Welcome to FMEP’s Weekly Settlement & Annexation Report. To subscribe to this report, please click here.

July 30, 2021

1. Sheikh Jarrah Updates: Court Issues Delays for Three Cases; Bennett Reportedly Considering Delaying Four Others
2. In First Since Settlement Regulation Law Was Overturned, Israel Announces Intent to Demolish Settlement Buildings on Privately Owned Palestinian Land
3. Elad Settler Group Loses Control Over East Jerusalem Holy Site/Archaeological Park
4. Knesset Votes Down West Bank Annexation Bill, Condemns Ben & Jerry’s
5. State Allows (& Funds) “Farming Outposts” to Graze Huge Tracts of West Bank Land
6. Outpost Activity Continues in the South Hebron Hills
7. Israeli Army Let Settlers Stay at Abandoned Base Despite Knowing Plans for Illegal Outpost
8. Bonus Reads

Comments or questions? Email Kristin McCarthy – kmccarthy@fmep.org.

---

Sheikh Jarrah Updates: Court Issues Delays for Three Cases; Bennett Reportedly Considering Delaying Four Others

On July 29th, the Israeli Supreme Court issued notices delaying the forcible displacement of three families (Dajani, Hammad, and Dahoudi) from their longtime homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem. The eviction orders were set to become enforceable on Sunday August 1st, but the Court has halted the evictions while an appeal filed by the Palestinian families is dealt with.

Also sheduled for August  2nd, the Supreme Court is currently set to hold a final hearing to decide on the fate of four other Palestinian families (Jaouni, Iskafi, al-Kurd, and al-Qadi) facing forcible eviction in Sheikh Jarrah. According to press reports, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett is considering delaying the final hearing (thus stopping the evictions for the time being). Notably, reports suggest Bennett is looking not to cancel the evictions but only to postpone a final decision on them – a postponement that could be reversed at any time at the whim of the Prime Minister (for example, when the world’s attention is elsewhere).

In an op-ed in The Guardian, Mohammad El-Kurd – whose family is facing eviction – powerfully wrote:

“On 2 August, the Israeli supreme court, whose jurisdiction over the eastern part of Jerusalem defies international law, is set to decide whether it will allow the appeal of my family and three others – a last legal obstacle before we can be expelled. There have been postponements before. Palestinians are accustomed to this kind of stalling; it tests our stamina. But we are as stubborn as anyone else faced with the prospect of losing their home – their life, their memories – to those using force, intimidation and biased laws. In the face of this cruelty, and despite teargas and skunk water, we are resisting. We cannot allow them to steal our homes once more, and we refuse to continue living in refugee camps while colonisers live in our houses. We cannot let them throw more of us on to the streets. We are tired of being turned into a refugee population, neighbourhood after neighbourhood, one home at a time. I have no faith in the Israeli judicial system; it is a part of the settler-colonial state, built by settlers for settlers. Nor do I expect any of the international governments who have been deeply complicit in Israel’s colonial enterprise to intervene on our behalf. But I do have faith in those people around the world who protest and pressure their governments to end what is essentially unconditional support for Israeli policies. Impunity and war crimes will not be stopped by statements of condemnation and raised eyebrows. We Palestinians have repeatedly articulated what kind of transformative political measures must be taken – such as civil society boycotts and state-level sanctions. The problem is not ignorance, it is inaction.”

In First Since Settlement Regulation Law Was Overturned, Israel Announces Intent to Demolish Settlement Buildings on Privately Owned Palestinian Land

On July 28th, the Israeli Attorney General’s office informed the High Court of Justice that within three years (!!) it plans to carry out the demolition of two buildings built by settlers on privately owned Palestinian land located inside of the Eli settlement, in the context of a petition filed in 2011 by Palestinian land owners with the assistance of Yesh Din and Bimkom. Notably, the underlying legal petition sought the demolition of a total of 20 buildings constructed illegally on private Palestinian land, 18 of which Israel granted retroactive legalization in February 2020.

According to the Jerusalem Post, this is the first instance of the Court resuming looking at a case of this kind since the Settlement Regulation Law was overturned by the Court in June 2020. Previously, all cases involving illegal construction inside of settlements had been frozen while the Court considered the constitutionality of the law, which sought to create a legal basis by which Israel would be able to grant retroactive legalization to outposts and settlement structures built on land that even Israel acknowledges is privately owned by Palestinians.

In resuming its consideration of the case, the Court first asked to be updated on the State’s reexamination of the status of the land in hopes of finding a means by which to retroactively legalize the illegal construction, despite the fact that a previous government effort confirmed that the two buildings fall outside of the boundaries of state-owned land. With no other avenue available to “legalize” the construction, the State informed the Court this week that it intends to demolish the structures after the three years, which it claimed was the amount of time required to provide new housing for the four affected settler families [demonstrating, as always, that settler law-breakers are never punished and always rewarded]. This long delay also suggests that the State will continue to look for new ways to avoid demolishing the homes.

Leaders of the Land of Israel Lobby in the Knesset, MKs Yoav Kisch and Orit Strock, told Israel Hayom:

 “This week, the government informed the High Court of Justice that it agrees to demolish the homes of four families in Eli. This is a horrifying, shocking announcement. Rather than preventing the destruction of Jewish homes in Judea and Samaria, the government is busy regulating the illegal construction crimes in the Bedouin sector. This is a badge of shame for the government, which is freezing construction, as well as going back on all its promises to regulate [settlements] and also demolishing Jews’ homes.”

Yisrael Gantz – who heads the Benyamim settler regional council –  said:

“We are surprised that the government is falling in line with the Arab petitioners and announcing that it will, heaven forbid, demolish two homes where families have been living for years, which are part of a living, vibrant neighborhood. Razing a home whose status was legal and which a new review by the Civil Administration left outside the settlement’s borders is a new low in crimes against settlement in Judea and Samaria. These two homes are just a preview. We have hundreds of homes with similar status in the Binyamin settlements and thousands throughout the settlements as a whole that suddenly found themselves outside the new ‘blue lines’ drawn in the Civil Administration’s work. No normal country would demolish homes in a situation like this.”

Elad Settler Group Loses Control Over East Jerusalem Holy Site/Archaeological Park

On July 1st, the State of Israel re-asserted control over a significant and highly sensitive archaeological and holy  site – the Davidson Archaeological Park – located just outside of the walls of the Temple Mount/Haram Al-Sharif. The park, which includes most notably tunnels that run directly from the Western Wall plaza to the settler-run Davidson Center in Silawn – had been run by the Elad settler organization since 2018, when the State willingly transferred its authority to Elad to operate the park. 

In 2015 the Israeli NGO Emek Shaveh, which is made up of archeological experts,  filed a petition against Elad’s role at the park, arguing that “it is highly problematic to place the running or management of a holy site that is situated alongside the Western Wall foundations in the hands of a private and politicized organization.”  Emek Shaveh’s argument mirrored an opinion issued by Israel’s Attorney General which held that holy sites should be managed by the State.

Notably, the end of the state’s contract with Elad regarding the Davidson Park reduces but does not eliminate Elad’s role in managing key sites in Jerusalem. Elad continues to operate the nearby City of David archaeological park (just outside the Old City’s walls), where it has been advancing numerous settlement projects meant to strengthen its control over the area and displace Palestinians.

Emek Shaveh said in a statement: 

“We are pleased that the authorities have put an end to a highly problematic arrangement whereby a private right-wing organization is operating an important site situated in perhaps the most sensitive place in the region. We hope that in the future the State will take full responsibility for additional sites which it handed over to the settlers’ foundation. The City of David is, no doubt, the next site that ought to be returned to full management by the State. Emek Shaveh’s case regarding the tunnel linking the Davidson Center to Givati is still ongoing.”

Knesset Votes Down West Bank Annexation Bill, Condemns Ben & Jerry’s

In a July 28th preliminary vote the Knesset rejected, by a relatively slim margin (64 to 50), a bill to annex the entire West Bank. Members of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s ruling party, Yamina, voted against the bill. The bill had been submitted by members of the Likud party, which is now in the opposition after 15 years of being the most powerful party in the country and having had the ability to pass such a bill if desired. One of the bill’s cosponsors, Miki Zohar, said after the vote:

“You promised again and again that you will take action to bring about sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and you once again broke your word,” Zohar said. “You once again proved that you have no ideology and that no values are holy for you except for keeping your cabinet seats.”

Justice Minister Gideon Sa’ar (New Hope) responded, saying:

“I heard MK Mikki Zohar relating to the fact that in the last administration, Netanyahu wanted to apply sovereignty but Blue and White prevented him from doing so. And I was just thinking to myself, ‘How far from the truth can you get?’…So you, MK Zohar, party whip for the Likud in the last Knesset, could have brought this bill up in the last Netanyahu government, during the Trump administration, during the amazing window of opportunity – you could have submitted the sovereignty bill and had a majority in the Knesset.”

Around the same time this bill was voted on, 90 members of the Knesset, including Yamina members, signed a letter calling on Ben & Jerry’s to reverse its decision to end sales in the occupied West Bank. The letter refers to settlements as “towns and cities in Israel” – a statement tantamount to a declaration of de facto – if not official – annexation. Notably, 6 MKs – from Labor and Meretz – subsequently removed their names for the letter, claiming that they signed on without seeing the final wording, and that the final wording does not reflect their views.

State Allows (& Funds) “Farming Outposts” to Graze Huge Tracts of West Bank Land

In response to a Peace Now inquiry, the Israeli Agricultural Ministry revealed that it has granted permits to unauthorized (i.e., illegal under even Israel law) agricultural outposts to use over 2,000 acres (8,500 dunams) of land in the West Bank for grazing, in a program which entrenches and expands the outposts’ illegal presence across the West Bank. 

And if that wasn’t enough of a scandal, the Ministry confirmed that it provided sizable grants – totalling over $800,000 (2.6 million NIS) over the past few years – to at least three settlement organizations for the purpose of bringing volunteers to these outposts – which, again, are illegal even under Israeli law – to work the land. Notably, these settler organizations publicly boast about their farming activities with respect to a total of 50 farming outposts, suggesting that settlers are making use of far more than the 2,000 acres permitted by the Ministry (the Ministry clarified that it funds activities only related to the areas where settlers are authorized to work — so apparently they see no problem].

Peace Now said:

“The Ministry of Agriculture takes millions of Shekels of public monies and give them to associations which are intrinsically linked to illegal activity. If the government wants to stop more outposts such as “Evyatar” from existing, and to stop the small group of ideological settlers who allow themselves to set facts on the ground that determines the foreign and security policies for Israel, it must change its ways immediately and stop supporting outposts and illegal activities”.

Two of the outposts to which the Agricultural Ministry awarded grazing permits are located in the south Hebron hills, on land that is privately owned by Palestinians.  One of those outposts, established by a settler named Shavti Kohslaviski, has active demolition orders issued against it. A third outpost that received grazing permits is located near the Elon Moreh settlement, on a site that is partially privately owned Palestinian land that Israel has made inaccessible to its Palestinian owners but on which settlers regularly trespass . 

Israeli Army Let Settlers Stay at Abandoned Base Despite Knowing Plans for Illegal Outpost

Kerem Navot reports that on July 23rd, dozens of settlers were allowed to stay at an abandoned military base in the Jordan Valley with permission of the Israeli army. The Israeli Commander in charge of the area reportedly said that he granted permission for the settlers to hike in the area and spend one night at the army base – – despite the fact that the settlers openly declared their intent to establish a permanent presence there. The settlers left after two nights at the site, though a government source told Haaretz that the problem will continue to linger, saying “the minute the brigade commander allowed this one time, they will go up there regularly, when they feel like it, with or without permission, and the defense establishment will have to start dealing with it.” 

Kerem Navot reports:

“The organization that is behind this current takeover attempt is called “Nahala.” Nahala is the same group behind the takeover of Mount Sbeih south of the village of Beita, upon which the outpost of Eviatar was founded two months ago, and operates behind a fictional NGO (which we wrote about not long ago- https://bit.ly/3763yJW). Yes, you understood that correctly: The same people who broke the law when they established the outpost Eviatar, are advancing a new aggressive takeover of lands that do not belong to them, instead of standing trial. Welcome to the West Bank.”

Outpost Activity Continues in the South Hebron Hills

On July 25th, Palestinian media reported that settlers have begun reestablishing an outpost in the south Herbron hills, near the town of Yatta. Settlers had abandoned the outpost a few months ago under regular protests by Palestinians.

On July 27th, the Israeli government dismantled another outpost – called “Beit Dror” by settlers – in the south Hebron hills. There were seven families of settlers living at the outpost in pre-fabricated homes which were removed from the area by cranes. Following the evacuation, the settlers held a cornerstone-laying ceremony at the site, vowing to return and permanently build on the land. 

Bonus Reads

1. “Over 140 Palestinians hurt after Israeli troops attack anti-settlement protesters” (The New Arab)
2. “A water spring in the occupied Jordan Valley targeted for takeover by Israeli settlers” (WAFA)
3. “Palestinian teenager killed by Israeli troops in West Bank” (The New Arab)
4. “Ben & Jerry’s Is Shunning Israeli Settlements. The U.S. Should Too” (DAWN)

Welcome to FMEP’s Weekly Settlement & Annexation Report. To subscribe to this report, please click here.

July 16, 2021

1. The E-1 Settlement is Back on the Agenda
2. Tender for Israeli Construction on Ruins of Lifta Stirs Controversy as Plan Barrels Forward
3. Likud Submits Annexation Bill for all of West Bank
4. Bonus Reads

Comments or questions? Email Kristin McCarthy – kmccarthy@fmep.org.

---

The E-1 Settlement is Back on the Agenda

The Israeli government has announced that the E-1 settlement plan – long understood to be a “doomsday” settlement by those hoping to achieve a two-state solution – will be discussed by Israel’s West Bank planning authority on August 9th.  Given the highly sensitive nature of the E-1 settlement, the international community has long engaged intensively to dissuade the Israeli government from advancing the plan.

The E-1 settlement is at the planning stage where objections filed by the public against the plan will be heard and discussed by the Israeli High Planning Committee (a body within the Israeli Defense Ministry responsible for regulating construction in the occupied West Bank). Several Israeli NGOs – including Peace Now, Ir Amim, and the Association of Environmental Justice in Israel – jointly filed an objection in August 2020 against the E-1 plan, citing a litany of problems including several dire economic repercussions as well as the inherent inequality and discrimination of planning this community for Israelis. Those objections will be part of what the Planning Committee will discuss if it meets on August 9th. Once all objections have been dealt with (e.g., rejected, or addressed via changes in the plan), the Committee can grant final approval for construction.

In its current form, the E-1 plan provides for the construction of 3,412 new settlement units on an area of land located northeast of Jerusalem. The site is home to several Palestinian bedouin communities, including Khan al-Ahmar, which Israel has already undertaken many attempts to forcibly displace. Long called a “doomsday” settlement by supporters of a two-state solution, construction of the E-1 settlement would sever East Jerusalem from its West Bank hinterland. It would also  cut the West Bank effectively in half,  foreclosing the possibility of drawing a border between Israel and Palestine in a manner which preserves territorial contiguity between the northern and southern parts of the West Bank. Israel’s “answer” to the latter criticism has long been the argument that Palestinians don’t need territorial contiguity, and that new roads can instead provide “transportational continuity.” To this end, Israel has build the “Sovereignty Road” – a sealed road passing through the E-1 area, that is wholly under Israel’s total control (meaning Israel can cut off passage through it at any time). In January 2021, then-PM  Netanyahu promised to increase funding for the Sovereignty Road as part of the drive to get E-1 built. 

As a reminder: there have been attempts to promote the E1 plan since the 1990s, but due to wall-to-wall international opposition, the plan was not advanced until 2012, when Netaynuahu ordered it to be approved for depositing. Following an outcry from the international community, the plan again went into a sort of dormancy…until Netanyahu put it back on the agenda in February 2020 when he was facing his third round of elections in the two years. Also, as a reminder: under the Trump Plan (which the Biden Administration has yet to comment on), the area where E-1 is located is slated to become part of Israel.

Commenting on the imminent advancement on the E-1 plan Peace Now said: 

“This plan poses a real threat for the chance for peace thus has gained sharp opposition in Israel and internationally. The Bennett Lapid government has glorified itself in turning a new page with the world and the citizens of Israel, but promoting the plan in E1 shows the opposite and will bring us back to the dangerous policies furthered by Netanyahu. The Minister of Defense can and must freeze this plan so that the Israeli interest is safeguarded and a wrong prevented.”

Tender for Israeli Construction on Ruins of Lifta Stirs Controversy as Plan Barrels Forward

A disagreement between the Jerusalem Municipality and the Israel Land Authority might help activists in cancelling (or at least delaying) the issuance of a tender for the construction of luxury highrise apartment buildings and a hotel on the ruins of the Palestinian neighborhood of Lifta in West Jerusalem. The tender is scheduled to be issued on July 29th. The Municipality says that the tender is being issued without its support, and that the Mayor of Jerusalem, Moshe Leon (Likud) wants to reexamine the plan. Palestinians have been actively protesting and inhabiting the lands of Lifta – as well as preparing a legal challenge to the plan – in an attempt to stop the construction of a new Israel neighborhood that will no doubt be an inhospitable and economically inaccessible place for Palestinian citizens of Israel and Jerusalem ID holders.

Sami Arshid, a lawyer who represented the families of the refugees previously, said: 

“At this stage, the battle has been renewed through a request to the Israel Land Authority, the Jerusalem Municipality and the regional planning and building committee with a request to cancel the new tender and to carry out new planning based on the findings of the preservation survey of the Antiquities Authority. At the same time, we demand to act to strengthen the existing structures to prevent the continued collapse of cultural assets. If this request is not honored in the next few days, we will once again be forced to turn to the courts.”

Emek Shaveh’s Yonathan Mizrachi told Haaretz: 

“You don’t need to be an archaeologist to enjoy the history that the remnants of the village of Lifta recount. Generations of Israelis who came to the site in their childhood brought the village back to life in their imaginations, understood how the agricultural and architectural culture of the land looked in the last hundreds of years, and no less than that, gained a deep and direct understanding of the story of the land.”

While FMEP’s settlement and annexation report focuses on settlement building in areas located over the 1967 Green Line, the story of Lifta – and of other Palestinian villages forcibly depopulated by Israeli forces in the 1948 – is another facet of the Israeli government’s policy of erasure of Palestinians via the establishment of Jewish Israeli communities. You can read one Palestinian’s account of forced her forced displacement from Lifta, here.

Likud Submits Annexation Bill for all of West Bank

On July 13, the Likud Party presented a bill for the annexation of the West Bank to the Knesset’s committee on Legislative Affairs, which is slated to hold a first vote on a bill on July 18th. The bill was authored by Likud MK Miki Zohar, who has previously submitted other – more limited – annexation bills, as well as a bill to prevent the government from dismantling any settlements.

Zohar is a fervent supporter of annexation and settlement growth. Zohar has participated in events hosted by the Sovereignty Movement – an offshoot of the pro-settlement Women in Green organization – which has established and expanded its influence with Israeli politicians and public discourse over the past two years. Zohar has also participated in the movement to reestablish the four settlements in the northern West Bank – Sa Nur, Homesh, Ganim, and Kadim – which were dismantled by the Israeli government as part of the 2005 Gaza Disengagement.

Bonus Reads

1. “Israeli settlements should be classified as war crimes, says UN expert” (United Nations Human Rights Council)
2. “Israeli Soldiers Shoot at Palestinian Shepherd Outside West Bank Settlement” (Haaretz)
3. “JOINT MILITIAS: On a Single Day in May, Israeli Settlers and Soldiers Cooperated in Attacks That Left Four Palestinians Dead” (The Intercept)
4. “‘It will be easier for our government to work with the current US administration’” (Israel Hayom)

Welcome to FMEP’s Weekly Settlement & Annexation Report. To subscribe to this report, please click here.

June 17, 2021

1. The New Israeli Government: Key Figures, Items on the Agenda, & Early Indications Related to Settlements & Annexation
2. Struggle Against New Outpost Sparks  West Bank Protests & Israeli Army Violence
3. 30 Palestinian Families in Hebron Receive Demolition Notices to Make Way for Kiryat Arba Settlement Expansion
4. Settlers Continue Persistent Invasions of Sebastia Archaeological Site Near Nablus
5. Bonus Reads

Comments or questions? Email Kristin McCarthy – kmccarthy@fmep.org.

---

The New Israeli Government: Key Figures, Items on the Agenda, & Early Indications Related to Settlements & Annexation

A new Israeli government was sworn into office on June 13, 2021. For settlement watchers – here are key facts to know.

Key figures involved in settlement and annexation policy:

• Prime Minister: Naftali Bennet (Yamina)
• Alternate Prime Minister & Foreign Affairs Minister, to rotate to Prime Minister in 2023: Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid)
• Defense Minister: Benny Gantz (Blue and White)
  • The Israeli Defense Ministry oversees the Civil Administration, the oddly-named arm of the Defense Ministry responsible for administering the occupation in the West Bank. The Civil Administration has total civilian and security control over Area C including the settlements (60% of the West Bank), and security control over Area B (21% of the West Bank). Press reports suggest that Labor’s Merav Michaeli – who is now serving as the Transportation Minister – attempted to bring West Bank roads under her purview (which would be an act of de facto annexation – West Bank roads are outside of Israel’s sovereignty and not under its domestic control). That was rejected by Gantz, who will retain control of West Bank matters as Defense Minister. One settler recently paraphrased Gantz as saying: “Only I will decide on settlement construction and negotiate with the Americans on issues pertaining to Judea and Samaria.”
• Settlement Affairs Minister: Nir Orbach (Yamina)
• Construction and Housing Minister & Minister for Jerusalem Affairs: Ze’ev Elkin (New Hope) 
• Justice Minister: Gideon Sa’ar (New Hope)
• Minister of the Interior: Ayelet Shaked (Yamina)
  • Shaked, who previously served as Justice Minister, hard-bargained her way into a second highly consequential posting as the government representative to the Knesset’s Judicial Selection Committee. Ynet reports that the coalition has agreed to name Shaked to the post only after a representative from the Labor Party (reportedly Merav Michaeli) is seated on the panel.
• The coalition’s Security Cabinet will include: Bennett, Lapid, Gantz, Sa’ar, Shaked, Elkin, in addition to: Avigdor Liberman (Finance Minister – Yisrael Beiteinu) Merav Michaeli (Transportation Minister, Labor), Omer Barlev (Public Security Minister – Labor), Nitzan Horowitz (Health Minister – Meretz), Matan Kahana (Religious Minister – Yamina), and Yifat Shasha-Biton (Education Minister – New Hope).

The new government, headed by Nafatli Bennet, published a list of the agreements made by the new coalition – terms that were agreed by all parties as a condition of forming the new government. Those agreements include the following settlement- and annexation-related commitments:

• “Establish a budget for the unfunded students of Ariel University.”

• • • Reminder #1: Ariel University is located in the Ariel settlement in the West Bank. As it is not within Israeli sovereign territory, establishing the university, bringing it under domestic authorities like the Israel High Education Council, and establishing a state budget for it, are all acts of de facto annexation.
    • Reminder #2: While serving previously as Minister of Education, Naftali Bennett was intimately – and inappropriately – involved in bringing Ariel University under the domestic jurisdiction of the Israeli Higher Education Council.
    • Reminder #3: During the Trump Administration, the U.S. signed agreements with Ariel University, a de facto recognition of Israel’s sovereignty in the West Bank. In addition, Florida Governor Rob DeSantis (a close Trump ally and rising political powerhouse in the Trump-aligned Republican party) also signed several agreements establishing academic partnerships between schools in Florida and Ariel University

• “Overall plan for transportation in Judea and Samaria and the Jordan Valley.”

• • For a deep dive into how Israel uses roads and infrastructure as means of de facto annexation and towards the forced displacement of Paelstinians, read this fantastic piece by Break the Silence: “Highway to Annexation: Israeli Road and Infrastructure Development in the West Bank”
• “Ensuring Israel’s national interests in Area C. Allocation of resources to the Ministry of Defense for enforcement in cases of construction violations and illegal takeover of land in Area C.”
  • In his first speech to the Knesset after being sworn in as Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett paid particular attention to this promise, saying: “We will ensure Israel’s national interests in Area C – and we will increase standards to that end after much neglect in this area.”
  • Reminder #1: This is the continuation of an ongoing campaign – led by settlers and their allies in government, including Bennett and Shaked – to entrench and expand Israel’s control over (and de facto annexation of) the entirety of Area C, which represents around 60% of the West Bank. While in the Knesset, Bennet and others were highly critical of the Netanyahu government’s alleged failure to robustly “defend” Israel’s rights/interests in Area C (e.g., preventing “illegal” Palestinian construction, preventing foreign projects that support Palestinians’ presence in the area, clearing out Palestinians, expanding settlements, consolidating state-built settlement infrastructure). Knesset has also repeatedly hosted forums to discuss the alleged “Palestinian takeover of Area C.” 
  • Reminder #2: In September 2020 the Netanyahu government allocated 20 million NIS ($6 million USD) for the newly created Settlement Affairs Ministry to survey and map unauthorized (by Israel) Palestinian construction in Area C (construction for which Palestinians can virtually never obtain Israeli approval, and which Israel has been aggressively demolishing). This funding further empowers a domestic Israeli body to exert extraterritorial sovereignty over Area C – in effect, treating the area as land already annexed by Israel. 
  • The Times of Israel reports that the coalition has also agreed to allow the High Planning Council – the body within the Defense Ministry that considers and approves all settlement construction plans – to continue to meet on a quarterly basis, as has been the practice since 2017. The body has not met since January 2021, during the waning hours of the Trump Administration.

Prior to the new government’s swearing-in ceremony, one settler leader – David Elhayani, who heads the Yesha Council (a settler umbrella group) and the Jordan Valley settlement council, and may be the only settler leader who has come out in support of the new coalition –  told the Times of Israel that the new coalition had promised that there would be no freeze on settlement construction. 

Struggle Against New Outpost Sparks  West Bank Protests & Israeli Army Violence

Palestinians have continued their weekly protests against the new illegal outpost – which settlers call “Evyatar,” built on on Mount Sabih, which is land belonging to the village of Beita – located south of Nablus. The Israeli army continues to violently suppress these protests, killing two young Palestinians from Beita over the past two weeks: on June 11th, the IDF shot in the chest (with a live round) and killed 16-year old Palestinian Mohammed Said Mohammad Hamayel; on June 16th, the IDF fatally shot 16-year old Ahmed Bani Shamsa in the head. Seven other protestors have also been shot and a total of five Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces during protests related to Beita and the Evyatar outpost in the past two months. 

A representative from Defense for Children International – Palestine said:

“Israeli forces frequently use live ammunition for crowd control to disperse protesters, ignoring their obligation under international law to only resort to intentional lethal force when a direct, mortal threat to life or of serious injury exists/ Systemic impunity has fostered an environment where Israeli forces know no bounds.”

As a reminder, last week Defense Minister Gantz marked this outpost for evacuation and demolition. But  in the week since the military orders were issued against the outpost (during which a new Israeli government was sworn in) those orders have not been carried out. Instead of evacuating and dismantling the illegal outpost, uniformed IDF soldiers this week were pictured helping the settlers install new construction at the site. 

Explaining the situation, an activist and resident of Beita, Ibrahim Dawoud, told Middle East Eye:

“On every level, the Israeli state is assisting these settlers in the takeover of our land, even though their outpost is illegal under Israel’s own laws. Within 40 days of establishing their outpost, the Israeli government has given these settlers running water, electricity, and have paved a settler-only road for them straight up the mountain…For years the soldiers have prevented [Palstinians from Beita] from accessing their land on the mountain, and it is ours. We have the papers to prove ownership, they do not. They have no right to this land. If someone from Beita even tried to erect a tent on the mountain, just a small tent, the soldiers would be there within seconds, shooting at them and kicking them off their own land. And this is not just in Beita, it’s happening all over Palestine. Israeli settlers are allowed to steal our land freely, but when we try to defend it, we are killed.”

A Facebook page updated by settlers at the outpost states explicitly that the purpose of the outpost is to prevent contiguity between the surrounding Palestinian villages while connecting the Israeli settlement of Tapuah to the Za’atara Junction and Migdalim settlement. [photo]

30 Palestinian Families in Hebron Receive Demolition Notices to Make Way for Kiryat Arba Settlement Expansion

Al-Monitor reports that 30 Palestinian families (approximately 300 people) are under threat of forced displacement from their longtime homes and agricultural land in an area called Khirbet al-Aida, near the Kiryat Arba settlement just outside of Hebron. Israel has asserted the land is “state land,” despite the fact that, according to the nearby Palestinian municipality, all of the families possess Ottoman-era land titles proving their ownership.

Samer Jaber, one of the Palestinians under threat of displacement, recently received an eviction notice after submitting a building permit application to the Israeli authorities. That application was rejected and returned with a notice that Israel has classified Jaber’s land “state land,” and ordered his family’s eviction from the site. Israeli authorities have previously demolished sheds that Jaber built on his land.

Settlers Continue Persistent Invasions of Sebastia Archaeological Site Near Nablus

WAFA reports that on June 16th, hundreds of settlers invaded the Sebastia archaeological site under the protection of the Israeli army. The site is located in the town of Sebastia, near Nablus, a town that is in Area B of the West Bank where Israel – as stipulated in Oslo – should not be operating in. The Mayor of Sebastia, Mohammed Azzem, told WAFA that a large number of Israeli soldiers shut down the town and took up positions in the streets and several rooftops near the site in order to provide security for the settlers.  

Settlers have been openly agitating – with some success – for Israel to assert control over the archaeological site in Sebastia for years. In January 2021, Emek Shaveh (an Israeli NGO expert in – and focused on – archaeology) wrote about what is happening in Sebastia, saying:

“The archaeological site of Sebastia is identified with Samaria, the capital of the Kingdom of ancient Israel in 9-8 BCE. The site also features ruins from the Hellenistic, Roman and later periods. The village of Sebastia is situated within Area B while the site itself is located mainly in area C. Over the past few years, the Samaria Regional Council has been organizing tours to the site, particularly during the school holidays.  Several times this year, the Civil Administration has removed a Palestinian flag from the village and the site. In the most recent incident, a flag was raised following renovation works funded by the Belgian government. In their response the regional council blamed the Palestinians for destroying a site central to Jewish history and UNESCO for supporting the Palestinians. Sebastia is on the tentative list of World Heritage sites in Palestine….the integration of ancient sites into an organized strategy designed to weaken Palestinian hold on Area C is worrying. The formalization of this approach is likely to result in a steep rise in actions over ancient sites and structures, from water cisterns found in many villages, to major sites such as Sebastia. The justification for preserving and developing ancient sites familiar to us from East Jerusalem is now being applied wholesale to hundreds of places in the West Bank to the detriment of the Palestinians living near the sites and to the multilayered heritage inherent in the ruins which will be distorted for political ends.”

As FMEP has chronicled, settlers and their allies are intent upon taking control of archaeological sites and artifacts that are currently under Palestinian control, claiming the sites are neglected and/or damaged. For example, in February 2021 settlers used a construction mishap to raise claims to the Mt. Ebal site. 

In January 2021, the state of Israel committed funding to a new settler initiative to surveil archeological sites under Palestinian control. While the objective of protecting antiquities might appear uncontroversial and apolitical, the true (and transparently self-evident) objective behind this effort is to support yet another pretext to surveil and police Palestinians, and yet another means to dispossess them of their properties. It is the result of a campaign that has taken place over the past year in which settlers have escalated their calls for the Israeli government to seize antiquities located in Palestinian communities across the West Bank, especially in Area C, which Israel today treats as functionally (and legally) indistinguishable from sovereign Israeli territory. The controversy that erupted over the Mt. Ebal archaeological site in February 2021 should be understood in this context.

Previous victories for the settlers include the Israeli Civil Administration’s recent issuance of expropriation orders for two archaeological sites located on privately owned Palestinian property northwest of Ramallah. The expropriations – the first of their kind in 35 years – come amidst a new campaign by settlers lobbying the government to take control of such sites, based on the settlers’ claims that antiquities are being stolen and the sites are being mismanaged by Palestinians. The settlers’ pressure is also credited as the impetus behind the government’s clandestine raid of a Palestinian village in July 2020 to seize an ancient font. The Palestinian envoy to UNESCO, Mounir Anastas, recently called on the United Nations to pressure Israel into returning the font to the Palestinian authorities.

In June 2020, a settler group calling itself “Shomrim Al Hanetzach” (“Guardians of Eternity”) began surveying areas in the West Bank that Israel has designated as archeaological sites in order to call in Israeli authorities to demolish Palestinian construction in these areas. The group communicates its findings to the Archaeology Unit of the Israeli Civil Administration (reminder: the Civil Administration is the arm of the Israeli Defense Ministry which since 1967 has functioned as the de facto sovereign over the West Bank). The Archaeology Unit, playing its part, then delivers eviction and demolition orders against Palestinians, claiming that the structures damage antiquities in the area. 

As a reminder, in 2017, Israel designated 1,000 new archaeological sites in Area C of the West Bank. The “Guardians of Eternity” group, not coincidentally, is an offshoot of the radical Regavim organization, which among other things works to push Israeli authorities to demolish Palestinian construction (on Palestinians’ own land) that lacks Israeli permits (permits that Israel virtually never grants). The group raised public alarm about the Trump Plan, alleging that hundreds of biblical sites in the West Bank are slated to become Palestinian territory. 

Bonus Reads

1. “Former Attorney General Discovers Settler Group Took Over His Family’s Sheikh Jarrah Home” (Haaretz)
2. “Israeli settler assaults Jerusalemite activist Muna al-Kurd” (WAFA)
3. “Karim Khan, new ICC chief prosecutor, to decide Israel’s fate” (Jerusalem Post)
4. “How Israel’s Occupation Came Home” (NewLines // Elizabeth Tsurkov)
5. “Saving Lifta: Palestinians rally against latest threat to depopulated Jerusalem village” (Middle East Eye)
6. “Palestinian mom fights to stave off punitive home demolition” (AP)
7. “Israel to halt nighttime ‘mapping’ of Palestinian homes” (AP)
8. “Family left in shock by shooting of young Palestinian woman” (AP)
9. “Roadblocks upend Palestinian family’s life in East Jerusalem’s Sheikh Jarrah” (Reuters)

Welcome to FMEP’s Weekly Settlement & Annexation Report. To subscribe to this report, please click here.

May 13, 2021

1. Knesset Advances Three Key Annexation Bills
2. Israel’s Official Maps of Jerusalem Land Expropriations — Discrepancies and Room for Interpretation
3. Israel Advances Plan to Build On the Ruins of Lifta, a Historic Palestinian Neighborhood in West Jerusalem
4. In Victory for Settlement Companies, Canadian Appeals Court Reverses Settlement Product Labelling Ruling
5. <New Campaign in Norway Pushes for State Pension Fund to Divest from Occupation
6. Bonus Reads

Comments or questions? Email Kristin McCarthy – kmccarthy@fmep.org.

---

Knesset Advances Three Key Annexation Bills

Notwithstanding surging protests and violence across Israel and the territories it belligerently occupies, the Israeli Knesset voted on May 10th to give preliminary approval to three incendiary bills: one would grant retroactive legalization to 70 unauthorized outposts; a second would rescind the 2005 Disengagement Law, thereby allowing Israel and its settlers to re-establish four settlements in the northern West Bank which were dismantled under that law; and a third bill would empower the Knesset to override decisions by the Israeli Supreme Court and reinstate laws the Court ruled to be unconstitutional (like the Settlement Regulation Law, which is the key target of this legislative effort). FMEP has previously explained these bills here. Ahead of the vote, Defense Minister Benny Gantz asked Prime Minister Netanyahu to intervene to delay the bills, citing the rising violence and unrest.

With the vote to advance the bills on May 10th, the Knesset will need to pass the bills through three more readings. The three bills have long been high on the wish list of many Israeli politicians who support Israel’s annexation of West Bank land.  

Israel’s Official Maps of Jerusalem Land Expropriations — Discrepancies and Room for Interpretation

Following years of advocacy by the Israeli group Bimkom: Planners for Planning Rights, the official maps drawn by the Israeli government when it annexed (illegally) lands around Jerusalem have been released in their entirety for the first time. Though bits and pieces of the maps had been released in the past by the Israel Lands Authority in response to specific inquiries related to land expropriations, the state had kept the maps hidden from the public until now. 

With the maps in hand, Bimkom has launched a website where the maps can be analysed. On the significance of the maps and the ability of the public to access them, Bimkom writes:

“The original expropriation maps were drawn by hand, as was customary at the time. The manual drawing and the passage of years however, have led to defects and distortions in the original paper documents. In many places there is a discrepancy between the hand-drawn maps and contemporary mappings made with the latest technology, and their reading leaves room for interpretation. Hiding the expropriation maps from the public allowed the state authorities to be the sole interpreters of the maps. But now, with the help of the interactive on-line tools offered on Bimkom’s new site, interpretation of the maps will be in the public domain.”

Israel Advances Plan to Build On the Ruins of Lifta, a Historic Palestinian Neighborhood in West Jerusalem

On May 10th (Jerusalem Day), the Israel Lands Authority announced that on July 4, 2021 it will open bidding on construction plans to build a new neighborhood on the ruins of the Palestinian neighborhood of Lifta, located in West Jerusalem. While FMEP’s settlement and annexation report focuses on settlement building in areas located over the 1967 Green Line, the story of Lifta – and of other Palestinian villages forcibly depopulated by Israeli forces in the 1948 – is another facet of the Israeli government’s policy of erasure of Palestinians via the establishment of Jewish Israeli communities. You can read one Palestinian’s account of forced her forced displacement from Lifta, here.

Lifta is the last Palestinian village in Jerusalem to remain partially intact. Israel has prevented Palestinian refugees and landowners from returning to it, but has not yet demolished all the original structures (55 out of the original 400 structures still remain), or opened up the area for Israeli re-development. In 2017 the ruins of Lifta were named by the World Monuments Fund as one of 25 at-risk sites around the world.

The plans being advanced call for the construction of 259 apartment units, a luxury hotel, and other commercial buildings. Former-Jerusalem Municipality council member Yair Gabbai told the Jerusalem Post that a synagogue will be added to the development plan – leaving no doubt about for whom the housing is intended.

In Victory for Settlement Companies, Canadian Appeals Court Reverses Settlement Product Labelling Ruling

On May 6th, a Canadian federal appeals court reversed a 2019 ruling that had prevented Israeli companies based in settlements from labelling their products as “Made in Israel.” The new ruling by the appeals court found that the 2019 decision had been made “improperly,” and sent the case (which was initiated by the Psagot settlement winery) to Canada’s Food Inspection Agency – which had previously allowed the products (wine) from settlements to be labelled as “Made in Israel.”

Psagot Winery is a willing legal test case, as part of an ongoing international campaign led by Israel and its defenders to erase any/all distinction that foreign countries might want to make between the territory recognized by the world as the sovereign state of Israel, and Israeli settlements built in the occupied territories, which are illegal under international law. By convincing countries to treat settlements products as products of the state of Israel, this campaign seeks to secure de facto recognition of Israeli sovereignty over its settlements.

For a deep dive in the history of the Psagot settlement and the significance of former Sec. of State Mike Pompeo’s visit there in the waning days of the Trump Administration – check out this FMEP podcast with Dror Etkes, Fadi Quran, and Lara Friedman. 

New Campaign in Norway Pushes for State Pension Fund to Divest from Occupation

This week two well-respected organizing groups in Norway –  the Norwegian Union of Municipal and General Employees and Norwegian People’s Aid – have launched a campaign calling on the Government Pension Fund (the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world) to exclude from its investment portfolio 64 companies that are “involved in activities that support and profit from illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as well as the occupation economy, in general.”

The campaign website explains:

“The campaign aims to shed light on how investments made by the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), popularly known as the Norwegian oil fund, can contribute to the occupation…Businesses play a key role in supporting the construction, maintenance and expansion of the illegal settlements. International and Israeli companies are found in many business sectors, including banking, tourism, security, technology, construction, real estate, extractive industries, telecommunications, agriculture, transport and industry. Various UN bodies have stated that the close link between settlements and violations of human rights and international law make it practically impossible for a company to do business with the settlements and be compliant with international law and international standards for business and human rights. For this reason, some of these companies have already been excluded by other Norwegian and international financial institutions. We believe that the oil fund should do the same. The oil fund has recently taken steps to look more closely into portfolio companies that operate in high-risk conflict areas. Despite this, investments in companies with activities in occupied Palestinian territory have increased.”

Bonus Reads

1. “EU Court Backs Group Opposed to Imports From Israeli Settlements” (Reuters)
2. “Co-existence in Jaffa Could Cost Arab Residents Their Homes” (Haaretz)