic, and Jewish state, and fulfill the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a state of their own.
  • an amendment from Merkley (D-MA) and 9 cosponsors, to add a section stipulating that (among other things), “None of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available by this division may be obligated or expended to facilitate the commercial export, foreign military sale, transfer, or delivery of any firearms, including pistols and semi-automatic and fully automatic rifles, to Israel, unless the Secretary of State certifies to Congress that the Secretary has received written assurance from the Government of Israel that– (1) such firearms– (A) will be used only by active duty members of the Israel Defense Forces and the Israel National Police; and (B) will not be transferred to civilians; (2) any such firearms used by activated reserves of the Israel Defense Forces or the Israel National Police will be returned to the Israel Defense Forces or the Israel National Police once those reserves have been deactivated; and (3) such firearms will be used in accordance with United States law and the United States Conventional Arms Transfer Policy.”
  • an amendment from Ernst (R-IA) barring any/all aid for the West Bank and Gaza until “(1) All citizens and permanent residents of the United States are released from captivity in Gaza to the United States, Israel, or another country of the individual’s choice. (2) The remains of all citizens and permanent residents of the United States are returned to their families.” [i.e., embracing collective punishment of more than 2 million Palestinians currently being starved to death by Israel]
  • an amendment from Budd (R-NC) barring any/all aid for the West Bank and Gaza “until all citizens of the United States held hostage by Hamas have been released.” [i.e., embracing collective punishment of more than 2 million Palestinians currently being starved to death by Israel]
  • an amendment from Warren (D-MA) and 4 cosponsors to add a section entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN HARM INCIDENT RESPONSE GUIDANCE.”
  • an amendment from Kaine (D-VA) and 27 cosponsors, to (as explained in his press release) “maintain the congressional notification requirement for all U.S. assistance to foreign militaries. Specifically, the amendment would strike a provision in the proposed national security supplemental funding bill that waives oversight requirements for U.S. funding for Israel under the Foreign Military Financing Program. If passed, the amendment would preserve the congressional notification process for Israel, just as congressional notifications are required for all other nations.” Also see: PBS 2/6/24: Senate Democrats push to require that Biden consult Congress on weapons sales to Israel; Kaine 2/8/24: VIDEO: Kaine Delivers Floor Speech on Amendment to Maintain Congressional Oversight of Foreign Military Assistance
  • An amendment from Sanders (I-VT) and one cosponsor to (as explained in his press release) “remove $10.1 billion in offensive weaponry funding for Netanyahu’s right-wing government. The amendment preserves funding for defensive systems that will protect Israeli civilians against incoming missile and rocket attacks.
  • An amendment from Sanders (I-VT) to delete the provision in the bill barring aid to UNRWA.
  • Also note: X-post by journalist from the DC Examiner 2/7/24:  “Senate Rs want open amendment process on Ukraine package. Here’s Cornyn, who I asked about humanitarian aid: ‘I don’t want to see so-called humanitarian assistance go to Hamas. And so, there’s a number of things that we’ll be suggesting by way of amendment or further debate.‘”

What Happened this week to the Israel et al supplemental in the Senate? This week saw 3 procedural votes in the Senate related to HR 815. On 2/7/23, following lengthy statements/grandstanding, a group of Senate Democrats called for a vote on “cloture motion” – a motion to bring to a close the discussion on whether or not HR 815 could be brought up for debate (passing the cloture motion would enable debate on HR 815 – starting with Murray’s ANS, to start). That motion FAILED by a vote of 49-50, with 4 Republicans voting “yes” and 5 Democrats plus Sanders (I-VT) voting “no.” Sen. Schumer (D-NY) immediately followed up this defeat by calling for a vote on a motion to “reconsider” the previous vote (as in, to agree to continue debate and try again for cloture another time). This motion PASSED by a vote of 58-41. Subsequently on 2/8/24, a group of Senate Democrats again called for a vote on another cloture motion. This motion PASSED by a vote of 67-32, opening the door for debate on the actual bill to begin.

So what happens next? In line with the Senate’s incredibly arcane and convoluted procedures, at any minute the Senate can/will start debating HR 815, which will kick off with another procedural “motion to proceed” with Murray’s ANS, S. Amdt. 1388. Assuming that passes, Senate leaders will be faced with a deluge of amendments (both on Israel and on other issues), and intense pressure to allow a large number of amendments to be heard and voted on (including from senators who are looking to run out the legislative clock in order to kill the bill). It’s not clear at this point how that will work out. At some point Schumer will try to end that debate (another cloture motion) to open the way for a final vote on S. Amdt. 1388 (as amended by anything that the Senate has managed to pass), and after that a final vote on the bill. And just to make things more complicated: note that cloture votes need at least 60 votes to pass, while other votes need a simple majority.  For more details on how this is expected to play out, see this explainer from Punchbowl news. Also see: Senate votes to begin deliberations on Israel aid bill – The Senate voted 67-32 to open debate on a bill supporting Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan but likely has long days of deliberations ahead (Jewish Insider 2/9/24) Also note that there is a “Plan B” already in play (raised on the Senate floor 2/7/24) – Senate aims for slimmed-down foreign aid package without border policy deal -Senators are negotiating to take up an Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan aid bill with negotiated border policy provisions stripped out (Jewish Insider 2/8/24)

 

4. Hearings & Markups

February 15, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing entitled, The Agents of Antisemitism in Latin America. The sole announced witness (so far) is Aaron Keyak, State Department Deputy Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism.

February 14, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing entitled, “Iran’s Proxy in Yemen: The Houthi Threat to Middle East Stability, Global Shipping, and U.S. Servicemembers.” Scheduled witnesses will be: Simone Ledeen, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East; Kenneth Pollack, Former CIA Analyst and NSC Director for the Persian Gulf; and Jon Alterman, Center for Strategic and International Studies.

February 6, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee held a markup of various measures (video). During this markup they passed:

  • HR 6603, the “No Technology for Terror Act,” aka, “To apply foreign-direct product rules to Iran.
  • HR 6046, “To designate Ansarallah as a foreign terrorist organization and impose certain sanctions on Ansarallah, and for other purposes” [as noted in the 10/27/23 edition of the Round-Up, Congress does not have the legal authority to designate groups as FTOs…]; and
  • HR 7122,To prohibit aid that will benefit Hamas, and for other purposes.” As covered in last week’s Round-Up — (DEATH TO UNRWA! NO MORE PALESTINE REFUGEES!) HR 7122 (text): Introduced 1/29/24 by Smith (R-NJ) and 3 Republican cosponsors, the “Stop Support for UNRWA Act of 2024“, aka, “To prohibit aid that will benefit Hamas, and for other purposes.” This bill states: “The United States may not make any voluntary or involuntary contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (referred to in this Act as ‘‘UNRWA’’), to any successor or related entity, or to the regular budget of the United Nations for the support of UNRWA or a successor entity.

 

5. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics & Elex

Israel’s War on Gaza, UNRWA, Civil Society, Free Speech

Targeting Free Speech & Civil Society

Targeting Biden Admin Policy on Israel/Settlements

 

 

 

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. The Campaign to Kill UNRWA Heats Up
4. Hearings & Markups
5. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New from FMEP

 

1. Bills & Resolutions (Except related to UNRWA)

(BARRING TERRORISTS – & PLO “MEMBERS” & THEIR FAMILIES – FROM ENTERING THE US) HR 6679: Introduced 12/7/23 by McClintock (R-CA) and having no cosponsors, the “No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act,” aka, “To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to aliens who carried out, participated in, planned, financed, supported, or otherwise facilitated the attacks against Israel.” Reported out of the Judiciary Committee 1/25/24; passed by the House 1/31/24 by a vote of 422-2 with 1 voting present. No votes were Bush (D-MO) and Tlaib (D-MI); voting present was Ramirez (D-IL). NOTE: As the title suggests, this legislation amends existing law to bar entry to the US to people who participated in the October 7th Hamas attacks on Israel (a category that includes people who are not members of Hamas). But not mentioned in the title: this bill also expands current law to bar entry to the U.S. of ANY MEMBER of the PLO — an organization that NOBODY has argued had anything to do with the October 7th attacks. If passed into law, this bill would in effect mean that every Palestinian associated with the PLO (including any member of Fatah, the party of Mahmoud Abbas), as well as their spouses and children, would be barred from entering the US without a special exception made by the Secretary of State and notified to Congress. So yes, in the name of punishing Hamas (and Islamic Jihad) for the October 7th attacks, the House has voted in effect to impose new, far-reaching sanctions against the PLO and Fatah. Floor discussion of the bill is here. Note that Democrats mischaracterized the bill as “redundant” – which is true with respect to barring entry to Hamas and Islamic Jihad. It is NOT true with respect to expanding sanctions on the PLO. That is an extraordinary expansion of an archaic, mindlessly punitive piece of law (adopted before the Oslo process and never repealed, because Congress never, ever, repeals anti-Palestinian measures, no matter how circumstance may change. If passed into law will have hugely damaging impact on the ability of a universe of Palestinians, who will find themselves suddenly treated as terrorists under US immigration law, for the crime of being associated with an organization that not only is NOT a US-designated FTO and is not accused of involved in Oct 7 or any other terrorist attacks, but that has been a U.S. partner (in a relationship that is sometimes cooler, sometimes warmer) for the past 30 years. Just stunning (but actually makes sense for those in Congress who are already thinking of a “day after” the current war on Gaza, and foreseeing a new Middle East order in which Israel no longer sees a need for Palestinian partners. Also see: Palestine slams passage of bill by American Congress to ban entry of PLO members to US – Previously, only PLO officials could not enter US but current bill extends ban to all members (Andalou 2/1/24); Bush, Tlaib vote against bill barring Oct. 7 attackers from the U.S. (Jewish Insider 1/31/24); Tlaib, Cori Bush vote to allow Oct. 7 attackers into US (Jewish News Syndicate 2/1/24 – in headline that is 100% inaccurate, since current law already bans Hamas & PIJ members from entering US]

(EVERY DAY IS A GOOD DAY TO ATTACKING THE PALESTINIANS AUTHORITY!) S. 3707 [text]: Introduced 1/31/24 by Kennedy (R-LA) and Paul (R-KY), “A bill to require the Secretary of State to submit annual reports reviewing the educational material used by the Palestinian Authority in schools, and for other purposes,” aka, the “the Peace and Tolerance in Palestinian Education Act.” Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.  Also see: press release – Kennedy introduces bill countering antisemitism in Palestinian classrooms NOTE: This is the Senate version of HR 3266, introduced 5/11/23 by Schneider (D-IL) and 34 cosponsors and passed by the House 11/1/23 by voice vote. As I noted in the 11/3/23 edition of the Round-Up, “This is legislation that in effect codifies the argument that Palestinians’ negative feelings about and toward Israel/Israelis/Zionism are caused — apparently solely, since no other causes are even hinted at — by textbooks that teach them to feel that way. As opposed to the analysis (which I’m sure backers of this bill would deem antisemitic) that the feeling are the result of, oh, I don’t know, THE WAY PALESTINIANS – INCLUDING KIDS – ARE TREATED BY ISRAEL/ISRAELIS EVERY DAY OF THEIR LIVES, WITH NO HOPE FOR EVER ACHIEVING RIGHTS, OR FREEDOM, OR DIGNITY. This bill requires a report to Congress reviewing all aspects of Palestinian curricula to assess how well the education system is doing in teaching Palestinian kids tolerance toward the peace/state that is systematically violating their rights. The fact that the House passed this bill [and now the Senate is introducing this bill] at a moment when Israel is slaughtering 1000s [at this point more than 13,000] of kids in Gaza (saving them I guess from becoming intolerant of Israel), when schools in Gaza are being used for Palestinians to take refuge in (and even then being bombed by Israel), and when in the West Bank Palestinian towns are on lockdown as settlers – supported and in some cases joined by IDF soldiers – are marauding through villages and forcing their residents to flee…”  And for  more than 3 months of the non-stop slaugher, including of children, Congress has done NOTHING to try to stop it, and most of Congress has actively defending Israel and supported sending Israel more weapons to do even more… Truly there is no bottom.

(MORE $$ FOR ISRAEL SUPPLEMENTAL) HR 7113: Introduced 1/29/24 by Moskowitz (R-FL), “Making emergency supplemental appropriations in line with the President’s request in response to the ongoing attack on Ukraine’s sovereignty by Russia and in response to the attacks in Israel for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.” Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on the Budget. For Israel, the bill provides $10.6 billion in emergency funding for Israel (broken down below); it would also suspends a provision of current law to allow Israel to draw unlimited supplies from US stockpiles in 2024:

  • operation and maintenance, defense-wide — $4,400,000,000
  • procurement of ammunition, army — $801,400,000
  • procurement, defense-wide — $4,000,000,000 (Iron Dome & David’s Sling)
  • defense production act purchases — $198,600,000
  • research, development, test and evaluation, defense-wide — $1,200,000,000 (Iron Beam)

(GAZA WAR? MEH. NEVER STOP PUSHING NORMALIZATION!) HR 7155: Introduced 1/31/24 by Harshbarger (R-TN) and 6 bipartisan cosponsors, “To provide for the establishment, within the Food and Drug Administration, of an Abraham Accords Bureau to promote and facilitate cooperation between the Food and Drug Administration and entities in Abraham Accords countries wishing to work with the agency in order to develop and sell products in the United States, and for other purposes.” Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

 

2. Letters (except related to UNRWA)

War on Gaza

Targeting Free Speech

Iran

Other

 

3. The Campaign to Kill UNRWA Heats Up

This week saw an all-0ut assault on UNRWA on Capitol Hill, including new legislation, a hearing (scheduled before Israel’s allegations that 12 UNRWA staff took place in 10/7 attacks were made public), letters, statements, & publicly-reported lobbying of members of Congress by Israeli officials. As a reminder: Congress has been gunning for UNRWA for more than a decade. From me: Congressional Attacks on UNRWA: A History (2000-2018); Taking Issues “Off the Table” – First Jerusalem, Now Refugees (Huffington Post 1/5/18); Legislating the Refugee Problem (Daily Beast 5/24/12)

(a) Legislation

  • (DEFUND UNRWA, PUNISH ALL WHO HAVE EVER BEEN AFFILIATED WITH UNRWA BY DEFINING UNRWA AS A TERRORIST ORG, & REVOKE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF UNRWA USA) S. 3723: Introduced 2/1/24 by Cotton (R-IN) and Cruz (R-TX), the “‘Defund United Nations Relief and Works Agency Act of 2024,” aka “A bill to prohibit funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and for other purposes.” Referred to the Committee on Finance. NOTE: This bill goes far beyond blocking US funding to UNRWA to attack/punish anyone who has ever worked for/with UNRWA, and to seek to impede private citizens from supporting UNRWA. It would: (a) bar any U.S. funding for UNRWA; (b) ban admittance to the U.S. of anyone who “is, or has ever been, affiliated with UNRAW” and revoke visas already issues to such people, by changing current law such that henceforth “any officer, official, representative, or spokesperson” of UNRWA would, by definition, be considered “to be engaged in a terrorist activity” (along with the same categories of people working for the PLO) – with the resulting sanctions also applying to spouses and children; and (c) revoke the tax exempt status of UNRWA USA.  Also see: press release – Cotton, Cruz: UNRWA Should Not Receive Another Dime of U.S. Funding
  • (NO US $$  TO THE UN UNTIL UNRWA IS DEAD & BURIED!) S. 3717 (text): Introduced 1/31/24 by Scott (R-SC) and Cruz (R-TX), “To prohibit United States voluntary contributions to the United Nations.” The legislation (after several pages of whereas clauses attacking UNRWA) states: “No funds may be provided as a voluntary or assessed contribution of the United States to the United Nations,  including any organ, agency, or entity of the United Nations until (1) UNRWA is abolished; (2) the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the that the United Nations has completed appropriate counter-terrorism vetting for all United Nations employees and contractors operating in the original jurisdiction of the UNRWA; and (3) the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the United Nations, including staff and facilities receiving United Nations funding, do not teach, promote, or include in materials, such as textbooks and other instructional materials, any content that promotes anti-semitism or encourages violence or intolerance toward other countries or ethnic groups.” Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. Also see: press release – Senators Scott, Cruz Introduce Bill to Cut Off U.S. Funding to the UN Until UNRWA is Abolished
  • (DEATH TO UNRWA! ALSO SECURE THE BORDER FROM BROWN INVADERS!) S.3708 (text): Introduced 1/31/24 by Kennedy (R-LA) and 8 Republican cosponsors, “A bill to reprogram Federal funds appropriated for UNRWA to construct the southwest border wall and to prohibit future funding for UNRWA.” Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. Also see: Kennedy press release – Kennedy authors bill to defund pro-Hamas UN group and divert funds to build border wall
  • (DEATH TO UNRWA! NO MORE PALESTINE REFUGEES!) HR 7111 (text): Introduced 1/29/24 by Mast (R-FL),  “The UNRWA Elimination Act,” aka, “To establish the policy of the United States that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East should be disbanded completely, and for other purposes,” aka (or at least is should be) the “End the Palestine Refugee Issue Once and For All by Killing UNRWA and Declaring that Palestine Refugees Aren’t Refugees Anymore – yeah, that should do it – and the replacing UNRWA with humanitarian aid provided through only Israel-approved/controlled mechanisms, designed to make sure that humanitarian aid is used as a tool to control Palestinians (who are still refugees notwithstanding Israel insisting nobody call them that), and that education is geared to teaching Palestinians to LOVE Israel and blame themselves for everything that has happened to them from 1948 to the present.” NOTE: This bill would not only ban U.S. assistance to UNRWA, but would also make foreign aid to any country conditional on that country supporting the policy that: UNRWA “should be disbanded completely” and “all refugee services and responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza strip should be transferred to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Congressman pushes ban on tax dollars to Hamas-tied UN agency (Washington Examiner 1/29/24)
  • (DEATH TO UNRWA! NO MORE PALESTINE REFUGEES!) HR 7122 (text): Introduced 1/29/24 by Smith (R-NJ) and 3 Republican cosponsors, the “Stop Support for UNRWA Act of 2024“, aka, “To prohibit aid that will benefit Hamas, and for other purposes.” This bill states: “The United States may not make any voluntary or involuntary contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (referred to in this Act as ‘‘UNRWA’’), to any successor or related entity, or to the regular budget of the United Nations for the support of UNRWA or a successor entity.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Republican lawmaker introduces bill to block all funds for UN Palestinian aid agency (The Hill 1/30/24); Smith press release 1/30/24: Smith bill prohibits US funding for UNRWA; Smith co-chairs third congressional hearing exposing the blatant antisemitism of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)

Other anti-UNRWA bills previously introduced in this Congress (and thus still in play):

  • HR 552: the “No Tax Dollars for the United Nation’s Immigration Invasion Act,” aka “To prohibit United States contributions to the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), and for other purposes.”
  • HR 1102/S. 431, the “UNRWA Accountability and Transparency Act” – a bill that: attacks UNRWA (the organization); attacks Palestinian refugees (legislating them out of existence); delegitimizes Palestinian history/narrative/rights (by targeting the mere idea of the right of return); attacks non-violent protest of Israel via boycotts of either Israel or settlements (citing an Obama-era trade law to conflate the two); and legislates/weaponizes a definition of “antisemitism” that explicitly conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism (the IHRA definition of antisemitism.
  • S. 3493: “A bill to require certification prior to obligation of funds for United Nations Relief and Works Agency, and for other purposes.

(b) Letters

(c) Hearing

January 30, 2023: The House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability and Subcommittee on Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations convened a joint witch-hunt/show trial/publicity stunt masquerading as a hearing entitled, “UNRWA Exposed: Examining the Agency’s Mission and Failures.” Witnesses for the prosecution were: Richard Goldberg, Foundation for Defense of Democracies (statement); Marcus Sheff, IMPACT-se (statement); and Hillel Neuer, UN Watch (statement). The sole witness for the defense: Mara Rudman, University of Virginia, Miller Center (statement). And yes, it was as bad as anticipated (though Rudman did try to inject facts/reality into the proceedings, even if most members appeared at best uninterested and more often contemptuous of facts/reality that did not comport with their judgment, made in advance of the show trial, that UNRWA is GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES, and anyone defending UNRWA is, obviously, antisemitic and pro-Hamas).  Also see: video

Selected media coverage of hearing:

Reminder of past hearing:

November 8, 2023: The House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations held a hearing entitled, “United Nations’ Bigotry Towards Israel: UNRWA Anti-semitism Poisons Palestinian Youth” [a title that advertised in advance that the hearing was going to be nothing but a hit-job on UNRWA]. Originally this hearing was to have included a panel featuring a single witness, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan (who prior to the hearing was on the record with the position that UNRWA – by its very existence- “perpetuates” the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and has attacked the Biden Administration for funding UNRWA, arguing among other things that “We believe that this U.N. agency for so-called ‘refugees’ should not exist in its current format“). That panel was apparently scrapped. Witnesses at the hearing were: anti-UNRWA campaigner Hillel Neuer of UN Watch (testimony); longtime UNRWA antagonist Jonathan Schanzer, FDD (testimony);  and Jonathan Lincoln, Interim Director of the Center for Jewish Civilization (testimony). Also see: hearing video

(d) Other selected statements & press coverage

 

4. Hearings & Markups

February 6, 2024: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a markup of various measures including: HR 6603, the “No Technology for Terror Act,” aka, “To apply foreign-direct product rules to Iran.

January 30, 2024: The House Committee on Transportation and Reform held a hearing entitled, “Menace on the Red Sea: Securing Shipping Against Threats in the Red Sea.” Witnesses were: Bud Darr, Executive Vice President of Maritime Policy and Government Affairs, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) (Testimony);  Ian Ralby, Chief Executive Officer, I.R. Consilium (Testimony); Jonathan Gold, Vice President of Supply Chain and Customs Policy, National Retail Federation (Testimony); and David Heindel, President, Seafarers International Union (Testimony). Also see: hearing video;

 

5. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics/Elex

Attacking Free Speech Critical of Israel (& delegitimizing progressive grassroots)

Israel War on Gaza & Biden Policy

Israel Aid

Iran

Other

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
6
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

 

1. Bills, Resolutions & letters

(ADOPTING IHRA DEFINITION INTO US LAW AS PART OF EDUCATION AUTHORIZATION BILL) S. 3392: On 1/22/24, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (chaired by Sanders, I-VT) reported out of committee with an amendment in the nature of a substitute S. 3392, “To reauthorize the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, the Educational Technical Assistance Act of 2002, and the National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act, and for other purposes.” That amendment includes text of an amendment offered by Sen. Marshall (R-KS) during the HELP committee’s markup of the bill on December 12.  Marshall’s amendment adds into S. 3392 the IHRA definition of antisemitism, including its examples (which conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism), in a new section barring funding to any “entity that promotes antisemitism on the campus of such entity, or served by such entity, in violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.).” The new bill text stipulates that for the purposes of this funding ban, “The term ‘antisemitism’ has the meaning given the working definition of antisemitism adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 2016, including the contemporary examples of antisemitism cited by the Alliance” and “The term ‘entity’ means a public elementary school or secondary school (including a charter school), local educational agency, State educational agency, postsecondary program, or institution of higher education.” As of this writing it is now known if/when this measure will be brought to the floor for a vote, or if/how the IHRA language will be dealt with in advance of or during such a vote (it would be unusual for Senate leadership to move ahead with a bill voted out of committee when the chair of that committee opposes the bill). Notably, this is an authorization bill – meaning it is not “must-pass” legislation. In the context of the current mess in Congress, this could mean that the bill will never be brought to a vote at all.

Of note:

  • HELP Chair Sanders vigorously opposed Marshall’s amendment in committee.
  • Some of the debate in the committee centered the amendment barring funds to any entity that “allows Anti-semitism to occur,” and Marshall agreed that changing “allows” to “promotes” might be acceptable.
  • Marshall’s amendment – including the word “allows” passed with YES votes from all Republicans (except for Paul, R-KY, who didn’t vote), plus YES votes from four Democrats: Baldwin (D-WI), Casey (D-PA), Hassan (D-NH), & Hickenlooper (D-CO)
  • The committee subsequently voted at the very end of the markup (by voice vote, after some members had already left) to adopt an amendment to Marshall’s amendment, changing the word “allows” to “promotes” (original amendment; modified amendment).
  • Video of the 12/12/23 markup is here. Committee consideration of the Marshall’s amendment adding enforcement of the IHRA definition of antisemitism to federal funding rules for all U.S. educational entities starts at around 45:40. The Committee vote on modifying Marshall’s amendment starts at around 2:09:45 (in a somewhat chaotic ending to the hearing).

(SUPPORTING 2-STATE SOLUTION) S. Amdt. XXXX: On 1/24/24, Sen. Schatz (D-HI) announced his plan to introduce an amendment “that reiterates longstanding U.S. policy in support of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict” to the anticipated supplemental aid bill. According to his press release, his amendment is supported by all fellow Senate Democrats except for Fetterman (D-PA) and Manchin (D-WV). Many of those Democrats gave quotes cited in the press release. The amendment reads: “It is the policy of the United States— (1) to support a negotiated comprehensive solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states with Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace, security, dignity, and mutual recognition; and (2) that such a solution must ensure the state of Israel’s survival as a secure, democratic, and Jewish state, and fulfill the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a state of their own.” Also see: 49 Senate Democrats join amendment affirming support for two-state solution – The legislation represents an effective rebuke of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent comments rejecting a two-state solution (Jewish Insider 1/15/24); John Fetterman and Joe Manchin decline to back resolution supporting a 2-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Business Insider 1/24/24); Congressional Dems intensify their pushback against Netanyahu with public defense of Palestinian state (Politico 1/24/24)

(DISAPPROVE OF AID TO EGYPT) S. J. Res. 54: Introduced 1/22/24 by Paul (R-KY), “A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles and services.” Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

(DISAPPROVE OF AID TO EGYPT) S. J. Res. 55: Introduced 1/22/24 by Paul (R-KY), A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles and services. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

(DISAPPROVE OF AID TO EGYPT) S. J. Res. 56:  Introduced 1/22/24 by Paul (R-KY), A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sales to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles and services. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

(IRAN) S. 3647: Introduced 1/24/24 by Warnock (D-GA) and Vance (R-OH), “A bill to amend the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act to use funds in the lump sum catch-up payment reserve fund to make payments to Iran hostages and their families.” Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 

2. Letters

  • [WE SUPPORT THE 2-STATE SOLUTION] 1/23/24: Congressmen Krishnamoorthi and 43 Democratic colleagues send letter to Biden in support of two-state solution [letter text]. Excerpt: “We write today to express our support for a two-state solution as the only viable path for a sustainable peace between the Israeli and Palestinian people. We applaud your continued commitment to a goal that could end the decades-long cycle of violence that has consumed the Israeli and Palestinian people. We are deeply concerned by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s public rejection of a two-state solution on January 18, and respectfully request that your Administration outline a strategy to marshal international and ultimately, Israeli and Palestinian support to successfully implement a two-state solution.

 

3. Hearings & Markups

January 30, 2023: The House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability and Subcommittee on Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations will convene a joint witch-hunt/show trial/publicity stunt masquerading as a hearing entitled, “UNRWA Exposed: Examining the Agency’s Mission and Failures.” Witnesses will be: Richard Goldberg, Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Marcus Sheff, IMPACT-se; Hillel Neuer, UN Watch; Mara Rudman, University of Virginia Miller Center. Note that there has been a lot of targeting of UNRWA of late – see for example:

  • Risch on Reports of UNRWA Staff’s Alleged Complicity in Kidnapping of Israelis on October 7;
  • Jewish Insider – U.S. halts UNRWA funding over staffers’ involvement with Oct. 7 terror attacks;
  • Israel Hayom – Israel asks UNRWA to vacate plot, pay fine in capital over illegal activity;
  • Stefanik (R-NY) 1/26/24 – “It is absolutely shameful and unacceptable that employees at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) had a direct role in the barbaric October 7th attacks against Israel. UNRWA is supposed to be a humanitarian agency, yet their employees are supporting Hamas in its goal to eradicate the Israeli state and carry out genocide against the Jewish people. Unfortunately, this is another devastating consequence of the Biden Administration’s complete incompetence. In 2021, Joe Biden reversed President Trump’s decision to cut off U.S. taxpayer dollars from going to the antisemitic UNRWA. For the last three years Joe Biden’s decision to send U.S. taxpayer dollars to Gaza with no oversight and no accountability has allowed for the proliferation of abhorrent and antisemitic educational materials to be used across Gaza and filled the coffers of Hamas. Now we are finding out that their employees who are funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars were directly involved in the abhorrent October 7th attacks. The Biden Administration’s limited suspension of funds to UNRWA to cover up for their disastrous mistake is unacceptable. Joe Biden must permanently cut off all funding to this antisemitic and violent organization.”

January 30, 2024: The House Committee on Transportation and Reform will hold a hearing entitled, “Menace on the Red Sea: Securing Shipping Against Threats in the Red Sea.” As of this writing there is no information regarding witnesses.

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Elections/politics
Congress & Aid for Israel
Congress & Support for Israel

Other

1. Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

 

1. Bills, Resolutions & letters

(STATE DEPT MUST ANSWER IF ISRAEL IS VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS) S. Res. 504: Introduced 12/14/23, “A resolution requesting information on Israel’s human rights practices pursuant to section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.” On 1/16/24, Sanders (I-VT) came to the Senate floor with a motion to discharge S. Res. 504 from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and to bring the resolution to the Senate floor for debate and a vote. That motion failed, with the Senate voting to table it (i.e., to prevent any further action on the resolution) by a vote of 72-11. Floor consideration is here.

(CONDEMNING RAPE/SEXUAL VIOLENCE BY HAMAS) H. Res. 966: Introduced 1/16/24 by Frankel (D-FL) and 152 cosponsors (bipartisan), “Condemning rape and sexual violence committed by Hamas in its war against Israel.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Reps. Frankel, Díaz-Balart, Manning, Kiggans Introduce Bipartisan Resolution to Condemn Rape and Sexual Violence Committed by Hamas; Nearly 150 lawmakers to introduce bipartisan resolution condemning Hamas sexual violence (Jewish Insider 1/16/24)

(DEPORT PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT PALESTINIAN RIGHTS) S. 3587 (bill text): Introduced 1/11/24 by Rubio (R-FL) Vance (R-0OH) and Lee (R-UT), the ” the Mandatory Removal Proceedings Act,” aka, “A bill to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to immediately initiate removal proceedings for aliens whose visas are revoked on security or related grounds.” Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. NOTE: Rubio’s press release makes clear the target of this bill: “Flashback … Following the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, Senator Rubio pushed to include a provision in the national defense bill to revoke visas and initiate deportation proceedings for any foreign national who has endorsed or espoused the terrorist activities of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, or any other foreign terrorist organization.”

(USING CLAIMS OF ANTISEMITISM TO QUASH PALESTINE VOICES/SOLIDARITY ON US CAMPUSES) S. 3580: Introduced 1/11/24 (not covered previously in the Round-Up) by Cassidy (R-LA) and Fetterman (D-CA), the “Protecting Students on Campus Act of 2024.” Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Also see: Bipartisan bill aims to fight antisemitism on campus by fortifying civil rights complaint system (CNN 1/11/24 — “A bipartisan Senate bill introduced Thursday could make it easier for students to file civil rights complaints over antisemitism and Islamophobia on college campuses and to hold those schools accountable for protecting students.”)

(TARGETING PALESTINIANS IN CONTINUING RESOLUTION) S. Amdt 1384 to HR 2872: On 1/18/24 the Senate passed its version of HR 2872, “Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes,” paving the way  for House passage and averting a government shutdown. As part of Senate consideration of the bill, it voted on S. Amdt. 1384, introduced by Paul (R-KY), to prohibit assistance “to Palestinian Authority and Other Governing Entities in the West Bank and Gaza” [note: aid to the Palestinians is already the most conditioned, restricted, limited, monitored, report on aid that the U.S. gives anywhere in the world]. Under this new legislation – which is very likely to show up again – all such aid would be permanently barred unless the President certifies (annually) that “(A) the Palestinian Authority, or other Palestinian governing entity in the West Bank and Gaza, has– (i) formally recognized the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state; (ii) publicly recognized the state of Israel; (iii) renounced terrorism; (iv) purged all individuals with terrorist ties from security services; (v) terminated funding of anti-American and anti-Israel incitement; (vi) publicly renounced Hamas and the October 7, 2023, attacks perpetrated by Hamas on Israel; and (vii) honored previous diplomatic agreements; and (B) all hostages abducted on October 7, 2023, and held in territory governed by the Palestinian Authority or other Palestinian governing authority have been released.” The legislation also requires an extensive report on the “Human Rights Practices by the Palestinian Authority or Any Other Palestinian Governing Entity in the West Bank and Gaza” including “a list of international organizations that– (i) accept financial contributions from the United States Government; and (ii) provide assistance of any kind to the Palestinian Authority or any other Palestinian governing entity in the West Bank and Gaza.” Paul’s amendment failed by a party-line vote of 44-50 (with Manchin, D-WV, the sole Democrat voting in favor and 6 Republicans not voting). Also see: Paul floor statement on his amendment; Cardin (D-MD) floor statement opposing it.

(TARGETING ACADEMIA) HR 7033: Introduced 1/18/24 by Calvert (R-CA), “To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply a 6 percent excise tax on large endowments of certain private colleges and universities, and for other purposes.” Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. NOTE: As of this writing there’s no bill text in the Congressional Record and Calvert hasn’t issued a press release, but this sure looks like a continuation of the campaign in Congress against universities — a campaign that is of course linked to and fueled by the weaponization of claims of antisemitism, with antisemitism in this context defined to mean criticism of Israel/Zionism and/or activism for Palestinian rights.

 

2. Letters

1/17/24: Committee Republicans Demand Answers After Reports of UNRWA Aid Ending Up in Hamas’ Hands [letter text]. Also see – House Republicans ask UNRWA chief for answers about aid theft (Jewish News Syndicate); House committee calls UNRWA chief to testify on alleged Hamas aid theft (Jewish Insider 1/19/24)

1/17/24: Rubio, Colleagues Urge Investigation Into Pro-Hamas, Anti-Veteran Vandals [letter text]

 

3. Hearings & Markups

January 18, 2024: The House Judiciary Committee held a markup of various measures including HR 6679, the “No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act.”  The Committee adopted by a vote of 24-0 an Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to HR 6679 and voted to report the measure out of committee (meaning it can now be brought to the House floor for a vote if leadership wishes). Also see: markup video

January 18, 2024: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a closed (TS/SCI) meeting to receive a briefing from Secretary of State Blinken.

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Source NM 1/19/24: Stansbury joins Vasquez as second N.M. congress member to call for ceasefire in Gaza
NBC News 1/18/24: Netanyahu’s opposition to Palestinian state could complicate Senate aid package [“‘That statement is not helpful,’ said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., who is negotiating an immigration and foreign aid package with Republicans.“]
Jewish Insider 1/18/24: Congress marks grim milestone for Gaza hostages
ABC News 1/18/24: How Silicon Valley congressional candidates think antisemitism, Israel-Hamas War should be addressed
Defense News 1/18/24: Pressure mounts on Biden to leverage human rights laws on Israel aid
WSFA 1/18/24: Congress marks 100 days since Israel attacked by Hamas with candlelight vigil
Texas Tribune 1/18/24: Houston congressional candidate accused by former staff of sexual misconduct and using Israel conflict as political cover
Inkstick Media 1/18/24: How Congress Fails to Hold Israel Accountable on Human Rights
Washington Free Beacon 1/18/24: House Dem Shares Stage With Anti-Semites and Holocaust Deniers at ‘March for Gaza’ Rally
Jewish Insider 1/18/24: White House, Democrats grow impatient with Netanyahu’s latest rebuff of Palestinian state
Jewish News Syndicate 1/18/24: Dem, GOP senators trade mudslinging on nominee tied to Hamas ‘mouthpiece’
Huffington Post 1/18/24: Democratic Lawmakers Plan Push To Get Controversial Biden Adviser Out Of Office
Roll Call 1/17/24:Families of Hamas hostages appeal to senators for more US pressure on Israel to secure release The Intercept 1/17/24: Hakeem Jeffries Bucks AIPAC, Endorses Squad Member Summer Lee — The House Democratic leadership, normally staunch allies of AIPAC, bucked the Israel lobby in favor of incumbent progressive Summer Lee.
CNBC 1/17/24: Biden meets with Speaker Johnson, Sen. Schumer on Ukraine, Israel aid as shutdown looms
Al Jazeera 1/17/24: Christian protesters singing for Gaza ceasefire in US Congress arrested
Responsible Statecraft 1/16/24: The “War Reserve Stockpile Allies – Israel” Explained & Why Congress Should Not Expand It
Jewish Telegraphic Agency 1/16/24: Ritchie Torres: Anti-Israel protesters celebrating Oct. 7 are like white people who cheered lynchings
Responsible Statecraft 1/16/24: Congress forms caucus to aid Iranian ex-terror group [“Members are promising to advocate for the Mojahedin-e Khalq, a guerrilla organization facing new scrutiny from its Albanian hosts”]
The New Yorker 1/12/24: How Israel’s Inspection Process Is Obstructing Aid Delivery – Senator Chris Van Hollen describes what he witnessed on the Egypt-Gaza border.
Axios 1/12/24: Scoop: Jewish Democrats grill Israeli ambassador on far-right ministers

1.Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New:

 

1. Bills, Resolutions & letters

(TARGETING ACADEMIA FOR PRO-PALESTINE STUDENTS/PROTEST) S. 3580: Introduced 1/11/23 by Cassidy (R-LA) and Fetterman (D-PA), “A bill to require institutions of higher education participating in Federal student aid programs to share information about title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including a link to the webpage of the Office for Civil Rights where an individual can submit a complaint regarding discrimination in violation of such title, and for other purposes.” Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

(MAKING US NON-VIOLENT PROTEST A FEDERAL CRIME) S. 3492/HR 6926: Introduced 12/13/23 [not previously reported in the Round-Up] in the Senate by Tillis (R-NC) and Blackburn (R-TN), and 1/9/24 in the House by Rouzer (R-NC) and Republican cosponsors, the “Safe and Open Streets Act.” Referred to the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary. Why is this bill being covered in the Round-Up? See Tillis press release announcing the bill (published 1/8/24) – “The Safe and Open Streets Act is in direct response to radical tactics of pro-Palestine protestors who have intentionally blocked roads and highways across the country.” COMMENT: Coming on the heels of Senate “anti-woke” Republicans successfully exploiting hysteria over pro-Palestinian protests to get Democrats to join them on the “we must bring down “liberal” academia” bandwagon, this bill appears to be an effort to use that same hysteria to get Democrats to join Republicans on the “we must shut down liberals’ right to protest”  bandwagon (and if it doesn’t, to pave the way for Republicans to attack Democrats as anti-Israel/antisemitic).

(NO WEAPONS FOR ISRAEL WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT) S. Amdt. XXX: On 1/9/24 Sen. Kaine (D-VA) announced his intentionto file an amendment to maintain the congressional notification requirement for all U.S. assistance to foreign militaries. Specifically, the amendment would strike a provision in the proposed national security supplemental funding bill that waives oversight requirements for U.S. funding for Israel under the Foreign Military Financing Program. If passed, the amendment would preserve the congressional notification process for Israel, just as congressional notifications are required for all other nations.” Cosponsors of the amendment at the time it was announced were The amendment is sponsored by Heinrich (D-NM), Van Hollen (D-MD),  Merkley (D-OR), Warren (D-MA), Welch (D-VT), Luján (D-NM), Durbin (D-IL),  Schatz (D-HI),  Murphy (D-CT), Warnock (D-GA), Carper (D-DE), and Shaheen (D-NH).  Also see: Jewish Insider 1/10/24: Senate progressives seek to block administration from circumventing Congress on Israel arms transfers; Defense Daily 1/10/24: Kaine Leads Amendment To Ensure Congressional Review Of Arms Sales To Israel; Washington Post 1/9/24: Democrats say Biden must notify Congress about Israel arms transfers

(STATE DEPT MUST ANSWER IF ISRAEL IS VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS) S. Res. 504: On 1/10/24, Sanders (I-VT) announced (video of floor remarks) that he would be bringing a 502B(c) resolution to the Senate floor next week with respect to Israeli rights violations in its ongoing war on Gaza. As a reminder, on 12/14 23 Sanders introduced S. Res. 504, “Requesting information on Israel’s human rights practices pursuant to section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.” This is what is known as a 502B(c) or “Privileged Resolution.” As Sanders’ press release explained: “The Foreign Assistance Act prohibits security assistance to any government ‘which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.’ Section 502B(c) of this law allows Congress to request information on a country’s human rights practices – such requests are privileged, allowing the sponsor to force a floor vote on the requesting resolution. If the resolution passes, the Department of State must submit the requested report within 30 days, or all security assistance to the country in question is cut off. After the report is received, Congress may then enact changes to condition, reduce, or terminate the security assistance in question. Both the initial vote to request the information and any subsequent votes to alter security assistance are privileged and require a simple majority for passage.” [See this X-thread for details on Section 502B(c)]. Also see: What is S.Res. 504? – Sanders Resolution to Hold U.S. and Israel Accountable (NIAC 1/11/24)

 

2. Letters

Shutting Down Palestine-focused Free Speech — Targeting Academia (pretending it is about fighting antisemitism)

Supporting Israel Continuing the War on Gaza

Concerns re Israel’s War on Gaza

  • Reps. Pressley and Raskin’s Letter to Secretary Blinken (Americans for Peace Now press release, w/ letter text) [Excerpt – “Due to the ongoing conflict, over 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza, nearly 80% of the population, have been internally displaced in the Gaza Strip. Worsening sanitary conditions, shortages of food, water, fuel, and medicines, and thousands of cases of acute respiratory infections, diarrhea and chicken pox reflect an increasingly dire humanitarian crisis. The Israeli government must urgently increase the amount of humanitarian aid entering the Gaza Strip in order to address this humanitarian catastrophe. If Palestinian civilians choose to leave Gaza voluntarily in search of safety, they must be guaranteed to be allowed to return. Many in Gaza fear that any temporary displacement would become permanent. The United States must ensure that there is no question that Palestinian civilians who wish to remain in the Gaza Strip have the right to do so.“]

Targeting the Houthis

Targeting Iran

Other

 

3. Hearings & Markups

None.

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Politics

 

Israel aid

 

Supporting/Defending Israel & EVERYTHING Israel Does in its War on Gaza

 

Concerns about Israel’s War on Gaza

 

US Military Action Against Houthis

 

Targeting Free Speech/Protest/Critics of Israel/Palestinian Rights

 

Other

 

 

 

1.Bills, Resolutions
2. Letters
3. Hearings & Markups
4. Selected Media & Press releases/Statements

New:

1/4/24: Committee on Oversight and Accountability, Democratic Staff report: White House for Sale: How Princes, Prime Ministers, and Premiers Paid Off President Trump Staff Report [incl. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait]

1. Bills, Resolutions & letters

(APPARENTLY TRYING TO KEEP THE ROB MALLEY CASE ALIVE FOR POLITICAL GRANDSTANDING) HR 6911: Introduced 1/2/24 by Tenney (R-NY), “To require heads of Executive agencies to, upon request, submit to relevant congressional committees information regarding the furlough or indefinite suspension without pay of employees of such Executive agencies, and for other purposes.  Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

(DISAPPROVING OF MILITARY AID TO UAE) H. J. Res.105: Introduced 1/2/24 by Omar (D-MN), “Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Omar Leads Push to Block Over $650 Million in Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE (Common Dreams 1/3/24)

(DISAPPROVING OF MILITARY AID TO KSA) H. J. Res.106: Introduced 1/2/24 by Omar (D-MN),Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain defense articles and services.” Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Also see: Omar Leads Push to Block Over $650 Million in Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE (Common Dreams 1/3/24)

 

2. Letters

1/4/24: Blackburn, Sullivan, Colleagues Renew Call For Biden To Re-Designate Iranian-Backed Houthis A Terrorist Org [letter text]

12/22/23: Facebook post by Rep. Barr (R-KY) – “I led a bipartisan letter with Rep Josh Gottheimer urging Secretary Yellen to investigate Malaysia’s recent boycott against Israeli ships. In the wake of the October 7 attack on Israel, it’s crucial to stand with our ally against economic attacks.”  [letter text]. Also see Barr’s X-post – “I led a bipartisan letter with @RepJoshG urging Secretary Yellen to investigate Malaysia’s recent boycott against Israeli ships. In the wake of the October 7 attack on Israel, it’s crucial to stand with our ally against economic attacks.”

 

3. Hearings & Markups

None.

 

4. Selected Media & Press releases/statements

Aid & Weapons for Israel

Congress & Israel’s War on Gaza

Targeting Free Speech/Protest for Palestinian Rights

Politics

Iran

Other