Trump’s Controversial Pick For Ambassador To Israel

What We’re Reading

US-Israel Relations

Nominee For US Ambassador to Israel Should Set Off Alarm Bells,

“If Friedman’s nomination is an indication of Trump administration policy on Israel-Palestine, the United States is going to deepen the conflict in which Israelis and Palestinians are embroiled. This risks seriously damaging US interests in the region, further violating Palestinians’ basic human rights, and compromising Israeli security,” writes FMEP Vice President, Mitchell Plitnick

Trump’s Israel ambassador seen as shift from status quo,

“(Friedman’s nomination is) a departure from the US consensus since at least the Bill Clinton administration (1992), and from the overwhelming international consensus favoring a Palestinian state,” FMEP President Matt Duss told Arab News.

A Dangerous Choice For Ambassador To Israel,

“With his choice of Mr. Friedman, he has displayed a dangerous ignorance of or indifference to the land mines across the Middle East. The Senate has the responsibility to protect Mr. Trump and the country from taking this reckless step,” writes the New York Times Editorial Board

Occupation/Human rights

Israel Reaches Agreement to Relocate Amona Settlers,

“The various proposals based on takeover of private Palestinian land and presented as an alleged solution to appease lawbreakers — the residents of Amona — are illegal, immoral and unreasonable,” the Israeli human rights group, Yesh Din said in a statement quoted by the New York Times

Want to fight boycotts of Israel? Boycott West Bank settlements instead,

“By boycotting the settlements, Americans would be sending a message of solidarity to progressive Israeli groups such as B’Tselem, Gush Shalom and Peace Now — as well as to Palestinians who suffer the humiliations of the occupation every day,” writes Nathan Hersh

Israeli Politics

The closing of the Israeli mind,

“(Education Minister Naftali) Bennett’s decision to craft an Academic Code is meant to provide guidelines for what can and cannot be said in the classroom, what ideas can be raised and perhaps, too, what subjects can be discussed,” writes former MK Naomi Chazan