The week of July 13, 2026 saw an unprecedented vote in the House of Representatives regarding aid to Israel. The vote was on an amendment offered by Massie (R-KY) to the HR 8595 – the FY27 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs (NSRP) Appropriations Act. The amendment states: “No funds for Israel. (a) None of the funds made available under this Act shall be obligated or expended for Israel. (b) The amount otherwise made available by this Act for ‘Foreign Military Financing Program’ is hereby reduced by $3,300,000,000.”

The decision by House Republican leaders to make this amendment [which Massie has been introducing on this bill every year] “in order” — i.e., to let it come to the floor for a vote — comes in the context of rising grassroots opposition to aid for Israel and criticism of the US-Israel relationship — grounded in nearly 3 years of live-streamed destruction and genocide in Gaza, escalating Israeli terrorism in the West Bank, Israel’s mass destruction and ethnic cleansing in Lebanon, and the widely-held view that Israel pushed/manipulated the Trump Administration into war with Iran. The decision appeared to reflect a goal of forcing a politically awkward/costly vote on Democrats that would divide the caucus — on an amendment that has no chance of passing (thanks to Republican votes), amending a bill that most Democrats would vote NO on anyway. The actual outcome, however, was something quite different.

The actual outcome, however, was something quite different.

On 7/15/26, the House REJECTED the Massie Amendment by a vote of 104-314 — with 103 Democrats voting NO and another 10 voting PRESENT.

• Nearly 50% of Democrats voting in favor of the amendment (103 our of a total of 212 Democrats currently in the House).
• 10 Democrats voted “present.” This means that, between the “yes” and “present” votes, more than 50% of Democrats opted to NOT oppose an amendment to cut off aid to Israel, despite opposition from House Leader Jeffries (D-NY) [whose opposition included permission for members to vote their consciences] and lobbying by AIPAC and other legacy pro-Israel groups.
• Almost every member who voted “yes” or “present”, and many of those voting “no,” issued statements laying out powerful criticisms of Netanyahu and/or Israeli policies, along with concrete/explicit expressions of readiness to support different legislative measures targeting US aid for and policy with respect to Israel — such that the bottom line impact of this vote is to fundamentally reset Democratic party policy on Israel, including with respect both to current/future aid, the next MOU, and the question of pressure/sanctions.
• Among those voting “yes” or “present” are a number of members who are a significant number who are actively supported by AIPAC
• Among those voting “no” are a number are being or have already been primaried by candidates from the left (in races where support for Israel may be a key difference between the candidates).

Below is a collection of floor statements/press releases/social media posts from members on the amendment — offering a useful snapshot into the framing/language/policies articulated in relation to this amendment, much of which represents unprecedented public expressions of criticism of Israel and unprecedented expressions of readiness and intent to change the US-Israel relationship — and virtually all of which underscore that for Democrats in Congress, the era of knee-jerk support for unconditional, unquestioned/unexamined, ceaselessly expanding U.S. aid for Israel is well and truly OVER, as is the era of knee-jerk accusations that anyone who dares to question or oppose aid to Israel is “antisemitic.”

Quotes are in alphabetical order, for ease of reading/searching.

---

Members of Congress voting NO on the Massie Amendment to bar all US aid to Israel:

• Adams (D-NC) 7/15/26: “I share the deep frustration so many Americans feel about how conflicts in Gaza and Iran have unfolded, and I have not been silent about the need for accountability and lasting peace. That is why I have co-sponsored the Block the Bombs Act to end the shipment of destructive weapons to Israel. However, a vague amendment that jeopardizes humanitarian and diplomatic efforts in the region is the wrong vehicle. The Massie Amendment was broadly written; it included non-military funding cuts that would limit humanitarian aid, cut refugee resettlement support programs, reduce U.S. Embassy operations, and inhibit peacebuilding efforts in the Middle East. I could not support a measure this broad, even to make an important point. My opposition to this amendment is a rejection of a blunt instrument that would have caused collateral damage to programs that save lives.”
• Aguilar (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I believe this amendment is the wrong approach to U.S. policy in the Middle East. By undermining the Obama-led Memorandum of Understanding, this amendment would compromise our national security, hurt our efforts to achieve peace in the region, and sabotage our ultimate goal of a two-state solution. This amendment could have far-reaching and unintended consequences, including threatening the U.S. embassy in Israel, undermining peace-building efforts and cutting off humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. In the future, we will have the opportunity to review the nature and scope of our direct security and diplomatic assistance to Israel, but we should not do it as part of a rushed response to a poorly-drafted amendment to one appropriations bill. I believe it’s wrong to abandon our allies and walk away from our agreements during such a fragile moment. That is why I opposed this amendment and similarly opposed the Massie amendment to eliminate aid to Jordan. I also voted against the underlying bill because it weakens our national security and undermines our goal of building a lasting peace in the Middle East.”
• Bell (D-MO) 7/15/26: X-post – “Today I voted against a slew of reckless amendments offered by Republicans following a ‘Trump doctrine’ that does nothing but destabilize the Middle East, weaken our allies and global institutions like the UN, and withhold humanitarian aid from those who need it most. At a time when our allies, including Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, Jordan, and others, are on the frontlines against our sworn enemies, we cannot afford to turn a blind eye and withhold support and assistance. No ally is perfect, and just like the U.S. government, I do not agree with all of the actions of our allies abroad. But instead of trying to find a comprehensive solution to the issues Republicans want to address in this bill, these amendments are blunt, broad, and carelessly drafted,. This is a political stunt designed to drive a wedge through the House Democratic Caucus rather than have the serious and honest debate these issues deserve. For nearly 80 years, the United States has played a vital role in promoting peace in the post-World War II international order. While the Trump Administration and Republicans are perfectly fine with turning our back on our allies, I am not. I will continue to support our allies, ensure humanitarian assistance is provided, and ensure our policies do not put our civilians and servicemembers in harm’s way.“
• Bishop (D-GA) 7/16/26: “Today, I opposed the Fiscal Year 2027 funding bill that funds our State Department and provides the resources to implement American foreign policy. This bill will lead to the continued erosion of American diplomacy, a foreign policy that ignores our highest ideals, and compromises our national security.  I also could not support the Massie Amendment. While it drew attention to how our support, including military aid, can be misused and abused, its broad language effectively cut off our nose to spite our face. I remain committed to supporting the rights, security, freedom, and self-determination of both Israelis and Palestinians. I remain opposed to expanding settlements and occupation. But this amendment does not limit its effects to just Israelis and Palestinians. It jeopardizes the investment we need in regional missile defense and our ability to counter other regional state and non-state groups that threaten the United States. This amendment did not enjoy bipartisan support and no Republicans, other than Congressman Massie, supported the measure. If we are going to help Israelis and Palestinians achieve a just and sustainable resolution, we need to work together to find a bipartisan solution.”
• Cleaver (D-MO) 7/16/26: “This Republican foreign aid bill debated yesterday decimates needed humanitarian aid and undercuts American diplomacy around the world. Republicans included an amendment to the bill by Rep. Massie that could block all foreign aid to Israel, including programs I strongly support that are focused on peacebuilding and humanitarian aid. I voted no on Rep. Massie’s amendment because I ardently believe in peacebuilding programs which are working daily to bring people together, rather than divide them. Despite its title and messaging, the amendment was drafted in such a broad way that it leaves the Trump Administration, who will implement it, with wide discretion to decide which funding accounts should be blocked. This creates the false impression that Congress had ended their support. That’s not honest policymaking, and it’s not how we should approach an issue with such profound humanitarian consequences. Israel has the right to exist and the right to defend their people, and I believe the U.S. should continue to have a strong strategic alliance with Israel. However, the status quo is not tenable; not for the Israeli people long term, not for the Palestinians trying to live in an ever-shrinking territory in the West Bank, and certainly not for the people still suffering in Gaza. It is outrageous that this Republican bill provided no aid for the Palestinian people continuing to suffer in Gaza. If Congress is serious about examining and changing U.S. policy, then we should debate and vote on legislation that actually does what it claims to do.”
• Craig (D-MN) 7/15/26: “Today’s vote was an unserious attempt by Rep. Thomas Massie to implement sweeping and irresponsible changes to America’s foreign policy. Let me be clear. Benjamin Netanyahu’s reckless policies and the humanitarian crisis he has created in Gaza have damaged Israel’s reputation on the world stage and therefore jeopardized any progress toward weakening Hamas and implementing a necessary two-state solution. Not to mention, President Trump and Netanyahu’s dangerous and illegal war with Iran has driven up costs and put American troops in harm’s way. I firmly believe that the best thing for the U.S.-Israel relationship is for Netanyahu to lose his next election. That said, the U.S.’ longstanding partnership with Israel is critical for maintaining peace and stability in the Middle East and a blanket ban on all foreign aid, including humanitarian programs, would not only endanger the Israeli people, but also American troops and our allies in the region. Attempting to litigate these complex foreign policy conversations through an amendment to the national security appropriations bill undermines the importance of our alliance with Israel and threatens to undercut ongoing efforts to restore peace in the Middle East.”
• DeLauro (D-CT) 7/15/26: “I have been a leader in Congress calling for a major surge in humanitarian aid to Gaza, and in advocating for a two-state solution that provides long term security for the Israeli and the Palestinian people. This amendment would put both of those goals in jeopardy. Its vague wording gives the Trump Administration broad leeway to determine which programs are defunded and how. Based on the Trump Administration’s failure to meaningfully progress the 20-point peace plan and their track record of defunding international aid programs and diplomatic engagement, I have no doubt that the first programs they choose to cut will be longstanding initiatives that support peace-building activities, facilitate exchanges for students and scholars, assist with refugee resettlement, and provide for scientific and technical cooperation between Israeli and Palestinian organizations. The amendment is so broad that it could even potentially restrict essential U.S. embassy operations, threatening the safety of American citizens in the region. I share the concerns of many Americans about U.S. support to Israel’s military operations, and successfully introduced an amendment to the 2027 Defense Appropriations Bill requiring reporting on the use of American weapons by Israel that could be in violation of the ceasefire. My amendment was designed to create transparency—this one does the opposite. The amount of discretion this amendment would provide to the Trump Administration in all aspects of this important relationship is unwise. With the expiration of the current 10-year Memorandum of Understanding signed by President Obama and the state of Israel, it is time for a major realignment. Israel is a developed nation that is capable of procuring advanced weapons without US support. Therefore, we must ensure that any future security relationship with Israel is structured similarly to defense agreements with our Western and democratic allies. Maintaining Israel’s security in the region with countries like Iran still requires that we support Israel’s security with defensive systems like Iron Dome, Arrow, and David’s Sling. A new defense agreement must be based on respect for human rights and allow for a route to Palestinian sovereignty.  To that end, the United States must use our influence to both increase humanitarian aid and restrain Israeli violations of the existing ceasefire. This amendment does neither, and would remove every last source of leverage Congress has to influence Israel’s government. For these reasons, I voted no.”
• DelBene (D-WA) 7/15/26: “The American relationship with Israel must change for the good of both the Israeli and Palestinian people. We must find a path towards peace, and that requires thoughtful discussions and vetted policy. This poorly drafted and overly broad amendment does not just cut military aid to Israel. It also eliminates vital humanitarian assistance, halts funding that supports refugee resettlement, prevents the rebuilding of Gaza, disrupts U.S. diplomatic efforts, and weakens our ability to fight terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. We should not let Republicans dictate America’s position on the Middle East. The way forward must be anchored in a two-state solution that provides a commitment for Israel’s security alongside a viable, independent Palestinian state. This must include a surge of humanitarian aid to alleviate civilian suffering, aid to rebuild Gaza, and an end to the illegal settler expansion in the West Bank. The Netanyahu government is actively blocking this path. By pursuing a military-only strategy, Netanyahu has isolated Israel internationally, damaged its standing in the United States, and killed and displaced civilians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon. Americans should not be subsidizing this reckless and dangerous behavior. As the Israeli Prime Minister says, Israel can finance its own military. While Israel has a right to exist and defend itself from Iran and terrorists, that right does not excuse the horrifying destruction of innocent life or actions that destabilize the entire region. The path forward will not be an easy one, but we cannot accept the status quo. Today’s amendment would move us in the wrong direction by cutting humanitarian assistance and diplomatic aid. I voted against it and the underlying funding bill. I will keep working toward real solutions that bring us closer to a lasting and just peace in the Middle East.”
• Diaz-Balart (R-FL): floor statement – “Madam Chairwoman, as chairman of this subcommittee since 2023, I am proud to be a leader in this body in providing unwavering support to our friend and ally, Israel, especially– especially–after the October 7 terrorist attack. The $3.3 billion in foreign military financing for Israel included in this bill supports American–our–national security interests overseas. We see the same terrorists and terrorist entities that threaten Israel also threaten the United States and our people directly. When we give Israel the tools and capabilities to eliminate these terrorist threats and to protect their homeland, while including the many Americans who visit and live there, we are making America and the American people safer. The United States and Israel have worked together on successful military operations like those in the past year to decimate Iran’s nuclear program and missile capabilities. Israel is also using the overwhelming majority of this funding to actually purchase American- made weaponry, so it actually helps our defense industrial base and our economy. We have worked together extensively on developing military capabilities and other capabilities. Because of these advancements for our mutual interest and security, there is currently a discussion of moving to a new security partnership with Israel after fiscal year 2028. Just to be clear, the assistance in this bill for fiscal year 2027 is under the terms of the existing MOU, memorandum of understanding, which runs for 2 more fiscal years. This does not, in any way, prejudge the outcome of ongoing negotiations. This is about fulfilling our commitment to one of our closest and most important allies that we have in the entire world at a time when terrorists are butchering people around the world. We made that commitment because it makes the American people–our country–stronger. Madam Chair, I urge defeat of the amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.”
• Diaz-Balart (R-FL): floor statement – “Madam Chair, as I have said before with this bill, and I have said it many times: If you are an ally and a friend of the United States, this bill supports you. If you are an adversary, you are not going to like this bill. We have no stronger ally than the State of Israel. This is our commitment under the MOU, which is why I respectfully, but very strongly–very strongly–oppose this amendment…”
• Frankel (D-FL): floor statement – “Madam Chair, I rise in very strong opposition to this amendment. Maintaining stability in the Middle East has long been a vital United States strategic interest. What happens there affects our economy, national security, and the safety of our American servicemembers. As written, this amendment is overbroad in that it prohibits or could limit the use of funds for longstanding initiatives related to peace building, refugee settlement, and U.S. Embassy operations. This amendment would restrict our country’s ability to confront Iran’s proxies: Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of the United States, Israel, and our allies. Madam Chair, a 10-minute debate is not the way to change policy as we have a mission of peace in the region and prosperity, both for Israelis and Palestinians.“
• Frankel (D-FL): floor statement – “…there is no question that going forward there needs to be a thoughtful conversation how we spend our foreign aid money. I know we are all committed to that. My heart breaks for the suffering of innocent people in Gaza. We must find a way to infuse humanitarian support, how to find a peaceful coexistence between Israelis and Palestinians, but let me tell you how we got here. Since 1979, Iran has repeatedly called for Israel’s elimination while arming terrorist proxies. In the past 3 years, those proxies have launched more than 30,000 rockets, missiles, drones, and mortars into Israel while Hamas hid in their billion dollars’ worth of building of tunnels, 450 miles of tunnels, beneath civilian areas to wage war, not peace. This is not a way to handle foreign policy. I join all rational people who say let’s have a deliberate conversation how to move forward, but not with a 10-minute debate on the floor of the House. Let’s have our efforts aimed together to a two-state solution where Palestinians and Israelis can live peacefully and prosperously together.”
• Gillen (D-NY) 7/15/26: “The State of Israel is one of our most important allies and the only democracy in the Middle East. I firmly support Israel’s right to exist and defend itself from threats, including Iran and terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. This extremely harmful amendment would threaten our strategic alliance, undermine our national security interests and eliminate funding for important research and diplomacy in the region, including the Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace Act, which supports Israeli-Palestinian people-to-people initiatives. That is why I staunchly opposed it. In Congress, I remain committed to ensuring the U.S.-Israel relationship remains a bipartisan issue and promoting peace, stability and a better future in the region.”
• Hayes (D-CT) 7/15/26: “I support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and homeland for the Jewish people, and recognize the close military, economic and strategic alliance we share. During my time in Congress, I’ve had a long-standing voting record in support of defense funding for Israel and remain committed to ensuring its safety and security. I am also horrified by UNICEF reports that children in Gaza have been killed, maimed, and displaced in a devastating war that is an affront to our shared humanity. The security and humanitarian situation in the region remains catastrophic, characterized by widespread destruction, mass displacement, severe aid blockages and high levels of acute food shortages. I continue to believe the Palestinian people have a right to self-determination and American actions should support that goal. It is unfortunate that Massie Amendment #8 is poorly written and extremely broad and fails to acknowledge the humanitarian efforts, potential impacts on Embassy operations, educational and cultural exchanges, and the ongoing support for Palestinian Security Forces which are funded through this aid. I do not believe this amendment was drafted in pursuit of longstanding solutions, but instead to be another political wedge issue. While I do not agree with the entirety of the amendment, I do believe it opens the door to long overdue, hard conversations on U.S. military aid. In the same way I have voted no to domestic funding for agencies who refuse to implement necessary reforms, I cannot vote to send American taxpayer dollars anywhere in the world without that same level of scrutiny. In this moment, my constituents in the Fifth district of Connecticut are demanding more thoughtful and deliberate consideration of the path forward for the Israeli and Palestinian people. For these reasons I voted in support of the amendment.“
• Hoyer (D-MD) 7/15/26:  floor statement – “I rise in strong disagreement with this amendment, which would dangerously undermine America’s national security. If adopted, it would – as Leader Jeffries rightly pointed out – limit our ability to confront terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah that expressly target American citizens and military personnel. And it would make it harder for America to use our relationships with Israel and regional partners to promote a negotiated two-state solution, the only realistic path to deliver on the promise of peace, security, and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians. I understand the frustration many Members feel with some of the policies and actions of the current Israeli government – as well as their concerns about its commitment to the peace process and a two-state solution. However, this amendment would embolden the enemies of peace, those who seek the complete elimination of Israel, and those looking for an excuse to murder Jews. It is a vote to weaken our ability to engage in the region, and it is a vote against American security, against American interests, and against Americans’ safety. Vote ‘no.’“
• Jeffries (D-NY) – Democratic House Leader – 7/14/26 Dear Colleague: “Consistent with the position articulated by Ranking Member of the Appropriations Committee Rosa DeLauro, Ranking Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee Greg Meeks and pro-peace organizations like J Street, I will be voting no on Republican Amendment #8 being offered to the National Security, Department of State and Related Programs Appropriations Act. As written, it is overly broad in that it prohibits or would limit the use of funds for longstanding initiatives related to humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building and U.S. Embassy operations. In addition, the so-called Massie amendment would restrict our country’s ability to confront Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of both the United States and Israel. In my view, there are more decisive ways to achieve the urgent change necessary when it comes to the far-right Netanyahu government. Republican leaders are desperately trying to weaponize an amendment they do not support for nakedly partisan reasons. However, given the strongly held views throughout the Caucus in this important area of foreign policy, we are not whipping this vote. Based on the extensive conversations we have had as a Caucus, there are good faith reasons that will result in Members voting in a variety of different ways with respect to the amendment. Moving forward, it is my strongly held view that for the good of Israel and the Palestinian people, American policy in the Middle East must change. Commitment to a Just and Lasting Peace: The far-right Netanyahu government has isolated Israel from much of the world, severely damaged its standing in the U.S., jeopardized normalization efforts in the region and repeatedly undermined prospects for peace. A major reset is necessary based on two core principles. To begin with, America’s commitment to Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and homeland for the Jewish people must remain ironclad. Equally significant, the United States must strongly support the creation of an independent Palestinian state that provides dignity, respect and self-determination for the Palestinian people. A process to achieve that goal, ultimately including regional partnerships similar to the Abraham Accords, should be set into motion forthwith. Gaza and the West Bank:  There must be a complete reconstruction and modernization of Gaza. Humanitarian assistance should be surged to alleviate the suffering that Palestinian civilians have experienced as a result of the devastating war. Hamas must be disarmed and removed from power. Financial resources to support peace-building efforts between Israel and the Palestinian people should be enhanced. Economic development efforts in the West Bank and Gaza must be substantially strengthened. As outlined in H.R. 3045, legislation I support, West Bank settlement activity and expansion is illegal under international law. The reprehensible settler violence against the Palestinian people must end. All perpetrators of this violence, settlers or otherwise, should be sanctioned and held criminally accountable. The Future of the Memorandum of Understanding: The current 10-year Memorandum of Understanding entered into by President Barack Obama and the Israeli government in 2016 expires imminently. A meaningful change in direction is needed. Israel has an advanced economy and is capable of paying for its own sophisticated weapons, as the Prime Minister recently acknowledged. Accordingly, any future security arrangement between our two countries should be structured consistently with defense agreements that exist with our other Western allies and strictly adhere to our human rights laws and values. At the same time, a new security arrangement should undergird the maintenance of Israel’s qualitative military edge against Iran and other malign actors in the region. Mutually beneficial joint technology, innovation, research and further development of defensive programs like Iron Dome, Arrow and David’s Sling should be prioritized…”
• Larsen (D-WA) 7/15/26: “I voted ‘no’ on a Republican amendment that would have prohibited any diplomatic, humanitarian, development or security funding related to Israel. I support Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. The amendment would have stopped critical U.S. efforts in the region to distribute humanitarian aid, resettle refugees, support security collaboration with Palestinians and promote peace. I continue to support humanitarian aid to Palestinians, a ceasefire, reconstruction in Gaza and a two-state solution where Israel and a Palestinian state exist securely side-by-side. I continue to oppose extremism in Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government, any effort by Israel to take over Gaza and the continued expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.“
• Larson (D-CT) 7/15/26: “The humanitarian crisis in Gaza demands an immediate surge of aid to innocent civilians. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s blockade and President Trump’s failure to enforce existing human rights laws have prolonged needless suffering for far too long. The amendment before us today would make that crisis worse by blocking aid to Palestinian refugees, defunding peacebuilding programs, and pushing a two-state solution further out of reach. That is why I voted against it. Hamas’s attack on October 7 was abhorrent. The indiscriminate bombing and suffering of the Palestinian people are abhorrent. The rise in antisemitism around the world is abhorrent. We must condemn all of these injustices clearly and without contradiction. I will continue to oppose anyone who undermines peace, including actions by the Netanyahu government that threaten a viable two-state solution. The Trump Administration must enforce existing restrictions on weapons transfers while ensuring that food, medicine, shelter, and other humanitarian aid reach civilians. Prime Minister Netanyahu must restore access to Gaza for aid workers and halt any effort to annex the West Bank. I am a cosponsor of the West Bank Violence Prevention Act, which would sanction those who commit violence in the West Bank, and I support restoring funding for UNRWA to help deliver humanitarian relief at the scale this crisis requires. The United States must protect civilians, uphold international law, and pursue a lasting peace in which Israelis and Palestinians can live with safety, dignity, and self-determination.”
• Lee (D-NV) 7/15/26: X-post – “Today, I voted against an amendment that would eliminate all U.S. aid to Israel – including funds for humanitarian aid, peacebuilding programs, and refugee resettlement. Ripping the rug out from under our ally amidst active attacks from Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other sworn enemies of the U.S. and Israel would endanger not only innocent civilians and U.S. personnel in the region, but also our national security here at home. Current U.S. funding for Israel is not, and should never be, a “blank check.” It is subject to congressional oversight, longstanding laws, and a 10-year agreement signed by then-President Obama. This agreement expires soon, and for the U.S.-Israel alliance to continue standing strong, reforms are desperately needed. We cannot turn a blind eye to the horrors being committed by the Netanyahu government against innocent Palestinians, attempts to annex the West Bank, or violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in the region. Israel must uphold international humanitarian standards and adhere to the laws of armed conflict, even when those who seek to do harm to the country and its people might ignore those principles. The U.S. has both a moral and strategic imperative to ensure Israel can defend itself. I have been steadfast in my support for funding to protect innocent civilians – funding that this amendment would immediately end. At the same time, as Israel continues to evolve economically, the terms of U.S. aid to Israel should also evolve. To be clear: under future agreements, we must ensure Israel abides by the same terms we require of other allies purchasing U.S. arms. As we renegotiate the terms of the agreement, the U.S. should maintain an ultimate goal of fostering long term peace in the region. That process should not fall solely on our shoulders, but also on a coalition of nations, and should include economic, diplomatic, and military support.“
• Levin (D-CA) 7/15/26: “The suffering caused by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is staggering. Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and families across the region, Israeli and Palestinian alike, have endured unimaginable loss. American policy must confront these realities honestly, not diminish them. The Massie amendment on the House floor today does not live up to that standard. Its overly broad language could strip funding from peacebuilding initiatives between Israelis and Palestinians, humanitarian aid for Palestinians in desperate need, refugee resettlement, and American diplomacy. It would hand the Trump Administration the power to decide what gets funded and what does not. The communities I represent know all too well what happens when President Trump spends taxpayer dollars however he sees fit. In my role on the House Appropriations Committee, I refuse to cede a single inch of my fight to reclaim Congress’s power of the purse from rogue, unelected Trump officials like Russ Vought. This amendment gives them more discretion, not less. I firmly believe in a future where Israelis and Palestinians live side by side in peace, security, and self-determination. Prime Minister Netanyahu and the extremists he has empowered are actively working to make that future impossible. He has prolonged the war to preserve his own political survival and given a platform to those who dream of permanent occupation and annexation. I have made clear that Netanyahu must go. This fall, Israelis will have the chance to elect a new government dedicated to the dignity and security of both peoples, and I hope they will seize it. The violence settlers are inflicting on Palestinian families in the West Bank is abhorrent. It must end. That is why I have cosponsored the West Bank Violence Prevention Act to hold perpetrators accountable. Gaza must be rebuilt, and aid to its residents must flow unimpeded. Palestinians deserve to live free from bombardment, displacement, and blockade. Hamas must be disarmed so a viable path to peace exists. And as the United States negotiates the next Memorandum of Understanding on security assistance, I will insist it include real accountability. American aid must comply fully with American law, and it must never underwrite settlement expansion, annexation, or the collective punishment of civilians. None of this is easy. It demands a more principled, inclusive, and constructive kind of American leadership than the one we have now. I will keep fighting for policies that bring us closer to a just and lasting peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”
• Liccardo (D-CA) 7/15/26: “...Last week, I reached out to more than a dozen leading voices in our Jewish community to personally deliver bad news about my position on U.S. military funding to Israel. The response I received was telling: while most didn’t agree with me on cutting military aid, several (on both sides of the issue) urged that I pick any other opportunity to do so, rather than associating myself with a deeply divisive right-wing figure like Mr. Massie. I’m reminded of the words of Ron Heifetz and Marty Linsky: leadership requires disappointing your friends at a rate they can tolerate.“
• McClain Delainy (D-MD) 7/15/26: “The future of the U.S.-Israel relationship requires serious, thoughtful policy, not political grandstanding. I voted against Representative Massie’s amendment stripping foreign military financing for Israel because it was poorly drafted, overly broad, undermined humanitarian aid, and failed to reflect the critical threats facing our country and global order.  My vote should not be mistaken as support for unconditional military aid to Israel. I do not support providing a blank check to any government, and U.S. assistance must be consistent with our laws, interests, and values. I believe the Democratic Caucus stands united in our hopes for a lasting peace and a two-state solution. We must consider the long-term effects of changing U.S. foreign policy. Forcing a vote on a cynical, unserious amendment that won’t be made into law is counterproductive. The United States should continue to support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and to defend itself. That said, I urge the Netanyahu government to demonstrate a deeper commitment to humanitarian assistance, to safeguard innocent civilian lives, to put an end to settler violence on the West Bank, and advance a realistic path towards a two-state solution. Next Congress, we will thoroughly and intelligently revisit the expiring Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and Israel. We will have an opportunity to reshape the U.S.-Israel relationship to ensure respect for human rights and strong regional defense for U.S. interests and our Middle Eastern allies. As we look to the future, I want to be clear: the question is not whether we should change U.S. policy, but instead about what those changes should be.”
• Nadler (D-NY) 7/15/26: “Today the House voted on H.R. 8595, the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2027. This legislation will weaken diplomatic and development capacities critical to national security and further isolate America on the global stage. Among other devastating cuts, it slashes $1.1 billion from international organizations—a blatant attempt to undermine American diplomacy around the world, as well as efforts to bolster global health and combat the climate crisis. The bill also includes specific and heinous attacks on women and LGBTQ+ individuals globally. Republicans also cruelly attached unrelated legislation to this bill that would undermine Americans’ democratic rights, including the fundamental right to vote, in service of a cynical partisan political agenda. In addition to the underlying bill, the House also considered several dangerous amendments, including amendments that would undermine efforts to build a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Most significantly, the overly broad Massie amendment, which imposes a blanket prohibition on any funds in the bill being used for Israel, including embassy operations, critical peacebuilding programs like the Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace Program (MEPPA), and more. MEPPA is the legacy of my dear late friend and colleague Nita Lowey and plays a critical role in peacebuilding and people-to-people relations between Israelis and Palestinians. Such efforts are absolutely necessary for real progress ever to be made in the region towards a viable, lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. I have made no secret my opinion of Prime Minister Netanyahu. I have often called him the worst leader in Jewish history since the Maccabean king who invited the Romans into Jerusalem over 2100 years ago. Netanyahu is responsible for Israel’s war crimes in Gaza, growing isolation in the region and around the world, and partisan politicization within American politics. He is responsible for the attempts to undermine Israel’s democratic character in service of keeping himself from facing justice, and for using the lives of innocent Israeli and Palestinian civilians as political pawns in his monomaniacal quest to cling to power. Under his leadership, Hamas grew a stronghold in Gaza with tragically disastrous results, and the Palestinian Authority has been shortsightedly weakened, undermining any viable alternative. Settler violence has surged in the West Bank, and new Palestinian terrorist entities have arisen. In short, Netanyahu has been a disaster for Israel and for all those around the world concerned with the future of the region. I do not question the many well-intentioned supporters of the amendment who voted for it as a means of sending a message of disapproval of Israel’s actions. I share their disapproval of these actions, and I will never shy away from expressing my critiques of Israel’s behavior loudly and publicly without fear. However, I refuse to support prohibiting funding for the very peace-building programs and activities that are perhaps our best hope at present of improving the reality on the ground and building towards long-term peace. These programs, funded in memory of Chairwoman Lowey, are persistently under attack, with their funding under constant risk. I simply will not join those undermining the heroic efforts of these peace-seekers…Today’s legislation will make the world less safe and less secure for generations to come. Unfortunately, I was unable to vote due to a family medical emergency in New York. Had I been present, I would have voted against this deeply shameful bill and the dangerous amendments considered by the House. When this bill is sent to the Senate, I urge them to take a more responsible course.”
• Panetta (D-CA) 7/14/26: “Mr. Speaker, I rise to state my intention to vote against H. Res. 1423, the rule for consideration of H.R. 8595, National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. I oppose the resolution as written so that the House of Representatives can advance my amendment to Massie Amendment No. 8, printed therein. Should the Rules Committee meet again, I would offer an amendment to the Massie Amendment that would read, ‘After page 1 1ine 6 insert the following: (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority, or the broader region, nor shall it be construed to prevent support of Palestinian Security Forces in the West Bank, and nor shall it be construed to prevent the delivery of defensive weapons for the protection of Palestinians and Israelis.’  This would prevent the passage of the Massie Amendment from impacting the delivery of humanitarian aid and items critical for defense. However, without the opportunity to advance my amendment, I will oppose  H. Res. 1423.” [this was Panetta’s statement on the resolution adopting the Rule to bring HR 8595 to the floor]
• Riley (D-NY) 7/15/26: X-post – “The Netanyahu Government’s reckless and belligerent leadership has inflicted unacceptable suffering, undermined peace, and made the world less safe. American policy in the Middle East must change–for the security of Israel, the dignity and freedom of the Palestinian people, America’s interests, and the prospect of a lasting peace. I voted against the Massie Amendment because it is the wrong way to achieve that goal. America can and should hold the Netanyahu Government accountable without breaking our alliances and commitments, undermining humanitarian aid and diplomatic efforts, and defunding State Department services that assist constituents abroad. I remain committed to a two-state solution that advances America’s interests and guarantees Israelis’ and Palestinians’ right to live in dignity and in peace and security.”
• Rivas (D-CA) 7/15/26: “Foreign policy, especially issues involving the Middle East, should be considered by lawmakers in a thoughtful and strategic approach. Unfortunately, while I disagree with many of the actions of far-right Netanyahu, the Republican amendment is a poorly drafted and hyper-partisan amendment. More specifically, this amendment endangers the delivery of crucial humanitarian aid. Our country was in a different position when President Barack Obama entered the United States into a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 2016. With the expiration of this MOU imminent, I believe change to our Middle East policy must happen to ensure the safety and security of both Israelis and Palestinians. These changes cannot come from a disgruntled Republican Member’s amendment that aims to divide Democrats and only allows for ten minutes of debate on the House Floor. For these reasons, I voted ‘no’ on this amendment, and will continue working with my colleagues to address the needs of both the Israeli and Palestinian people.“
• Schneider (D-IL) 7/15/26: “Today’s Massie amendment vote will have no legislative impact, and it does nothing to advance the prospects for peace in the Middle East. This cynical Republican amendment was put forward to stoke division and divide people here in the United States, not to end the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians or provide a path forward.  I will seek to understand how such a flawed legislative proposal – one that would hurt Israelis and Palestinians, as well as America’s standing in the world – generated support. We must work to rebuild a bipartisan consensus that supports Israel’s security and sovereignty as a Jewish and democratic state, while also recognizing the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people to self-determination, and ultimately statehood.”
• Sherman (D-CA) 7/15/26: X-post w/ video clip – “The Massie amendment sends a clear signal to the enemies of America that we are willing to abandon our allies and our own security. I stood against this anti-Israel, pro-terror amendment.”
• Sherman (D-CA): floor-statement –“Madam Chair, President Obama signed a 10-year memorandum of understanding. We are now in the ninth year of that memorandum. Mr. Massie would have us repudiate that signature. That is as bad an idea as Donald Trump’s repudiation of the JCPOA, the deal with Iran that limited its nuclear program. We are told that this is about offensive weapons. This $3.3 billion provides the AMRAAM system that defends Israeli apartment buildings and houses from incoming missiles that have as one purpose: to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible. How are we going to influence the people of Israel and the government of Israel? They need our influence. They need to change their policies. How are we going to influence them? As the missiles are coming in for the sole purpose of killing as many civilians as possible, we say we will not help shoot them down. We will not fund the AMRAAM system that is provided for in a memorandum of understanding signed by President Obama. This amendment is a political stunt. Republican leadership has brought it to the floor–not for the purpose of having it become law, but for the purpose of driving a wedge through the middle of the Democratic Party, for the purpose of facilitating Republican advertisements that will put our party on the side of those who are screaming death to America and death to Israel, and to put our party on the side of those who say that Israel has no right to exist. If you care about not only our Middle East policy but you care about the Democratic Party’s position, with the American people, then you must vote “no” on this amendment. Now that does not mean that there will not be future reductions in our aid to Israel. That does not mean that we will not try to change Israeli policy, but this amendment goes as far as it possibly can to put us on the side not of those who would shoot down the missiles that are aimed at civilian neighborhoods in Israel but on those who are cheering those missiles. Then we are told that the amount of money involved is the focus. It says $3.3 billion, but that is about an 80th of the aid that we have provided Ukraine and that we should have provided Ukraine. This is not an attempt to divert a large portion of our money from Israel. This is an attack on the Israeli people.”
• Subramanyan (D-CA) 7/15/26: “As the War in Iran drags on for the 5th month, House Republicans pushed a funding bill to the floor for the State Department that further isolates our country. It contains 20% less funding for our diplomatic and international development work and it doesn’t include any funding for UNICEF or the United Nations, which will allow our adversaries to fill in the gaps. It cuts $500 million for global health programs, including HIV/AIDS prevention and health security, which means we will see more outbreaks and deaths. The House also voted on several partisan, ‘gotcha’ amendments but failed to take up bipartisan amendments. For instance, while we need to have a serious conversation about our financial support for Israel and other countries in the region given the Iran war, these amendments were poorly conceived and would have undermined peacebuilding programs and embassy operations.  My own amendments on humanitarian aid to Gaza as well as Sudan, USAID, and preventing corruption in foreign policy were all ruled out of order by House Republicans and did not even get a vote.  The Trump administration and House Republicans have been a complete failure on foreign policy.”
• Sykes (D-OH) 7/15/26: “…”Israel is one of our most important allies and I strongly support its security and right to defend itself. I opposed this amendment because it would have eliminated all funding for the American Embassy in Israel under this bill and cut billions in foreign aid to Israel, and also the Palestinian and Lebanese people. At this moment of continued volatility in the region, it is critical that the ceasefire be respected and that all parties avoid actions that could further escalate tensions. Long-term stability will depend on restraint, diplomacy, and a sustained commitment to peace and security for the region.“
• Vindman (D-VA) 7/15/26: “Under Prime Minister Netanyahu’s leadership, Israel has lost its way. His decisions have undermined Israel’s long-term security, strained our alliance, and made Americans, Israelis, and Palestinians less safe. Yet, as a Jewish refugee who fled oppression in the Soviet Union, I have long believed that Israel is a refuge for many families like mine. These convictions made this one of the most difficult votes I’ve cast because Israel needs to change course. However, I could not support an amendment as poorly written as this one that would eliminate key funding provisions that support Palestinian security forces, humanitarian aid, and defensive systems to protect innocent civilians.”
• Walkinshaw (D-VA) 7/15/26: “…The Massie amendment would have eliminated $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing for Israel and barred funds for humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building efforts, and U.S. Embassy operations. This poorly-drafted amendment would have cut longstanding initiatives like the Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace and Middle East Regional Cooperation programs, which promote dialogue and reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians. It also would have hamstrung U.S. intelligence and diplomatic efforts to protect Americans from Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations. For those reasons, I joined pro-peace organizations like J Street in opposing the amendment. Its overly broad language threatened important peacebuilding work, and I believe there are better ways to confront the far-right Netanyahu government and secure the lasting peace that Palestinians, Lebanese people, and Israelis deserve. Clearly, U.S. policy toward the Middle East and Israel must change. Historically, Israel has been an important U.S. ally, and a strong U.S.-Israel relationship remains in America’s interest, but only if it is based on shared values of democracy and human rights. Increasingly, the Netanyahu government takes actions that fail to reflect those values. The 10-year Memorandum of Understanding signed under President Obama has provided security support to Israel and will soon expire. Israel is a wealthy nation with an advanced economy and, moving forward, should pay for its own weapons. Israel faces real security threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and others. But the current Israeli government’s military campaigns have caused massive civilian casualties in Gaza and Lebanon, destabilized the region, and not made Israelis safer. I’m particularly troubled by illegal settlement expansion and settler violence in the West Bank, which push a two-state solution — still the only viable path to security and prosperity for both peoples — further out of reach. To replace the expiring MOU, Prime Minister Netanyahu is seeking an expanded security arrangement that deepens cooperation between the U.S. and Israeli militaries. I will not support that expansion until there is an end to illegal West Bank settlement activity, real progress toward peace and reconstruction in Gaza, and an end to Netanyahu’s failed, never-ending total war approach.”

---

Members of Congress voting PRESENT on the Massie Amendment to bar all US aid to Israel:

• Bera (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I will vote present on today’s amendment put forward by Representative Thomas Massie to eliminate all funding for Israel in the State Department and National Security appropriations bill. I have long supported the U.S.-Israel relationship and believe in Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state. I also firmly believe that a two-state solution is the only path to lasting peace, security, and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians alike. Achieving that goal will require a change in America’s approach toward the Netanyahu government. This amendment is poorly drafted and overly broad. It would go beyond military assistance and restrict funding for humanitarian aid, refugee assistance, peacebuilding efforts, and U.S. diplomatic operations. Cutting these programs would undermine our ability to promote peace and stability in Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, and the broader region. At the same time, I cannot vote against this amendment because I do not condone the Netanyahu government’s conduct of the war in Gaza and the resulting humanitarian crisis, its actions in Lebanon, its failure to confront escalating settler violence in the West Bank, and its role in drawing the United States into the current war with Iran. My present vote reflects my opposition to both the amendment as written and the policies of the Netanyahu government.”
• Brown (D-OH) 7/15/26: “The Massie amendment was a false choice between eliminating all U.S. assistance to Israel, including humanitarian aid, and accepting the Trump-Netanyahu status quo. Foreign policy decisions this important shouldn’t be made via sloppy amendments to partisan spending bills. I voted against the underlying bill and present on the amendment because it’s time to send a message that U.S. policy must evolve. As a supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship and a believer that a two-state solution is critical to achieving real peace, I am severely concerned that the Netanyahu government is continuing on the exact wrong course. It’s time for Congress to have an honest debate about how our policy must change to truly advance Israel’s security, protect Palestinian dignity, and promote stability in the Middle East.”
• Elfreth (D-MD) 7/15/26: “America’s relationship with our only liberal, democratic ally in the Middle East, Israel, deserves a serious policy discussion. The amendment that Representative Massie, a member with a record of antisemitism, put forward was instead political grandstanding – it was a ploy to divide Democrats masquerading as a legitimate policy debate. This amendment was written so broadly that it would further destabilize the Middle East and cut a wide range of longstanding funding for humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, and peace-building initiatives throughout the region, including the West Bank. We voted on this poorly written, sledgehammer of an amendment because Republicans were having a bad week politically – and they wanted Democrats to have a worse one. I refuse to participate in the brazenly political games of Republican leadership, which is why I decided to take my first present vote in Congress. In taking this vote, I also want to make clear that the current dynamics of our allyship are not sustainable for the region and our nation. Over the past decade, the Israeli and the United States governments have experienced a serious, far-right shift under Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Trump. The American people feel unheard. This extremism has led the United States into an unnecessary, unconstitutional war with Iran, where the United States lost 14 servicemembers in combat and is currently spending untold billions of American taxpayer dollars – restarting strikes just this week. We must be clear-eyed in confronting the extremist leadership that is jeopardizing peace, a two-state solution, and American leadership abroad. Our responsibility is clear. Our two countries must together strengthen our democratic alliances worldwide, eradicate terrorism, adhere to the highest human rights standards, and focus on building a lasting peace for the region. While there is much work ahead, I have long held the belief and the resolute hope in a lasting two-state solution. The people of Israel deserve safety and security, and the United States should continue to bipartisanly affirm Israel’s right to exist. The Palestinian people deserve self-determination and a surge of humanitarian aid – the exact type of aid that this amendment cuts. This decades-long issue is larger than our current leadership. It is our responsibility to craft and advance meaningful foreign policies that ensure all people – Israeli and Palestinian alike – can live and thrive without fear of violence. Today’s amendment failed to meet that serious standard.”
• Huffman (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I almost never vote ‘present,’ but this amendment leaves me little choice. I support the central message behind it and have consistently opposed the Israeli government’s unhinged policies of aggression, brutality, and territorial expansion. I’ve demonstrated that through my support for measures like the Lebanon War Powers Resolution, the Block the Bombs Act, Rep. McCollum’s justice for Palestinians initiatives, and countless other legislative efforts to hold the Israeli government accountable for reprehensible actions. But I cannot offer blanket support for an amendment so poorly drafted that it could be construed to go far beyond blocking offensive military assistance. As written, it risks cutting off support for humanitarian organizations, peacebuilding efforts, and protections for vulnerable Palestinians. On an issue this consequential, Congress has a responsibility to legislate with precision, not substitute sloppy drafting for serious policymaking.”
• McCollum (D-MN) 7/15/26: “I have long been a vocal opponent of the way the United States provides a blank check to the Netanyahu government. For the last nine years, I have carried a bill to put limits on how all US dollars to Israel may be used, which would ensure that not one penny of taxpayer dollars is used by Israel to violate the human rights of Palestinian children. I am also a cosponsor on legislation like the Block the Bombs Act, which also places limits on US assistance to Israel. However, I cannot support Mr. Massie’s amendment as I have serious concerns that with the way it is so broadly written. As drafted, other foreign assistance—including vital assistance to Palestinians—could be cut off as well. For many of my colleagues in the majority, this amendment is just another way for them to carry out President Trump’s isolationist agenda to limit and, in some cases completely cease, US foreign assistance.”
• Pappas (D-NH) 7/15/26: “I cannot support this amendment as written because it is overly broad. Enacting it would hamstring our humanitarian efforts in the region by limiting funding for programs that support Palestinian economic development and peacebuilding efforts between Israelis and Palestinians. It would also weaken our ability to combat Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations that threaten Americans and our allies. At the same time, I have deep concerns about the path Prime Minister Netanyahu continues to pursue that undermines the long term security objectives of Israel and the United States. This path won’t lead to peace, only to more war and instability. The United States must stand for security and self-determination for Israelis and Palestinians alike. I voted present today because I cannot support this amendment as written but also cannot support the disproportionate, extreme policies of the Netanyahu government.”
• Thompson (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I stand firmly against sending offensive weapons to Israel. Prime Minister Netanyahu has caused a humanitarian crisis in Gaza and I continue to call for the protection of Palestinian civilians, a surge of humanitarian aid in Gaza, and a two-state solution to bring peace and self-determination to Israelis and Palestinians. I cannot support this amendment because it is so poorly drafted and overly broad that it would defund our efforts to protect civilians and promote peace, taking us farther from our goals. At the same time, I stand firmly against Netanyahu’s conduct in Gaza and his efforts to drag us into conflict with Iran. I voted ‘present’ in protest of Netanyahu and in solidarity with our peacekeeping efforts. This amendment was proposed by an extremist as an unserious solution to an incredibly serious issue and I refuse to play cheap political games when it comes to matters of global conflict.”

---

Members of Congress voting YES on the Massie Amendment to bar all US aid to Israel:

Group statements:

• Statement by 27 members – Balint (D-VT), Beyer (D-VA),  Casar (D-TX), Chu (D-CA),  DeSaulnier (D-CA), Dexter (D-OR),  Garamendi (D-CA), García (D-IL), Grijalva (D-AZ), Hoyle (D-OR), Jackson (D-IL), Jacobs (D-CA), Jayapal (D-WA), Johnson (D-GA), Lynch (D-MA),  McGovern (D-MA), Pingree (D-ME), Pocan (D-WI),  Pressley (D-MA), Ramirez (D-IL), Randall (D-WA), Schakowsky (D-IL), Simon (D-CA), Stansbury (D-NM), Tokuda (D-HI), Watson Coleman (D-NJ), and Velázquez (D-NY) 7/15/26: “As Members of Congress, it is our duty to ensure that our constituents’ hard-earned money is used in a way that advances America’s interests and values. For this reason, we do not support providing an additional $3.3 billion of American taxpayer dollars to be used for Israeli military operations in Gaza and Lebanon—operations which have killed tens of thousands of civilians, led to the indiscriminate destruction of civilian infrastructure, and caused severe and ongoing humanitarian catastrophes. These are just the latest in a long string of human rights violations inflicted on Palestinian civilians. For nearly six decades, Israeli security forces and military authorities have enforced the occupation of the Palestinian territories, including through restrictions on freedom of movement, arbitrary detention, torture, and extrajudicial killings. It is clear that existing human rights conditions on the use of American security assistance have not been meaningfully enforced. Enough is enough. Palestinians and Israelis alike deserve peace, freedom, security, stability, and self-determination. Those aims will only be achieved when their inherent dignity and inalienable rights are at the center of U.S. policy in the region. Diplomacy is the answer, and as long as America provides constant funding for more war, peace will always remain out of reach.  Our vote should not be interpreted as opposition to initiatives such as the Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace Act programs or others that foster people-to-people engagement, strengthen civil society, and advance the long-term prospects for a just and lasting peace. We remain committed to supporting these and similar programs while ensuring that U.S. taxpayer dollars advance peace, security, and American interests and values.”
• Statement release by Pettersen (D-CO), Crow (D-CO), DeGette (D-CO), and Neguse (D-CO) 7/15/26: “Today we voted against additional taxpayer-funded military aid being given to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government. We support Israel’s right to exist and defend itself. We believe that both Israelis and Palestinians have the right to safety, security, and self-determination. We should not be giving military aid to any country that does not comply with our own laws and values. The Netanyahu government has failed to meet these standards. The status quo is not tenable. We need a different path forward for America’s foreign policy rooted in values and consistent application of the law.”

Individual statements:

• Amo (D-RI) 7/15/26: “The United States-Israel relationship should be grounded in shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law, and an aspiration for a peaceful future. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government, however, has repeatedly violated these principles.  The rhetoric and actions of extremists, like Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, make it impossible to defend the status quo.  The suffering of civilians in Gaza is unacceptable, the unchecked settlement expansion is reckless, and continued settler violence is unconscionable.  President Trump’s blank check to Netanyahu has allowed a dangerous course that undermines the prospect of peace. Representative Massie’s amendment is poorly constructed and overly broad, and I do not agree with many of the sentiments he’s publicly expressed. But it remains abundantly clear that the United States government must begin charting a new course that upholds American values in the Middle East, protects our national security interests, and demands accountability for how U.S. taxpayer dollars are used. I support Israel’s right to exist. I will continue to support defensive efforts that save civilian lives, including Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and the Arrow systems — none of which would be impacted by this amendment — while making clear that our dollars should not be divorced from our values. This vote is not about abandoning Israel. It’s about rejecting the false choice Republicans are presenting between a blank check for Netanyahu’s extremist coalition and walking away from the Israeli people. I will continue to push for a different path that advances humanitarian relief, defeats Hamas, and achieves a just and lasting peace that provides security, dignity, and self-determination for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”
• Ansari (D-AZ) 7/15/26: X-post – “Today, I will vote yes on an amendment to block $3.3 billion in offensive military assistance to the Israeli government. Netanyahu’s campaigns in Gaza, Lebanon, the West Bank, and Iran have been horrific. Not one more taxpayer dollar should fund war and destruction instead of lowering costs for Americans. While I strongly support humanitarian programs, approximately 98.5% of this funding is offensive military financing. Congress must use our leverage to advance a just and durable peace for everyone in the region.”
• Auchincloss (D-MA) 7/15/26: X-post – “I am voting Yes on the amendment to State Department appropriations to zero out $3.3 billion in foreign military financing for Israel. If enacted, this measure would prevent the U.S. government from financing and selling attack aircraft, bombs & missiles, and targeting systems to the Israel Defense Forces. It would not affect U.S. support for Israel’s Iron Dome, David’s Sling, or Arrow air-defense systems. The authority from Congress to finance and sell American-made weapons to allies is a grant of trust to both a presidential administration and its counterparty heads of government. With their disastrous war against Iran, their empowerment of settler violence in the West Bank, and their strategic incoherence against Islamist terrorism, both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu have sacrificed that trust. Congress must act where the executives have failed. I acknowledge that this amendment is not the ideal mechanism of action. Its sponsor, Representative Thomas Massie, recently ran a re-election campaign that featured antisemitic tropes. Also, the State Department has not issued clear guidance about whether the amendment could affect humanitarian programming, embassy operations, or West Bank security assistance; if the amendment becomes law, I will work with colleagues to hold harmless those efforts. I have weighed these problems against the central thrust of the amendment: there must be consequences for Trump and Netanyahu. Those consequences should not impair the State of Israel’s right to defend itself against the atrocities of the terrorist regimes that threaten it. Israel and the United States have common interests, shared values, and a long history. Israel and the United States are allies. Before the next appropriations cycle in 2027, when this policy will again be up for debate, Israel will hold elections, the repercussions of the debacle in the Strait of Hormuz will become more clear, and negotiations between the United States and Israel over what replaces the Memorandum of Understanding will pick up pace. This presents an opportunity to renew the U.S.-Israel alliance on shared principles and a bipartisan basis.” The Editor-in-Chief of Jewish Insider responded on X: “This is the statement a Dem lawmaker releases when they’re trying to appease the rising anti-Israel forces within the party:” Auchincloss’s retort: “This is not about politics. American soldiers are dead. At the heart of FMF was a deal: – America ensures QME for Israel to fight terrorists; – Israel never asks Americans to wage its wars. Netanyahu & Trump broke that deal with this Iran debacle.“
• Beyer (D-VA) 7/15/26: “It is past time for our nation to fundamentally reevaluate its security relationship with the state of Israel. A military response to the heinous October 7th attacks was justifiable, but Israel’s ongoing campaigns across the region have cost the lives of tens of thousands of innocents and isolated Israel on the world stage. The wanton disregard for the human rights of civilians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon shown by the Israeli government and security forces, along with their contempt for international and U.S. law and implacable commitment to an ever-expanding campaign of settlement and occupation have made a dramatic course correction in the U.S.-Israeli partnership long overdue. The disastrous Iran War has further demonstrated the strategic costs of our alliance which has grown closer even as it makes less sense for the United States. No foreign government is entitled to American taxpayer dollars or assistance, particularly those that have acted against U.S. interests and values, as Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has done increasingly in recent years. While imperfectly written, this amendment serves as a powerful message to the Israeli government that it cannot take U.S. security assistance for granted any longer. The enormous numbers of civilians killed in recent Israel Defense Force operations and the government’s tacit approval for the ongoing violence carried out by settlers in the West Bank has cost Israel the broad support among Americans it once enjoyed. It will likely take years to repair the ties between our two nations and for Israel’s government to regain the trust of the American people.”
• Brownley (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I unequivocally believe in Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state, and I am unwavering in my belief that Israel has the right to defend its people against hostile governments and proxy groups that seek its destruction. I also firmly believe that the Palestinian people have a right to dignity, security, and self-determination. I also believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s actions in the Middle East have deeply undermined these efforts and recklessly escalated tensions in the region. His government’s actions have not advanced the cause of peace or security and have instead left both Israelis and Palestinians less safe. I do not see how we can continue down this path without a course correction. I recognize that Rep. Massie’s amendment is not a serious effort to solve the current state of affairs in the Middle East. It’s also clear to me that the Republicans and the President have long ago ceased to want to take this historically bipartisan issue seriously, and to thoughtfully engage with Democrats to provide the leadership necessary to find a path forward to ending the violence, rebuilding Gaza, and securing the region. My vote in favor of the Massie amendment is simply a vote for that course correction.“
• Carter (D-LA) 7/15/26: “I have always supported Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas and other terrorist organizations that threaten its people. Israel has the right to live in peace and security, and nothing in my position should be interpreted otherwise. But our support for an ally does not mean we should remain silent when innocent lives are being lost on such a devastating scale. The deaths of thousands of Palestinian civilians, especially women and children, the destruction of homes, hospitals, schools, and vital infrastructure, and the ongoing humanitarian crisis demand that we speak with both honesty and compassion. In my view, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has impeded efforts toward peace and protecting innocent civilians, including from violent attacks by Israeli settlers in the West Bank. America has both the right and the responsibility to ensure that our assistance reflects our values and our commitment to human rights. For that reason, I am supporting Representative Thomas Massie’s amendment. It is a vote for accountability. It is a vote to say that American support should encourage peace, protect innocent lives, and advance the values we stand for as a nation. I continue to support the immediate release of every hostage, a permanent ceasefire, the full delivery of humanitarian aid, and renewed negotiations that lead to two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace, security, and mutual respect. The people of Israel and Palestine deserve to live with dignity and hope. We cannot allow another generation of children to grow up surrounded by violence and loss. I believe in the long-term partnership that the American people have with the people of Israel and in America’s enduring commitment to a more peaceful, stable, and secure Middle East. That future must include dignity, security, and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians. I firmly state that the policies of the Netanyahu government cannot continue. Peace is never easy. But it is always worth pursuing. That is the future I will continue to work toward.”
• Massie (R-KY): floor statement – “…Madam Chair, Israel has the strongest economy in the Middle East. Their debt per GDP is in much better shape than ours. They don’t need our money. In fact, they have claimed recently they want to get off of the welfare. I am concerned that the other funding mechanisms they are talking about, or co-mingling, our technology and supply chains, we will have even less transparency than what is going on here today, so I am opposed to that as well. I am opposed to all foreign aid. I didn’t pick on Israel here. I offered an amendment to defund Egypt and also to defunding aid to Jordan, which we will talk about in a little bit. I am particularly concerned this year about the foreign aid to Israel. There have been 70,000 casualties in Gaza, and I don’t think we should be a part of that. American taxpayers should not be conscripted into funding the military adventures of Israel. Madam Chair, I urge adoption of my amendment…“
• Massie (R-KY) 7/16/26: X-post – “Though my amendment to strike $3.3 billion in aid to Israel from the State Dept Approps bill did not pass, 104 House Members voted in favor of it. The tide is changing. Americans want their tax dollars to be spent improving things here at home, not waging war and genocide.”
• Casar (D-TX) 7/14/26: X-post w/ video clip – “Tomorrow, the House will vote on an amendment to block the $3.3 billion in taxpayer funding we send to Israel’s military. I will vote yes. It is past time for us to end aid used to commit genocide in Gaza, kill innocents in Lebanon and beyond, and help drag us into war with Iran.”
• Casar (D-TX) 7/15/26: X-post – “I just voted to end US funding for Israel’s weapons of war. More Democrats than ever before voted to block funding. That is a victory for the millions of Americans who have demanded an end to our taxpayer dollars going to fund genocide. Tomorrow we get back to work. We will win.”
• Castro (D-TX) 7/15/26: (floor statement) “Madam speaker, Israel does not need, and quite honestly does not deserve, more American money for weapons. Prime Minister Netanyahu has taken Israel down an ugly path. The tragedy of October 7th has become a justification for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Self-defense does not include indiscriminately bombing homes, hospitals, churches, schools or refugee camps. There were even credible reports of children intentionally shot in the head and chest. For decades, our nation gave Israel billions to facilitate peace and a two-state solution. Instead, Israel has chosen more war and more occupation. Today, it occupies not only Gaza and the West Bank, but parts of Syria and Lebanon. If there are no consequences, why in the world would Benjamin Netanyahu change what he’s doing? And words are not enough. Condemnations are not enough. If we hope to change Israel’s behavior, we must use our leverage. The American people have seen this tragedy with their own eyes. They have made their judgment. They do not support giving Israel more weapons. Do not reward a wrongdoer. Now it’s up to us in this chamber to take action.” [video clip]
• Clark (D-MA) – House Democratic Whip – 7/15/26: “…Republicans have also included an overly broad amendment by Rep. Massie that blocks all foreign aid to Israel, including humanitarian funding from Palestinian refugees and civilians in Gaza. This is not an attempt to have a serious and necessary debate about offensive military aid to Israel. It’s more stunts from Congressional Republicans who would rather score cheap political points than lead. However, it is clear that the status quo is not tenable. We should not provide a blank check for military aid to any country that does not comply with U.S. law, interests, and values. The Netanyahu government has failed to meet that standard. I will be voting yes, not because I agree with the entirety of the amendment, or the GOP’s cynical motivations for its consideration, but because I believe we must change course. While Democratic Members will make different decisions on this amendment in good faith, we are absolutely united in our shared goal of permanent peace…“
• Dean (D-PA) 7/15/26: “For nearly three years, I have mourned the unspeakable horrors of October 7th. I have met with the families of the slaughtered and the families of hostages as we fought to bring their loved ones, living and dead, home. I have been to Israel three times since the barbaric Hamas attacks — where I met directly with Prime Minister Netanyahu and members of his administration. I repeatedly implored them to pursue a just war, and warned that Israel would lose support if it did not. At the same time, I have met with Palestinian-Americans, Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank — families who have lost so many and so much; I have met with healthcare and aid workers — both American and international — operating in Gaza and beyond. It is evident that Mr. Netanyahu’s government continues to inflict atrocities and unspeakable crimes in Gaza and the West Bank, on innocent Palestinians, so many of them children.  That is why today I voted “yes” on Congressman Massie’s flawed amendment — to make clear from me: Not another dime to the Netanyahu government. Israel is a friend and ally of the United States, and I have prized my opportunities to visit and get to know her people. But Netanyahu’s prosecution of this war has not made Israel safer. It has not brought stability to the Middle East. And it has not lived up to our American ideals or international law. And, yes, the Massie amendment is deeply flawed; it is too broadly written, and I have great concern for the State Department’s potential to cut funding for humanitarian aid. Yet I want long-term peace, security, sovereignty, dignity, and hope for the Israeli and Palestinian people. Therefore, I cannot support more funding for Mr. Netanyahu’s continuing atrocities. While my colleagues in our Democratic Caucus may cast a variety of votes, we are all united in our hope for long-term peace — just as the Jewish tradition teaches Tikkun Olam.”
• DeLuzio (D-PA) 7/15/26: X-post – “The American people are sick and tired of seeing our American dollars sent overseas to arm Israel’s military while Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government regularly flouts U.S. and International law. We need a very different relationship, and that’s why I voted ‘yes’ today on the Massie Amendment to stop America’s funding of Israel’s weapons of war.”
• DeSaulnier (D-CA) 7/15/26: X-post – “I am voting yes on the Massie amendment to block an additional $3.3 billion in American taxpayer money for Israel’s military operations in Gaza and Lebanon that have already killed tens of thousands of civilians. No more American tax dollars should be used to take us farther from peace.“
• Escobar (D-TX) 7/15/26: ““I will not support sending $3.3 billion to a Netanyahu government that has ignored our laws, interests, and values under both the Biden and Trump administrations. Israel’s operations in Gaza and Lebanon have resulted in staggering civilian casualties, widespread destruction of homes, hospitals, schools, and other essential infrastructure, and an unbearable humanitarian cost, and the surge in state-backed settler violence in the West Bank becomes more alarming by the day. “The Israeli and Palestinian people deserve to live in peace, security, and freedom. But, lasting, durable peace will not be achieved through endless cycles of violence, and providing Netanyahu with an unconditional blank check without accountability and stronger oversight does not make Israel or the U.S. safer, stronger, or more secure. While the Massie amendment is imperfect, I plan to vote ‘yes’.“
• Foushee (D-NC) 7/15/26: “Congress has a responsibility to ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars are used responsibly and that our foreign policy reflects our values, humanitarian standards, and national security interests. Today, I supported Congressman Massie’s amendment because Congress must exercise its oversight role and ensure accountability in how U.S. military assistance is provided…”
• Frost (D-FL) 7/15/26: X-post w/ video clip – “I will be voting yes on the Massie amendment to block $3.3 billion in funding to the Israeli military. Here’s why:“
• Garcia (D-CA) 7/15/26: “Today, I am voting yes on an amendment to block $3.3 billion in American taxpayer dollars for Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli military. Netanyahu, like Donald Trump, is a corrupt authoritarian who should face criminal courts—not receive billions more for weapons. The American people want lower housing costs and more affordable groceries, not more bombs and foreign wars.”
• Garcia (D-IL) 7/15/26: “Throughout my time in Congress, I have consistently advocated to end our government’s use of our tax dollars to fund death and destruction abroad. As the Israeli government continues to commit genocide in Gaza, occupy the West Bank and southern Lebanon, and fuel the illegal war in Iran, my constituents and working people nationwide who are struggling to make ends meet are demanding an end to the blank check for weapons of war. As the Whip of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, I was proud to vote for this amendment and to urge my colleagues to do the same. Today’s historic vote illustrates the momentum behind our movement for peace, justice, and dignity for all people without exception. We must build on this vote to achieve a long overdue change in U.S. policy towards Israel and Palestine, and finally uphold the values we stand for.“
• Garcia (D-IL) 7/15/26: X-post – “As the Whip of the Progressive Caucus, I will vote YES on the Massie Amendment. I urge my colleagues to end the blank check for weapons to Israel.”
• Goodlander (D-NH) 7/16/26: “As a Member of Congress, it is my job to ensure American taxpayer dollars are spent out of necessity – and in a way that advances the interests and values of the United States of America. That is the spirit in which I voted today against sending an additional $3.3 billion American taxpayer dollars to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government. My support for Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself as a Jewish and democratic state is ironclad. The amendment did not affect our support for Israel’s air-defense systems, which remain mission-critical to defending against persistent threats from some of America’s most brutal and determined enemies, including the Islamic Republic of Iran, and its terrorist proxies, including Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas. My support for a peace agreement that guarantees Israel’s security and safeguards the human rights, dignity, and self-determination of the Palestinian people in their own state is equally ironclad. Our alliance with Israel requires a reset. Having ignored the concerns of the vast majority of Americans about its conduct in Gaza, which devastated civilians while ultimately empowering Hamas, and its support for settler violence in the West Bank, the Israeli government cannot expect Americans to continue to provide it with unconditional aid. Subsidizing Israel’s defense budget also no longer makes sense given the country’s wealth and military dominance in its region. Even the Israeli government has acknowledged it no longer needs this support. I am disappointed that Republicans intentionally weaponized this vote, bringing to the floor a deeply imperfect amendment drafted by a lead sponsor whose abhorrent and dangerous track record of virulent antisemitism I wholeheartedly reject and condemn. But my vote today reflects my belief that the United States and Israel should forge a more normal partnership, built not on dependence and aid, but on shared interests, shared principles and mutual accountability as we promote the dignity and security of Israelis and Palestinians alike.“
• Horsford (D-NV) 7/15/26: “Congress has a constitutional responsibility to carefully review every dollar it appropriates and ensure that taxpayer funds reflect our values, our national interests, and the priorities of the American people. That responsibility is especially important when it comes to military assistance overseas. Today’s amendment was buried within a broader partisan appropriations process that continues to neglect the challenges facing working families here at home. Instead of focusing on lowering costs and strengthening America’s future, Republicans continue advancing policies that raise costs for working families while failing to invest in the health care, housing, education, and economic opportunity Americans need to thrive. For many Nevadans, this vote is fundamentally about priorities. They want their tax dollars to reflect the needs of their communities. Congress has a responsibility to exercise meaningful oversight of U.S. military assistance provided to any country. American taxpayer dollars should never be appropriated automatically or without accountability. Security assistance should advance our national security interests, reflect our values, protect innocent civilians, and remain subject to rigorous congressional review. I remain unwavering in my support for Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, for the U.S.-Israel strategic partnership, and for the safety and security of the Jewish people. I unequivocally condemn Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attacks and reject antisemitism in all its forms. Nothing in this amendment affects U.S. support for Israel’s critical defensive systems – including Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow, and THAAD – which remain essential to protecting Israeli civilians and maintaining regional security. At the same time, support for an ally does not require Congress to abandon its oversight responsibilities. I believe Congress has a duty to ensure that assistance to every partner – including Israel – is consistent with American law, our national security interests, and our humanitarian values. I recognize that Members of Congress, including Democrats, reached different conclusions on this amendment in good faith while sharing a common commitment to Israel’s security and America’s alliance with Israel. This amendment is not a comprehensive solution, nor is it the final step toward achieving lasting peace and security in the region. I will continue working to support humanitarian assistance for innocent civilians in Gaza, oppose violence against civilians, including extremist settler violence in the West Bank, and advance the conditions necessary for Israelis and Palestinians alike to live in peace, security, dignity, and self-determination.”
• Houlahan (D-PA) 7/15/26: “I voted YES on Rep. Massie’s amendment to block U.S. military aid to Israel. This was a difficult vote, and there are no perfect options. The amendment as written is ill-defined and not likely to become law. But after years of devastating civilian suffering across the region and with no credible path to peace, I believe the status quo with Prime Minister Netanyahu is no longer tenable. The United States should not provide military assistance as a blank check. Our security partnerships are strongest when they are grounded in accountability, American interests, and our shared values. This vote is not a rejection of Israel’s right to exist or to defend itself. Israel remains one of America’s closest allies, and I continue to support its ability to defend its people against Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and other terrorist organizations and hostile actors. I voted YES because I believe efforts to change course at this time offer the best opportunity to achieve the only outcome that can ultimately succeed: a future of security, dignity, and peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike.“
• Ivey (D-MD) 7/15/26: “House Republicans passed a foreign aid budget that guts American diplomacy, slashes humanitarian assistance when it is needed most, and weakens the tools we rely on to compete and lead in the world. In this funding bill, Republicans have chosen to offer an overly broad amendment by Rep. Massie that blocks all foreign aid to Israel, including humanitarian aid for Palestinian refugees and civilians in Gaza. Although I have serious reservations about Rep. Massie’s amendment, the status quo of supporting the Netanyahu government cannot continue. The U.S.-Israel relationship is important, but it must be reset around accountability, defensive cooperation, respect for international law and a credible path to two states. Despite the amendment’s flaws, voting Yes sent a clear signal that Congress cannot continue treating the current aid relationship as automatic and that American policy must change. During the administration of President Trump and Secretary Hegseth, I have consistently voted against additional funding for the Pentagon and the President’s unauthorized military operations. In particular, I have voted on the floor and in committee against supplemental funding for the Iranian War. President Trump and Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu have dragged our countries into their war of choice with Iran, and I will not support it with American taxpayer dollars. I cannot oppose further funding for unauthorized U.S. military operations in the region while continuing to treat military funds for the Netanyahu government as automatic, particularly when those operations are increasingly intertwined. In a 2024 C-Span interview on the Israel-Hamas war, I laid out my thoughts about what needs to happen in the Middle East to secure peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike. I firmly believe that beyond this vote on the Massie amendment, which would not eliminate funding for Iron Dome and other defensive systems, it is critical for the United States to take the following affirmative steps to improve the situation on the ground in Gaza and the West Bank: 1. supporting a surge in humanitarian aid, especially in Gaza, to alleviate the suffering of Palestinian civilians; 2. opposing settler violence and land incursions in the West Bank, and supporting the criminal prosecution of anyone committing violent acts; 3. continuing to support a secure state for both Israelis and Palestinians, assisted by the United States, Arab states and European allies; and   4. supporting an extended effort to rebuild Gaza in coordination with our Arab partners and European allies — essentially a Marshall Plan 2.0, adapted to the current realities in the region. Therefore, after much deliberation, I voted Yes on the Massie amendment. My commitment to the U.S.-Israel relationship and to a two-state solution—an independent, viable Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel—remains ironclad.”
• Jacobs (D-CA) 7/15/26: “As Members of Congress, it is our duty to ensure that our constituents’ hard-earned money is used in a way that advances America’s interests and values. For this reason, we do not support providing an additional $3.3 billion of American taxpayer dollars to be used for Israeli military operations in Gaza and Lebanon—operations which have killed tens of thousands of civilians, led to the indiscriminate destruction of civilian infrastructure, and caused severe and ongoing humanitarian catastrophes. These are just the latest in a long string of human rights violations inflicted on Palestinian civilians. For nearly six decades, Israeli security forces and military authorities have enforced the occupation of the Palestinian territories, including through restrictions on freedom of movement, arbitrary detention, torture, and extrajudicial killings. It is clear that existing human rights conditions on the use of American security assistance have not been meaningfully enforced. Enough is enough. Palestinians and Israelis alike deserve peace, freedom, security, stability, and self-determination. Those aims will only be achieved when their inherent dignity and inalienable rights are at the center of U.S. policy in the region. Diplomacy is the answer, and as long as America provides constant funding for more war, peace will always remain out of reach. Our vote should not be interpreted as opposition to initiatives such as the Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace Act programs or others that foster people-to-people engagement, strengthen civil society, and advance the long-term prospects for a just and lasting peace. We remain committed to supporting these and similar programs while ensuring that U.S. taxpayer dollars advance peace, security, and American interests and values.”
• Jackson (D-IL) 7/15/26: X-post – “War is a choice. So is peace. Americans work too hard to keep writing checks for endless conflict. I voted “no” instead of sending another $3.3 BILLION in taxpayer dollars for more Israeli military operations while the human cost continues to rise. Palestinians and Israelis alike deserve peace, security, freedom, dignity, and self-determination—not more bombs. The movement for peace is growing. It’s time for Congress to stop funding escalation and start fighting for a just and lasting peace.“
• Jayapal (D-WA) 7/15/26: X-post – “The U.S. has a moral obligation to halt all weapons sales to the Israeli government. We cannot be complicit in genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and the collective punishment of millions of civilians. Enough is enough. I will be a YES on the Massie Amendment today.”
• Johnson (D-TX) 7/15/26: X-post – “The United States has a longstanding relationship with Israel, but supporting an ally does not relieve Congress of its duty to provide oversight, evaluate our defense priorities, and ensure taxpayer dollars are being spent in a way that reflects the interests of the American people. Today I voted in favor of Representative Massie’s amendment because the Netanyahu government has carried out humanitarian abuses that can not be ignored. Let me be clear, I have a consistent record of strongly supporting the people of Israel and Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, but that does not mean Congress can continue to provide unconditional military assistance to the current government, especially given the growing conflict in the Middle East. While it is absolutely critical to call out antisemitism, support Israel’s defense against adversaries in the region, and continue to work towards a two-state solution, my concern is with the decisions made by the Netanyahu government as they continue to violate US and international law. Time and again, they have undermined diplomatic efforts, resisted meaningful accountability, and failed to demonstrate that American military assistance is being used to advance lasting peace or to serve our shared strategic interests.“
• Kamlager-Dove (D-CA) 7/15/26: “When I signed onto the Block the Bombs Act, I committed to opposing offensive military aid to the Netanyahu government while still supporting funding for defensive programs. That’s why, after receiving assurances that funding for the Iron Dome would be unaffected, I voted to block taxpayer funding to Israel in the 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. Key to my vote was the elimination of $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing to Israel. Over the years, Prime Minister Netanyahu has repeatedly used U.S. military assistance to commit gross violations of human rights, prolong conflict, and retain his hold on power. I cannot in good conscience support using U.S. taxpayer dollars to help finance Netanyahu’s war apparatus.”
• Kelly (D-IL) 7/15/26: X-post – “I voted to block $3.3 billion in unconditional military aid to the Netanyahu government to send a clear message: while I firmly support Israel’s right to defend itself, there can be no more blank checks and no return to the status quo. Netanyahu himself has said he doesn’t need our financial support. And I agree. True accountability means ensuring American dollars align with our values, and right now, our primary responsibility must be keeping those resources right here at home, lowering housing costs and grocery bills for working families.“
• Khanna (D-CA) 7/14/26: X-post w/ video clip- “I’m voting yes on @RepThomasMassie’s amendment to zero out all aid to Israel, including aid for offensive and defensive weapons like the Iron Dome. I cannot vote for aid to a country that committed genocide and has used tax dollars to detain Americans like me.”
• Khanna (D-CA) 7/15/26: X-post – “Today over 100 Democrats voted for the Massie Amendment to zero aid to Israel. My brother @RepBowman & @CoriBush lost their seats for this stand 2 years ago. As a colleague told me, Black martyrdom is normalized in America. Today I want to recognize their courage.“
• Lee (D-PA) 7/14/26: X-post – “Congress had another opportunity to block our taxpayer dollars from enabling Israel’s crimes. While our movement grows, we cannot keep funding suffering abroad while telling working families we can’t afford quality healthcare, housing, or education.“
• Lee (D-PA) 7/15/26: X-post – “Thousands and thousands of Palestinians have been killed using our tax dollars. This shift in the party is a testament to the movement but it’s still unconscionable for any member of Congress to justify sending any aid to fuel Israel’s genocide.“
• Leger Fernandez (D-NM) 7/15/26: “Peace cannot be built with more bombs. Congress has a responsibility to make sure American taxpayer dollars reflect American laws, American values, and our commitment to human rights. When they do not, we have a duty to change course. I voted for the amendment because the United States cannot continue writing blank checks for offensive military assistance to Netanyahu’s government as he causes such death and destruction for innocent Palestinian civilians, villagers in the West Bank, and disrupts a world order that values peace and respect. The Israeli and Palestinian people both deserve to raise their children free from terror, violence, and fear. Israel has the right to exist and to live in security. Both sides deserve to practice their religion and faith. That’s why I continue to support defensive systems that protect civilian lives, which are not affected by this amendment…“
• Lynch (D-MA) 7/16/26: X-post – “Today, I voted YES on @RepThomasMassie’s amendment to halt an additional $3.3 billion in taxpayer funding for Israeli military operations in Gaza and Lebanon.“
• Mannion (D-NY) 7/15/26: “Israel is a vital American ally and the only democracy in the Middle East. The best way to support the Israeli people and protect Israel’s long-term security is to reject an indefensible status quo and fundamentally reset our relationship with the far-right Netanyahu government. I voted yes on the Massie Amendment because the United States cannot continue providing military assistance without stronger oversight, meaningful accountability, and clear conditions governing how American weapons are used. I have and will continue to support Israel’s right to defend itself. But while this Amendment is flawed, the status quo is untenable. The Netanyahu government must change course. Its conduct has caused intolerable suffering in Gaza, undermined the prospects for peace, and done tremendous damage to Israel’s standing around the world. This Administration has failed to use its influence to end the humanitarian crisis, ensure aid reaches innocent civilians, and bring this devastating conflict to an end. We can both support our ally and ensure that it complies with U.S law and American values. American policy toward Israel and the Palestinian people must be firmly focused on achieving an enduring two-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in peace, dignity, safety, and security. That is the only viable path toward lasting peace and stability in the region, and I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues on a funding bill that gets us closer to that reality.”  
• Massie (R-KY) 7/14/26: X-post – “Minority Leader Jeffries opposes the Massie-Khanna amendment to cut $3 billion of aid to Israel, but leaves members of his party to vote their conscience. My conscience is clear. I will vote against using American tax dollars to fund genocide.”
• Massie (R-KY): Floor statement — “Madam Chair, my amendment is simple. It strikes $3.3 billion of foreign aid to the country of Israel from the State Department funding bill. We have $39.4 trillion of debt. We have needs at home, which include our infrastructure, our roads and bridges. We have a shortfall in this fund. We have our locks and dams, and we are perpetually trying to figure out new funding mechanisms to come up with. We have homeless veterans. We are sending more money to Israel in this bill than we spend on homeless veterans in this country. Just to put it in perspective, there are 3,000 counties in this country, and if we divide that into $3 billion, that is $1 million from every county. This is not an insignificant amount of money that is going overseas. I think we should stop it. We should put them on a diet. They are the biggest welfare recipient of the United States and have been for many years. Madam Chair, $310 billion has been received by Israel from the taxpayers of the United States. That is in inflation-adjusted dollars since we have been giving them money. That is why I think this amendment is important. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.“
• Matsui (D-CA) 7/15/26: “The United States and Israel have a long and important relationship, and I will always support the safety and security of the Israeli people. But the status quo is untenable. I cannot support funding for military aid to any country that fails to comply with U.S. law, U.S. interests, and U.S. values. The Netanyahu government has failed to meet its commitments to peace, humanitarian access, and international law. In Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and now in its efforts to draw the United States further into conflict with Iran, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has shown that it cannot be trusted to use these funds responsibly. That is why I voted yes today. This vote is about the conduct of a government—not Israel’s right to exist, and never the Israeli people. I will continue to support funding for critical defensive programs. Criticism of a government is never license for antisemitism or Islamophobia, and I will keep fighting both wherever they appear. This amendment is not perfect. It is drafted broadly enough that it could affect more than Foreign Military Financing. True security requires a sustainable path: surging humanitarian aid to Gaza, halting settlement construction and settler violence in the West Bank, upholding Palestinian self-determination, and securing permanent peace. Republican leadership brought this amendment up in bad faith to divide a growing pro-peace coalition. I will not let that bad faith obscure the truth: continuing to send military assistance to the Netanyahu government without accountability is not a path to peace.“
• Min (D-CA) 7/15/26: “I voted yes on the Massie Amendment because I cannot in good conscience vote to continue the status quo where American taxpayers are subsidizing the wars being waged by Israel under the direction of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It appears clear that Netanyahu’s government is seeking to expand and prolong war in the Middle East, with no interest in abiding by the terms of a two state solution, which has long been the guiding principle for U.S. military and diplomatic efforts in the region. American tax dollars should not be used to bankroll military action by other countries that do not align with the United States’ interests and values. I will always stand for the right of Israel to exist and to defend itself, and I will be a staunch vote for the provision of defensive armaments, including components for the Iron Dome, to Israel – which are not affected by this amendment. This amendment would stop Israel from using the Foreign Military Financing program, which provides certain countries with grants or loans to purchase American offensive weapons and equipment. I remain committed to building lasting peace in the Middle East, and fostering security and freedom for Palestinians and Israelis alike.” 
• Moore (D-WI) 7/15/26: “Today, I voted in favor of the Massie Amendment to the FY 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, which would impose a one-year moratorium on funding to Israel. This vote represents a continuation of my commitment to the pursuit of peace between the Israeli and Palestinian people. It is my belief that a shift in tactics is now necessary because of my growing frustration with the right-wing government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and its conduct throughout the region. Successive U.S. Administrations have tried to rein in the Netanyahu government only to find those interventions obstructed, including negotiating and implementing critically needed ceasefires that would stop the bloodshed. I remain singularly committed to peace, and it is my belief that the only way peace can be achieved is with a two-state solution where a sovereign Palestinian state exists alongside Israel. I wish the amendment had been more narrowly drafted so that it did not result in cuts to aid that has nothing to do with military actions or territorial expansions. I am especially pained that it would indiscriminately harm funding that fosters cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians. I hope that my vote for the Massie Amendment sends a clear signal that, while Israel, like all states, has a right to defend its borders and people, their actions must remain within the bounds enshrined in international law. U.S. aid should help create the conditions for a secure, prosperous, and peaceful future for Israelis, Palestinians, and the broader Middle East. My vote is especially well-timed to send this message, as it coincides with the looming expiration of the 2016 Memorandum of Understanding outlining U.S. aid to Israel. I continue to see Israel as a vital American ally in the Middle East and the Israeli people as deserving of support to meet the security challenges they face from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and other malignant actors in the region. In order to secure a lasting peace, the government of Israel must first reassess their current military posture; fully engage as a good-faith partner for peace, including in Lebanon and Gaza; address the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the region; take immediate steps to end illegal settlements in the West Bank and combat rising settler violence against Palestinian civilians.”
• Moulton (D-MA) 7/15/26: “Today I will vote in favor of an amendment to remove $3.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer-funded Foreign Military Financing for Israel from this year’s State Department appropriations bill. We simply cannot continue to condone Netanyahu’s actions that are against our moral conscience and our own national security interests by perpetuating the status quo…”
• Moulton (D-MA) 7/15/26: X-post w/ video clip – “I’m voting yes for the Massie Amendment to prevent $3.3 billion in foreign military aid for Israel. We cannot continue to condone Netanyahu’s actions that are against our moral conscience and our own national security interests by perpetuating the status quo.“
• Mullin (D-CA) 7/15/26: “Today I voted NO on the House Republicans’ foreign aid funding bill because it threatens American diplomacy, slashes vital humanitarian aid, undermines our national security, and tries to strip away voting rights from Americans.  While I voted no on the bill, I voted YES on an amendment to cut military and other funding to Israel. I did this to send a clear message to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu: stop the wars and seek peace in the region. I strongly support Israel’s right to exist and protect its citizens, but I cannot agree to continued American support of Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank that I believe stray from American values and law. This was a deeply imperfect and overly broad amendment, and it was a difficult decision as I firmly believe we need more diplomatic, humanitarian, and refugee programs that promote peace. However, I oppose the Trump-Netanyahu war in Iran and believe Netanyahu’s war in Gaza has been a horrific and disproportionate response to the brutal attacks by Hamas on October 7^th. Innocent Palestinians have suffered and I deeply oppose the settlement expansion and violence in the West Bank that every day further threaten chances of peace. I have long supported Israel’s defense from those who seek its destruction. Iron Dome and other purely defensive funding would not have been affected under this amendment. But I firmly believe that further loss of innocent life will never be the answer to this decades-long conflict.For the sake of Israel’s global standing and for the security of the world, we need a change of course in the Middle East. The valued relationship between the U.S. and Israel will need repair and a full reset in a post-Trump and post-Netanyahu world. And as difficult as it may be, we cannot abandon work toward a future Palestinian state co-existing in peace with a Jewish and democratic Israel.”
• Neal (D-MA) 7/15/26: “The United States remains committed to our strong, strategic alliance with Israel and will continue to defend its sovereignty and right to exist as a secure Jewish state. Providing support for Israel’s defense systems, such as the Iron Dome, remains an important priority to protect both American and Israeli interests against those who seek Israel’s destruction. This amendment does not change that commitment or our resolve to eradicate Hamas’s reign of terror. We also have a responsibility to ensure that governments receiving our aid meet the standard our values and laws require. What we are seeing in the Middle East is not sustainable and demands a new path grounded in peace, security, and the right to self-determination for all. That means delivering urgently needed humanitarian aid to the innocent children and families caught in the violence, pursuing a two-state solution, and confronting both terrorism and the cancer of antisemitism. Only then can we build a safer, more secure, and brighter future for everyone.”
• Omar (D-MN) 7/14/26: X-post – “The House will vote on an amendment to cut off aid to Israel. It is unconscionable we continue to fund this genocidal apartheid regime. Voting YES.”
• Pelosi (D-CA) 7/15/16: “Today, the Massie Amendment presents an unfortunate choice to the House. As one who is committed to a strong U.S.-Israel relationship and supportive of a two-state solution, I respect Leader Jeffries’ decisive proposals to achieve a just and lasting peace in the Middle East. For the good of the Israeli people and the Palestinian people, it clear that U.S. policy must change to attain that goal. The United States must be a force for security and stability. The American people are rightly demanding an end to a perpetual cycle of war, and the Netanyahu government cannot maintain its current course. Therefore, while this amendment is ill-conceived, I vote yes for the message that it sends.“
• Ramirez (D-IL) 7/15/26: X-post – “There is no justification for providing $3.3 billion for more bombs. As the lead sponsor of the Block the Bombs Act, I call on my colleagues to vote HELL YES on the Massie Amendment.”
• Ramirez (D-IL) 7/15/26: X-post w/ video clip – “Today, 104 members of Congress voted against military funding for Israel. That is thanks to the tireless advocates and organizers who are pushing members of Congress to prioritize our communities instead of war. We must continue the fight to pass my Block the Bombs Act and end the genocide of Palestinians. Let’s get it done!”
• Randall (D-WA) 7/15/26: “My neighbors have been clear – they don’t want to see more of their taxpayer dollars go towards subsidizing Netanyahu’s endless violence and destabilization of Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and the region at large – especially not without any accountability or oversight for how American weapons are being used. While I’m concerned about how the broad language in this amendment will affect the flow of humanitarian assistance, the risk of approving more offensive military aid without any guardrails is too great and will continue to put innocent civilians in harm’s way. My vote reflects the need for a fundamental change in our approach to the far-right Netanyahu government – one that is long overdue. That means no more additional funding for offensive weapons. I remain committed to protecting the flow of humanitarian aid while ending unconditional and unchecked military support.”
• Raskin (D-MD) 7/15/26: “The Republican Majority is advancing a foreign assistance budget bill that slashes humanitarian assistance, undercuts American diplomacy and dramatically reduces our soft power. Meantime, the Majority advanced a classic ‘Gotcha’ Amendment to this bill, introduced by Representative Massie, which was designed not to promote peace or save civilian lives in the Middle East but simply to try and split Democrats.All the voting options here were, of course, designedly bad and therefore each one was minimally defensible in its own way. This Amendment, even though it was clearly going to fail, was still a bad way to make complicated foreign policy judgments and to organize a reset of American policy toward the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The problem for me is that a ‘No’ vote will be characterized as a vote for the status quo and for supporting Netanyahu and his war of mass destruction and displacement in Gaza, which has killed more than 70,000 Palestinians and brought mass disease, hunger and suffering to the Palestinian people. This war was brought in response to the appalling terrorist attack in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, which involved the murder of more than 1,200 Israelis and the brutal capture of more than 250 hostages, including family members and loved ones of my constituents. But voting ‘No’ was indigestible for reasons I have been repeatedly spelling out ever since it became clear that Netanyahu’s prosecution of the war in Gaza—which was properly justified at inception as an operation to disarm and disable Hamas—was becoming a cauldron of civilian atrocities and human rights violations, some of them involving the families of my own constituents. A constituent from the Gaithersburg area lost dozens of members of her family to a bombing attack on their family compound in Gaza City, and my constituent Chef José Andrés lost ten of his colleagues with World Central Kitchen to armed attacks. I have done everything in my power to move Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government away from policies that implicate them—and us—in mass human rights violations and shameful actions, but they have not engaged in serious dialogue with me or other Members of Congress.A ‘Present’ Vote would also be justifiable under these circumstances because this whole amendment is plainly a political trick designed to divide the Democrats with full knowledge it will not pass. But voting ‘Present’ in this context could be seen by millions of people as a refusal to take a position on furnishing more weapons for Netanyahu’s war in Gaza and the violent chaos being perpetrated by settlers on the West Bank. It could also be read as indifference to the catastrophic folly of the Iran War that was the joint project of President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman. I am not neutral on the violence engulfing the Middle East. We must advance the cause of peace.So I came to a ‘Yes’ vote to register my profound objection to providing billions of dollars of more weaponry and support to the Netanyahu government which has been shockingly reckless and deliberately indifferent towards human life and international human rights and humanitarian law governing the proper treatment of civilians in a military conflict.This, to be sure, is also not an ideal solution. Although the Massie Amendment does not affect defensive weapons systems like Iron Dome and David’s Sling (which would be disqualifying in my mind), its blunt-instrument language potentially cuts some funding for valuable non-military diplomatic programs. I support these programs and believe we need to dramatically expand them and revitalize them as many of them have, in large part, been defunded by the Trump Administration. I reject Congressman Massie’s nativist, categorical opposition to foreign aid and extremist rhetoric.But our funds and our weapons have been used in shameful violence and human rights violations against Palestinians by the government of Prime Minister Netanyahu, who has brought terrible isolation to Israel in the process. I am a passionate champion of democracy, national security and peace for all the people of Israel, as I am a passionate champion of democracy, security and peace for all the Palestinians. For the sake of everyone involved, I believe that we cannot blithely allow these dynamics of war and violence to continue. We need a reset in this relationship. There is a titanic struggle taking place on earth today between democracy and authoritarianism. As we fight to defend democracy, basic human rights and the rule of law in America, we must work to defend democracy, basic human rights and the rule of law all over the world, including amongst our closest allies.”
• Ryan (D-NY) 7/15/26: X-post – “I just voted to block sending $3.3 billion of our taxpayer dollars to Netanyahu’s government. It’s wrong on every level. I expect groups like AIPAC will not support me in my future elections and frankly, I don’t want their support. Hardline stances that refuse to stand up to a corrupt and increasingly dangerous Netanyahu regime have no place in our politics.” Track AIPAC responded: “Thank you, Rep. Ryan. Now will you dump AIPAC?” Ryan replied: – “Yes, don’t want their endorsement and returning the funds.” responding to Track AIPAC X-post: “Thank you, Rep. Ryan. Now will you dump AIPAC?“
• Salinas (D-OR) 7/15/26: “In accordance with my conscience and that of my constituents, I voted against the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Spending Bill…During consideration of the bill, I also supported Rep. Massie’s amendment that would cut $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing to Israel. This is not a decision I made lightly. I firmly believe that Israel has a right to defend itself and the Jewish people need their own homeland but not at the expense of the lives of Palestinians and a homeland for the Palestinian people. This funding would have been used by Israel to purchase U.S. bombs and military equipment, and Israel has not demonstrated that they would use this military equipment responsibly with the U.S. interest to find a durable peace in the region. I stand ready to support our allies with the resources they need when it’s clear those resources will go toward self-defense and promoting lasting peace.”
• Sanders (I-VT) 7/15/26: X-post – “THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE CLEAR: NO MORE U.S. AID TO ISRAEL Today, the U.S. House of Representatives will vote on an amendment introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie to cut the $3.3 billion in annual U.S. military aid to Israel. I strongly support this amendment. Israel, like any other country, had the right to defend itself against the horrific terrorist attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, which killed 1,200 innocent people. But it did not have the right to go to war against the entire Palestinian population. It did not have the right to kill more than 73,000 Palestinians and wound over 173,000 more — the vast majority of them women, children and the elderly. It did not have the right to destroy virtually the entire infrastructure of Gaza — the schools, the health facilities, the water systems, wastewater plants, the electric grid that a civilian population depends on to survive. It did not have the right to destroy or damage 92% of all housing units in Gaza. In other words, Israel did not have the right to commit genocide. And it did not have the right to escalate its violence and annexation of the West Bank while the world’s attention was focused elsewhere. Tragically, almost five months ago, Israel, with strong support from the Trump administration, launched a reckless and illegal war against Iran — a war that has killed thousands of people and left an already unstable region of the world even more unstable. That war expanded into Lebanon, where Israeli strikes have now killed more than 4,000 people and displaced some 20% of the entire Lebanese population. That is not “defending Israel”. These are regional wars of expansion and terror, waged without a clear strategy, and without an end in sight. The American people are catching on. Polls show that nearly three-quarters of Democratic voters now oppose sending military aid to Israel, as do more than one-third of Republican voters. Just 16% of all Americans support giving Israel unconditional aid. And I am proud that this past April, 40 out of 47 Senate Democrats — a record number — supported my bill to block arms sales to the far-right, extremist Netanyahu government. We have enormous unmet needs in our own country. Today, while 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck, tens of millions of Americans cannot afford housing, healthcare, childcare and other basic needs. Congress must focus on the needs of their constituents, not an Israeli government that is undermining American values. I urge my colleagues in the House to vote yes on the Massie amendment.”
• Simon (D-CA) 7/15/26: “Today I voted against H.R. 8595, the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027. A year after abruptly shuttering USAID and gutting the State Department – Republicans continue to make devastating and deadly cuts to foreign aid and diplomatic programs. This bill includes steep cuts to global health and diplomatic programs, which will undoubtedly lead to even higher rates of poverty, malnutrition, and death. The President says he is interested in making our nation ‘stronger, safer, and more prosperous,’ yet everything he has done in the past year runs counter to this promise. Starting an illegal and unwanted war in Iran does not make us safer. Ceding America’s voice at international institutions like the United Nations and cutting off resources for diplomacy does not make us stronger. Prohibiting funding for worldwide climate initiatives does not make us more prosperous. I also voted for an amendment to block $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing for Israel. We cannot continue to give military and financial assistance to a government that is not following the Leahy Laws and violating international law. I refuse to support a foreign policy that abandons the institutions we helped build, that leads to preventable deaths, and that chooses destruction over diplomacy and peace.”
• Smith (D-WA) 7/15/26: “This was a very close vote for me. I am a supporter of Israel, and I recognize they are under profound existential threat. We should not forget October 7th or the reality that Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran want to eliminate Israel. I also recognize that many of those who want the U.S. to completely abandon Israel do not support Israel’s right to exist and are willfully blind to the dangerous, violent, extremist beliefs of Hamas and others who threaten Israel.  I am deeply concerned about the tactics used by those on the far left to advocate for cutting off aid to Israel. To date, my family and I have had our home vandalized, a fire has been set in my driveway, my neighbors’ lives have been disrupted by demonstrations in the middle of the night, town halls meant to be forums for dialogue have been shut down, and a staff member has been physically assaulted. Those who engage in this type of behavior model a dangerous form of corrosive politics that seeks to intimidate those who disagree with them. We must be able to have civil discourse if we want to solve difficult problems, and I remain committed to open, respectful engagement.  Despite my support for Israel, for over two years I have been incredibly frustrated by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government and its total war approach in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and even at times in Syria. I understand that Israel has to confront threats to their existence and cannot let them go unchecked. Many of the people calling for a ceasefire on October 8th were people who wanted Hamas to succeed in destroying Israel. But Israel does not have to fight the way they have chosen to do so—a way that has caused enormous suffering and led to endless war. I have also been frustrated by Netanyahu’s refusal to find partners for peace amongst the Palestinian people. And I am absolutely appalled by the actions of Ministers Smotrich and Ben Gvir in the Israeli cabinet. Their callous disregard for human suffering is constant and undermines the credibility of Israel. Lastly, Israel’s actions in the West Bank are indefensible. Lawless settlers commit violence against Palestinians and conduct land grabs while the IDF does little or nothing to stop them. But after nearly two years of me raising these concerns with the Israeli government and U.S. supporters of Israel, nothing has changed. Many express sympathy for my views and assure me things will change, but that has not happened. I take this vote to try once more to get the attention of the Israeli government.  I still support Israel. I recognize the threats they face. But I have an obligation to try to get the attention of the Netanyahu government to force them to change their actions. My vote to stop $3.3 billion in military assistance to Israel is my effort to do that.”
• Stansbury (D-NM) 7/15/26: X-post w/ video clip – “Lebanon. Gaza. The West Bank. We cannot allow American taxpayer dollars to continue to fund the killing of children and civilians abroad. The violence must stop.“
• Stanton (D-AZ) 7/15/26: “I will always vote in America’s best interests. That’s why I voted no on the FY 2026 State Department funding bill. I also voted no on Congressman Massie’s amendment to it. As a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, I know how important it is for the United States to play a leading role in the world. It’s why I opposed Donald Trump’s gutting of USAID and his efforts to weaken NATO. I simply cannot support a Republican bill that slashes State Department funding even further, a 20 percent cut from two years ago. This bill weakens our national security, hacks away at humanitarian aid programs, and guts the diplomatic tools we rely on to prevent conflicts before they start. Retreating from the world doesn’t make America safer—in fact, just the opposite. Similarly, the Massie amendment would undermine America’s ability to counter real threats from Iran and diminish our efforts to promote long-term stability across the region. It would not only cut off funding for security assistance, but also for humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, and peace-building programs, which are critical to building people-to-people ties between Israelis and Palestinians. Standing with an ally does not mean staying silent when its government takes actions that make peace harder to achieve. Benjamin Netanyahu and his government are actively working to undermine a two-state solution. The Netanyahu government’s actions—including empowering extremists, expanding settlements, tolerating settler violence, and misusing American weapons—have weakened Israel’s long-term security, severely damaged Americans’ trust in the Israeli government, and emboldened those who argue peace is impossible. My vote against this flawed amendment is not a defense of those choices. Israelis will have a chance this October to elect a new government, and I sincerely hope Netanyahu loses power. I support sanctions against violent settlers, and the government officials that enable them, who are undermining security and stability in the West Bank. And we must work to rebuild Gaza and ensure aid to its residents is unimpeded.  I also believe that the American taxpayer should no longer subsidize Israel’s defense budget. As the current security assistance agreement with Israel nears expiration, it is clear change is necessary. Instead, our defense partnership with Israel should resemble the partnerships we maintain with the majority of our allies. If Israel buys American weapons, it must be held accountable for how those weapons are used, fully consistent with American law and values. Families across the region, Israeli and Palestinian alike, have endured unimaginable pain and loss because of this conflict. Every Israeli and every Palestinian deserves to live with safety and dignity, free from the constant threat of violence. The greatest threat to peace is the fatalistic belief that coexistence is impossible. I reject that fatalism, and I’ll keep working toward a secure, Jewish, and democratic Israel living side by side with an independent Palestinian state.”
• Tlaib (D-MI) 7/15/26: X-post – “Proud of my colleagues who voted to stop funding Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people. When folks talk about this vote, remember it’s been over 3 years of this violent ethnic cleansing campaign where over 73,000 Palestinians have been killed, millions made homeless, and thousands of amputee children. The genocide continues. Keep talking about Gaza. Never stop.”
• Tonko (D-NY) 7/15/26: “Today, I will vote YES on the Massie amendment that addresses U.S. military aid to Israel. Existing U.S. law prohibits military aid from being provided to entities found to be implicated in gross human rights violations. I believe the Netanyahu government met this standard with their horrific conduct in Gaza.  Since then, Israel has sought to further entangle the United States in a war of choice against Iran and undermine efforts to secure a ceasefire. These actions have only destabilized the region and are actively harming efforts to achieve lasting peace and security for all sides. This is far from a perfect amendment, and I support steps to allow for the continuation of funding for peacebuilding and humanitarian programs that are captured in this overly broad prohibition. However, I will not support additional military aid that enables Netanyahu to bomb other countries relentlessly with the implicit support of the American taxpayers. While I strongly oppose the actions of Israel’s current government, I continue to stand in strong support of our local Jewish community and stand firmly against hate and antisemitism in any form. All Israelis and Palestinians deserve a future where they can live in peace and security. Unfortunately, the actions of the Netanyahu government, supported by U.S. assistance, take us farther away from that future every day. It’s time to chart a new course.”
• Trahan (D-MA) 7/15/26: X-post – “Today, I voted for an amendment to eliminate $3.3 billion in military assistance funding for Israel in this year’s national security funding bill. I want to be clear about why. The status quo is unsustainable. Prime Minister Netanyahu has used American military assistance funding to carry out atrocities in Gaza, embolden violent settlers in the West Bank, and continue indiscriminate bombing in Lebanon. He has shown us again and again that he does not respond to reason. He responds only to direct pressure. It is not a break from what I believe. I have always affirmed Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and its right to defend itself from attack. This vote doesn’t change that. I also remain convinced that a path toward Palestinian self-determination is the only viable way to achieve a peaceful future in the region, and Netanyahu’s government has spent years working to foreclose that path. Because I know how this vote will be twisted by some, it’s important to be direct about something else. Criticism of Netanyahu’s government is not criticism of the Jewish people. At a moment when antisemitism is rising in our country and around the world, that distinction matters. I have condemned antisemitism and religious hatred at every turn, and I always will. Anyone who uses this debate as cover for hate will find no ally in me. The stakes here are bigger than one vote. Netanyahu is turning one of America’s greatest allies into a pariah, one that has lost support from the international community. Netanyahu needs to change course. Until he does, the American people should not be asked to write a blank check.”
• Tran (D-CA) 7/15/26: “American funding for the Israeli military has moved forward for years without real audit or oversight. I supported Representative Massie’s amendment to end unconditional funding for Israel because it’s time we treat Israel as the strong and wealthy nation it is — capable of standing on its own two feet and deserving of accountability. While imperfect, this amendment is an important signal that the United States will treat Israel as we would any other ally. Further actions, like those laid out in Leader Jeffries’ proposal, are necessary to build sustainable security in the Middle East. I support continued funding to keep the Israeli people safe through tools like the Iron Dome, and I will work to ensure that funding for diplomatic programs is assured to build real, lasting peace in the region. As the leader of the free world, America must not only stand firm against our adversaries, but hold our closest allies to account.”
• Vasquez (D-NM) 7/15/26: “Hardworking New Mexicans’ tax dollars should not be spent on a blank check for Netanyahu’s far-right government to unleash senseless violence in Gaza and Lebanon, deny humanitarian aid, and continue the illegal settlements in the West Bank. Enough is enough. The killing of innocent civilians and reckless destruction of homes and infrastructure must end. The American people should not take part in funding this senseless violence.“
• Velazquez (D-NY) 7/15/26: X-post – “I’m voting YES on the Massie amendment. I won’t support sending another blank check to fund the genocide in Gaza and a military campaign in Lebanon that has killed thousands. Enough is enough.“
• Watson Coleman (D-NJ) 7/15/26: “The ongoing horror in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon has shocked the world. The United States places an expectation on its allies to hold up certain standards of humanity. Israel has not only failed to meet those standards; it has engaged in a genocide against the Palestinian people. U.S. law prohibits assistance to foreign security forces when there is credible information of significant violations of human rights. Therefore, the continued military aid to the Netanyahu government violates both our morals and our laws. Last year I stated that: The United States is not merely an observer in this tragedy – we are an active participant. We have supplied the weapons that have flattened neighborhoods, wiped out entire generations of families, and enabled Netanyahu’s relentless assault. The United States has an obligation to identify a red line and hold our allies accountable when they behave in a way that threatens every person’s right to peace and self-determination. We cannot claim to support a ceasefire while providing Prime Minister Netanyahu with the fire that has engulfed Gaza. There must be an arms embargo. If we truly believe in human rights and the dignity of all people, we must stop arming the very forces that are carrying out these atrocities. The Massie amendment holds Israel to the same standard we should hold all our allies to and so I voted for it.“